In this thread: Lying Liars and the Leftist Insane Liars who Love and Defend Them
- Thread starter FAUlty Gator
- Start date
This has been covered. You're just being intentionally obtuse now.
FFS, the comma in his statement is important.
Oh, the outrage is definitely coming from one direction all right.
He didn't say that. Stop posting misleading information.
OK. John Lewis is a Democrat. You get that right?
How goddamned delusional do you have to be to expect him to mean that NOT EVERY DEMOCRAT TOOK THE EXACT SAME STANCE. Goddamned the lengths you guys will go to defend this shit. You are by definition a MAGA with this behavior. Congrats.
Not all but polls have shown that most Rs believe that Biden wasn't legitimately elected. One said as high as 70%. That's a pretty phucked up view point.
How about this? Tell me this statement (the first part of the quote is true). Go ahead and prove how full of shit you are.
"[He’ll] be the first modern U.S. president trying to govern in the face of an opposition that refuses to accept his legitimacy,"
Hell...it’s not true because Obama faced that shit.
Thank you for admitting you and Riley and Krugman are all wrong. Apparently “Democrats” means ALL DEMOCRATS. Not 70%. Sorry.
See my above post. Rs don't even believe he was elected. Legitimacy means two totally different things here.
And had a third stolen.
How you got this from my post is a wonder of nature. So. Congrats?
Simple context. He did not say "no Democrats..." referring to individual Democrats he said "no, Democrats..." which references the macro Democrats. This is middle school English stuff that you're getting wrong.
He’s applying the same standard to the GOP. So, you’re saying ALL of them are claiming illegitimacy. Can’t have it both ways. Trying that is part of what makes it a lie. Glad I could help.
And again...you keep ignoring this blatant lie. Trump and Obama BOTH had the same type of opposition. Sorry. He’s a fvcking liar. But a good one. Because he’s lying to people who are ok with his lies.
"[He’ll] be the first modern U.S. president trying to govern in the face of an opposition that refuses to accept his legitimacy,"
Of course, you are wrong again. Obama did not face claims that his election victory was illegitimate.
Again, you are wrong. Far more republicans are claiming illegitimacy, including their leader, which is why that grouping makes sense. Not so for Democrats. And Obama did not face illegitimacy charges for his election wins. That's just made up by you.
Awesome! You must be Krugman!
What Happens When a President Is Declared Illegitimate?
Some Democrats have labeled Donald Trump with the same epithet applied to his two immediate predecessors.
No goalposts moved. You brought it up and I responded to it. FFS you're more desperate than ever.
Did you sleep during the Birther movement? Good grief. Your parsing of the inane bull shit in order to thread the dumbest needle is just gross.
Shoot, even Bill Clinton had his detractors. Well, detractor, singular. Representative Bob Dornan of California made a habit of going after the 42nd president, who he called “a small man in a big office and an illegitimate president” and on another occasion “this illegitimate president ... a serial adulterer ... a triple draft-dodger.”
There's a huge difference between what Obama and Trump went through versus what Biden is going through.
Sure, there was "opposition" and people decrying the legitimacy of the election. But in neither instance did the opposing candidate (in this case the sitting President) refuse to concede an election despite there being several recounts and lawsuits filed that were almost all lost. There is a HUGE difference and I hope you can see that.
Are you saying he lies on the same level as Trump and his administration?
I don't think he does or he wouldn't have made his OP.
No one does that. Just show how Krugman is a liar and how the NYT, who pretends on occasion to be against that type of thing, enables it.
It is a miracle what a plentiful supply of really cheap money dumped into the market can do, ain’t it bill? No one could foresee what was going to happen now, 4 years ago. The apparent “strength” of today’s economy has very little to do with Trump economic policy but a whole to do with Congress and the Feds response to events of the he past couple of years.
You're simply wrong. The birther stuff was before the election. There wasn't a push to overturn Obama's election win nor was there a movement saying the election was illegitimate. You're just making shit up.
And he is not the macro "Republicans". You're flailing and continuing to prove my point. But it's funny so carry on.
Krugman is employed by the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, he writes a column for the NYT.
We are all still waiting to orgasm all over your Evidence Rapture. It will be an incredible orgy.
invite all your friends like Barr and Rudy.
To a point, I agree! But in fairness, BHO ‘s hand was forced ( a tanked economy, sinking fast) whereas Trump made a conscious decision (a tax cut) to heat up the economy. Then for Trump, shit hit the fan and he has no where to go.
I don't know, I assume he gets paid, but I doubt he is an employee. Likely a contractor.
Either way, I'm just clarifying another of your misleading statements by adding pertinent information.
For money. He’s on their payroll.
Why would I FM when you’re giving it away so easily with your uninspired drivel you traipse out here so often?
Filthy Don only wanted to be president for 1/3 of the country, and dems accepted that. Nothing more, nothing less .
Latest posts
-
-
-
Jaxx DeJean Creating His Own Path, Forging Relationships with Iowa
- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
-