ADVERTISEMENT

Indiana House speaker: Yes, we’re serious about welcoming Illinois counties to Indiana

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,423
62,528
113
When seven counties in Illinois voted in November to explore secession from their state and separate from the influence of Cook County, Indiana House Republicans took notice. When we looked further and found that 33 counties in total had taken a similar vote since 2020, we decided to act. Instead of seceding and forming a 51st state, we think these Illinois counties should join us in Indiana.

There is a constitutional process by which states can redraw their boundaries. Though it would take a concerted, coordinated effort, that doesn’t mean the proposal isn’t serious. It certainly doesn’t mean the residents of those 33 downstate counties aren’t serious in their frustrations. Illinois politicians and thought leaders claiming otherwise do so at their own peril.

Though we welcome this opportunity to highlight what’s great about the Hoosier State, Indiana didn’t dream this scenario up. Illinois residents are voting at the ballot box and quite literally with their feet to leave a state they feel no longer represents or serves them. Since the pandemic, at least 100,000 Illinois residents have chosen to leave their state and come to Indiana, where their taxes and cost of living are lower and where they can access greater economic opportunity, freedom and quality of life.

Due to two decades of commonsense, fiscally responsible leadership in Indiana, the contrasts between our state and our neighbor to the west are stark. In Indiana, we have low debt, balanced budgets and a AAA credit rating, and we’ve cut taxes for our residents every year over the last 10 years, including cutting the income tax again each of the next two years.

Indiana is repeatedly ranked as a top state in the Midwest and country for tax, regulatory and business environment. Chief Executive magazine ranks Indiana first in the Midwest and sixth in the nation for best states for business. The Tax Foundation ranks Indiana top in the Midwest and top 10 overall for tax climate. In 2024 alone, we attracted nearly $40 billion in new private capital investment to our state. We also measure high for affordability, infrastructure, government transparency and accountability, and the list goes on.

Chicago Tribune Opinion: Read the latest editorials and commentary curated by the Tribune Opinion team.



By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and to receive emails from Chicago Tribune.
We’re proud of the results we’re seeing in Indiana and imagine these are the types of results those 33 counties in Illinois are eager to experience. In addition to shared values and economic ideals, Indiana and these areas of Illinois have similar economies, rooted in agriculture and manufacturing. Alignment makes sense.

I’ve authored legislation creating the Indiana-Illinois Boundary Adjustment Commission to evaluate mutual advantages of redrawing state lines, focusing on regions where population dynamics, economic potential and administrative efficiencies could create a win-win scenario for both states. A companion bill has now been filed in the Illinois General Assembly.

We’re ready to work with our colleagues in Illinois who represent these communities and want to be responsive to their residents. To those in Illinois who feel unheard by their state leaders, Indiana is listening, and as you look for a path forward, we’re simply raising our hand with a potential solution. And if Illinois political leaders aren’t willing to act, you can join the former Illinois residents who have already chosen Indiana by moving here. You will be welcomed.
 
How American:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
 
How American:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

It's not like they don't get a vote in Illinois, they just get outvoted.

If you hold to that standard and say any group that gets outvoted regularly can try to join with a different group than we'll pretty much be in total chaos. Because it's not like you can just apply this to conservatives who get outvoted in blue states. Austin would probably like to leave Texas.
 
I think California should dissolve into 52 individual states, each the size of a current congressional district. Since there are currently 43 Dems in the California delegation and 9 Republicans, that would mean a net gain of 66 Democratic Senators as compared to now.

See we can do this all day.
 
It's not like they don't get a vote in Illinois, they just get outvoted.

If you hold to that standard and say any group that gets outvoted regularly can try to join with a different group than we'll pretty much be in total chaos. Because it's not like you can just apply this to conservatives who get outvoted in blue states. Austin would probably like to leave Texas.
Why not seek an arrangement that best effects their safety and happiness with consent of the governed?

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.


People should not be looked upon as captives to a system they're not allowed to improve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Titus Andronicus
I think California should dissolve into 52 individual states, each the size of a current congressional district. Since there are currently 43 Dems in the California delegation and 9 Republicans, that would mean a net gain of 66 Democratic Senators as compared to now.

See we can do this all day.
For clarity, that's not quite the same thing, given that each of those 'Calistates' (homophonic pun intended) would need to petition to be accepted into the union. So proceed at your peril. Because all might not make it, because upon dissolution, the R majority in the HOR would suddenly increase by as much as 34, and in the senate by 2, through subtraction.

(With that said, as to IL/IN redrawing borders but retaining their respective state status, I assume that for at least some period of time until the next census and reapportionment, IL would be like the Oregon State and Wazzou running the imaginary pac10.)
 
Last edited:
When seven counties in Illinois voted in November to explore secession from their state and separate from the influence of Cook County, Indiana House Republicans took notice. When we looked further and found that 33 counties in total had taken a similar vote since 2020, we decided to act. Instead of seceding and forming a 51st state, we think these Illinois counties should join us in Indiana.

There is a constitutional process by which states can redraw their boundaries. Though it would take a concerted, coordinated effort, that doesn’t mean the proposal isn’t serious. It certainly doesn’t mean the residents of those 33 downstate counties aren’t serious in their frustrations. Illinois politicians and thought leaders claiming otherwise do so at their own peril.

Though we welcome this opportunity to highlight what’s great about the Hoosier State, Indiana didn’t dream this scenario up. Illinois residents are voting at the ballot box and quite literally with their feet to leave a state they feel no longer represents or serves them. Since the pandemic, at least 100,000 Illinois residents have chosen to leave their state and come to Indiana, where their taxes and cost of living are lower and where they can access greater economic opportunity, freedom and quality of life.

Due to two decades of commonsense, fiscally responsible leadership in Indiana, the contrasts between our state and our neighbor to the west are stark. In Indiana, we have low debt, balanced budgets and a AAA credit rating, and we’ve cut taxes for our residents every year over the last 10 years, including cutting the income tax again each of the next two years.

Indiana is repeatedly ranked as a top state in the Midwest and country for tax, regulatory and business environment. Chief Executive magazine ranks Indiana first in the Midwest and sixth in the nation for best states for business. The Tax Foundation ranks Indiana top in the Midwest and top 10 overall for tax climate. In 2024 alone, we attracted nearly $40 billion in new private capital investment to our state. We also measure high for affordability, infrastructure, government transparency and accountability, and the list goes on.

Chicago Tribune Opinion: Read the latest editorials and commentary curated by the Tribune Opinion team.



By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and to receive emails from Chicago Tribune.
We’re proud of the results we’re seeing in Indiana and imagine these are the types of results those 33 counties in Illinois are eager to experience. In addition to shared values and economic ideals, Indiana and these areas of Illinois have similar economies, rooted in agriculture and manufacturing. Alignment makes sense.

I’ve authored legislation creating the Indiana-Illinois Boundary Adjustment Commission to evaluate mutual advantages of redrawing state lines, focusing on regions where population dynamics, economic potential and administrative efficiencies could create a win-win scenario for both states. A companion bill has now been filed in the Illinois General Assembly.

We’re ready to work with our colleagues in Illinois who represent these communities and want to be responsive to their residents. To those in Illinois who feel unheard by their state leaders, Indiana is listening, and as you look for a path forward, we’re simply raising our hand with a potential solution. And if Illinois political leaders aren’t willing to act, you can join the former Illinois residents who have already chosen Indiana by moving here. You will be welcomed.
I will give him this. That was definitely one of the more polite political trolling jobs I've seen in quite some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seminole97
At this point, it's a political contest between State's Republican Parties to say and do the most ridiculous shit.

Crap flows downhill as we're experiencing right now.

Gonna be a very long four years.
 
Why not seek an arrangement that best effects their safety and happiness with consent of the governed?

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

People should not be looked upon as captives to a system they're not allowed to improve.

Again where do you draw the line? Does Austin get to leave Texas because they don't like the system there?

Can the counties in Northern Indiana leave and join Michigan?

Why is it conservatives in Eastern Oregon or Southern Illinois get to do this but liberals who want out of their state don't?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
The problem is that it would lead to chaos.

Liberty is by definition more chaotic than authoritarianism and central planning, but that doesn’t mean it’s bad, or even necessarily worse.

It seems you perceive a greater desire for these kinds of changes existing, and that even if they were larger than I think, it should be thwarted, but to what gain? If we compel people to live under governments they don’t consent, we’re not maximizing happiness, so what is the actual goal you seek?
 
It's not like they don't get a vote in Illinois, they just get outvoted.

If you hold to that standard and say any group that gets outvoted regularly can try to join with a different group than we'll pretty much be in total chaos. Because it's not like you can just apply this to conservatives who get outvoted in blue states. Austin would probably like to leave Texas.
In all heartbeat. St. Joe, Elkhart, Lagrange, and Steuben to Michigan. LaPorte, Porter, and Lake to Illinois. 3 team swap. I'd love it.
 
Liberty is by definition more chaotic than authoritarianism and central planning, but that doesn’t mean it’s bad, or even necessarily worse.

It seems you perceive a greater desire for these kinds of changes existing, and that even if they were larger than I think, it should be thwarted, but to what gain? If we compel people to live under governments they don’t consent, we’re not maximizing happiness, so what is the actual goal you seek?

I agree but some amount of order is required. Otherwise you have states that are not geographically continuous or every county or small groups of counties calling themselves states.

I mean how does it work when Austin wants out of Texas? Do we declare them to be an enclave within Texas that is it's own state or do we decide that they are an exclave of New Mexico?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT