1) That five schools in eight years gig as an assistant coach has me a bit baffled. Especially since the last place was working for his brother. What's the reason for moving around so much?
2) This reputation for defense? He had one year in six at Dayton that was really impressive. At least in comparison to McCaffery who I've seen it said a number of times he doesn't coach defense. Now this doesn't mean I'm slamming Miller, but the reach to proclaim his teams as top notch on defense? Look, Kenpom's ADE rating from year one to now for both McCaffery and Miller:
McCaffery, 58. 206, 25, 77, 33, 30, 124. Miller, 158, 145, 72, 31, 15, 41. Are we SURE we're not just seeing a result of personnel on a team?
3) Sorry, but he's 38 and has been a Head Coach at one school for six years. Indiana? They must have lost a lot of appeal.
My thoughts are Iowa probably dodged a bullet. When I said Indiana could do better than Alford I meant a lot of guys other than Archie Miller. I'm not saying he won't end up a good coach for them. I'm saying it took him less time to be hired as a Head Coach at Indiana than it takes some people to become Managers of a Walmart.
At best. Incomplete resume with some questions about getting along with superiors or being able to settle down in one spot. Not enough experience. A high ceiling, high risk, hire.
"At best an incomplete resume"....Hahaha
He's 38; has been a head coach for 6 years and is 140-63 with two A10 championships, 4 straight NCAA appearances including an Elite Eight ... at Dayton...
What is missing from that resume? He's scary qualified and could easily coach for another 25 years. Sans Donovan or Stevens (who were never going to IU) this is absolutely the best hire IU could have made. Slam dunk. They will be tough.