ADVERTISEMENT

Interesting read

Your first point. You don't support crypto. I am not just talking about crypto. I am talking about scam coins setup and advertised to Trump loyalists, who then invested into said coin, and then got scammed out of their money. Over 800,000 people were scammed out of money on that scam. I have also seen at least two multi billion dollar pump and dumps after the initial rug pull worth tens of billions of stolen money. These second pump and dumps I believe are purchased access as Trump and Friends own 80% of uncirculated supply. Why I find this interesting is that anyone from any nation that wants access could pump the coin, and Trump could swipe out enough share to be below traditional money laundering losses.

That alone makes your OP aka the interesting read completely irrelevant in my opinion. That's before going down the line on the milquetoast post.
I meant the Trump crypto, I am typing on my iPhone and trying to keep things short
 
I meant the Trump crypto, I am typing on my iPhone and trying to keep things short

I will be interested to see where you stand a few months from now. This stuff is not going to end positively for the worker class. I'll leave it there for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32
You lost badly when you look at the amount of swing states Trump won

I didn't lose anything other than money at the grocery store.

Look at the margin of victory in the swing states. Landslides!

Wisconsin

49.6 - 48.7%

Michigan

49.7 - 48.3%

Pennsylvania

50.4 - 48.6%

Georgia

50.7 - 48.5%

Those margins were swayed by the promise of cheaper groceries and world peace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32 and Moral
I didn't lose anything other than money at the grocery store.

Look at the margin of victory in the swing states. Landslides!

Wisconsin

49.6 - 48.7%

Michigan

49.7 - 48.3%

Pennsylvania

50.4 - 48.6%

Georgia

50.7 - 48.5%

Those margins were swayed by the promise of cheaper groceries and world peace.
And you thought it was going to fixed on day 1?
 
And you thought it was going to fixed on day 1?
Nobody thought this. Have they even discussed a concept of a plan yet for lowering prices? All they've been doing is signing EO's for random shit and firing people.

There's been no mention of grocery prices except Trump saying it's not that easy to do, despite saying the exact opposite during his campaign.
 
And you thought it was going to fixed on day 1?
No intelligent person did.

That's why when the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PROMISED IT we said he was full of shit.

Which, of course, he was.

In August 2024, then-candidate former President Donald Trump delivered a press conference surrounded by packaged foods, meats, produce, condiments, milk and eggs.

“When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One,” he said at the time.

So yes, those of us who aren't idiots don't believe anything he says because he just lies over and over and over.
 
Agree to disagree

It would be considered a narrow win if the results were flipped, why is it a big win just because Republicans have lost most popular votes in recent decades? Obama won in places like Iowa and Indiana, those elections were big wins
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
And you thought it was going to fixed on day 1?
He said grocery prices would come down "very quickly" once he was in office, so what's he waiting for? He repeatedly said he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours, so what's he waiting for? Your OP specifically mentions "Doing exactly what you campaigned on" as one of the reasons for supporting Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: torbee
It's endlessly worse we just pissed off our allies and told Gazans they can't have their land and we are going to occupy it. Are these takes an act?
Maybe it’s time to relocate the Gazans, it’s time to think outside the box
 
It would be considered a narrow win if the results were flipped, why is it a big win just because Republicans have lost most popular votes in recent decades? Obama won in places like Iowa and Indiana, those elections were big wins
Because you were running against Trump and the results should have been a blowout by the Dems, the amount of swing states that Trump won was surprising to everyone, hence the big win
 
Interesting read??

Watching paint dry is more interesting than that read.
Well, at least you can’t say…I don’t know what the millions of Trump voters were thinking when they voted for Trump? Whether you agree or not is certainly your prerogative.
 
Right — because if there's one thing we know about Trump and the MAGA crowd, it's that they want to understand their opponent and make changes for the future.

Also: LOLOLOLOL at you posting something that advocates support for Trump and his cohort that includes the words "Transparency," "Honesty" and "Common sense leadership." GTFO.
If your attitude is pervasive among Democrats, the Dems will keep losing future elections.
 
Last edited:
Make of this what you will. I have been wanting to play with these numbers a bit for fun.

Georgia:
Trump 2,663,117
Harris 2,548,017
Difference 115,100 votes or .02% of total votes in Georgia or 57,551 to flip the state

Michigan:
Trump 2,804,647
Harris 2,724,029
Difference 80,618 votes or .014% of total votes in Michigan or 40,320 to flip the state

Pennsylvania:
Trump 3,542,701
Harris 3,421,247
Difference 121,454 votes or .017% of votes in Pennsylvania or 60,728 to flip the state

Wisconsin:
Trump 1,697,626
Harris 1,668,229
Difference 29,397 or .0086% of total votes in Wisconsin or 14,699 to flip the state

The total difference on those four states is 346,569 or .002% of total nation votes excluding third party for this one, but it would lower that difference. Voter turnout in 2024 was fairly high at 63.9%. So Trump while getting 49.8% of the popular vote (not a majority) only received 37% of the vote of those eligible to vote.

So not really that badly. 173,285 votes in the right places would have swung the election the other way.






Ugh Frustrated GIF by Equipe de France de Football


You do however support fraud as you keep lending Trump support. You have consented his crimes and ignored his felonious behavior.
Those #’s still add up to a Trump win. 😉
 
Your first point. You don't support crypto. I am not just talking about crypto. I am talking about scam coins setup and advertised to Trump loyalists, who then invested into said coin, and then got scammed out of their money. Over 800,000 people were scammed out of money on that scam. I have also seen at least two multi billion dollar pump and dumps after the initial rug pull worth tens of billions of stolen money. These second pump and dumps I believe are purchased access as Trump and Friends own 80% of uncirculated supply. Why I find this interesting is that anyone from any nation that wants access could pump the coin, and Trump could swipe out enough share to be below traditional money laundering losses.

That alone makes your OP aka the interesting read completely irrelevant in my opinion. That's before going down the line on the milquetoast post.
If what you’re saying is true…the 800,000 people who were supposedly “scammed” would be raising hell. I haven’t heard anything in the news about this? 🤔
 
No, it's like going 1-2 with the losses being very close. The reaction to that scenario should not be to fire the GM, fire the entire coaching staff, cut/trade several players, and abandon all morals and values.
So, you’re predicting that Kamala will be the Democrat presidential nominee in 2028?
 
If your attitude is pervasive among Democrats, the Dems will keep losing future elections.
As I've said multiple times — I'm fine with Democrats losing every election if the alternative is turning to someone like Trump and abandoning all morals and values.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
So, you’re predicting that Kamala will be the Democrat presidential nominee in 2028?
No — she's done as the party's nominee, just like HRC. But the two losses to Trump don't mean everyone has to go, everything has to be burned to the ground, every policy position must be abandoned, and all values need to be cast aside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
If what you’re saying is true…the 800,000 people who were supposedly “scammed” would be raising hell. I haven’t heard anything in the news about this? 🤔
Sorry they're not storming the U.S. Capitol, which is your preferred move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
Sorry they're not storming the U.S. Capitol, which is your preferred move.

I like how he thinks his ignorance on the subject is a defense or that it needs to be heavily protested to exist. He does this though. He pops into threads, responses to a bunch of posts in a row with one liners, and then he thinks he just owned everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LunchBox50
I like how he thinks his ignorance on the subject is a defense or that it needs to be heavily protested to exist. He does this though. He pops into threads, responses to a bunch of posts in a row with one liners, and then he thinks he just owned everyone.

You write the right words.

I think the forum where you share them is wrong. Maybe think about posting to Facebook because that’s where the OP and his ilk like to find the real men of genius.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT