ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa agency explores using prison labor to build homes

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,640
63,041
113
Interesting idea:

An Iowa agency wants to use inmates to eventually build at least 100 homes a year for low-income individuals around the state, an unusual idea within the expansive prison labor industry that has so far been stalled by a lack of support from lawmakers.

The Iowa Department of Corrections said the program, which was quietly considered but ultimately rejected during the last legislative session, would give inmates work training that could reduce their likelihood of returning to prison once they're released. The agency believes it could also help alleviate Iowa's shortage of skilled workers and its lack of affordable housing.

"There's a lot of wins to this program," said Cord Overton, a corrections spokesman.

Yet the effort has faced an uphill climb so far. A bill to create the program failed to secure enough support in the Republican-controlled Legislature by missing key deadlines for legislation to advance. It was later added to unrelated budget bills before getting cut. Corrections officials plan to pitch the program again, possibly in the legislative session beginning in January.

Most states use prison labor to produce a range of goods and services, but building affordable housing appears rare. Missouri recently launched a program that will involve some inmates building tiny homes. South Dakota inmates have been building homes for more than 20 years, making it the model.

No other state appears to have replicated South Dakota's effort, said Mike Harsma, a spokesman for the South Dakota Housing Development Authority, which partners with its corrections department to run its program.

Other states occasionally contact Harsma's office about the program, but few appear to have followed up. An Iowa delegation traveled to South Dakota earlier this year.

"To my knowledge there's nobody that's doing it, and it is surprising," he said.

The Southeast Iowa Regional Planning Commission, a voluntary organization of local governments, first pitched the housing program to corrections officials about four years ago, and the idea picked up steam last year.

Mike Norris, the commission's executive director, said the group represents 35 mostly rural communities, many of which struggle with a lack of affordable housing, in part due to inconsistent demand for construction and lower profits.

"We want to look for every opportunity, so we can help our communities be resilient and survive," he said about his push for the program. "They're worth it."

Corrections officials estimate Iowa inmates would get paid about $1 an hour to participate in the housing program. That's the same average they're paid through Iowa Prison Industries, which already oversees inmates who make products and furniture sold to government entities and other approved groups. The division sought up to $2 million to start the program, arguing it would later be self-funded.

Such prison programs trouble Angela Hanks, a former director at the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning national think tank. Despite her support of prison apprenticeship programs, Hanks said paying prison inmates below the federal minimum wage for their work is problematic.

"We should be able to ensure that low-income people have housing and ensure that people who are incarcerated aren't exploited," she said. "I think it presents a little bit of a false choice in terms of what is necessary to ensure that low-income people have access to safe affordable housing."


If revisited next year and approved, 12 acres of land next to the Newton state prison in central Iowa would become a fenced-in construction zone where prisoners could build single-story 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom homes, according to a Feb. 12 memo between corrections officials. If the program is fully up and running, state officials envision more than 80 inmates from the nearby medium security facility helping to build at least 100 homes annually that can be shipped around the state.

"The low cost of offender allowances, together with bulk purchases of materials such as roof shingles, lumber and drywall, will allow a turnkey selling price of about $120,000," according to the document.

Iowa Prison Industries also wants approval to create a private nonprofit corporation to run the program with a new board of stakeholders — a mix of individuals involved in the homebuilding industry. Some of their paper trail of work on the program would not be subject to Iowa's open records laws, though the corporation would be required to submit an annual report on its operations and activities.

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds included $1 million for the housing project in budget recommendations she released in January, and an aide said the governor remains supportive of the program.

Key lobbying organizations like the Iowa Association of Business and Industry registered against the main bill that would have created the program. Nicole Crain, a senior vice president for ABI, said the association wants to help address affordable housing concerns but doesn't believe in government competing with the private sector. She expects ABI to review the subject ahead of the next legislative session, but added: "I don't see our position on this issue changing."

Others like the Home Builders Association of Iowa registered for it. Jay Iverson, an executive officer for the Home Builders, said the program shouldn't be considered competition since it would involve building homes in a price range that's not very profitable for the private sector. That means there should be more focus on the plus of hiring ex-inmates who will have training in specialties like heating and cooling, electrical, plumbing and roofing.

"We need as many people as possible in all those various areas of construction," he said.

https://www.nonpareilonline.com/new...cle_2f4422fb-74e5-5c82-af5e-d9eca780e71b.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkAttackDial911
....Hmmmm....giving inmates access to construction tools, sharp objects, etc.

I can see NO DOWNSIDES here.....:eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MitchL
I’m guessing they aren’t going to let those convicted of violent crimes to participate. Probably just those with mild sentences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
....Hmmmm....giving inmates access to construction tools, sharp objects, etc.

I can see NO DOWNSIDES here.....:eek:
Don't they already have access to that stuff to make furniture? Has there been any issues?
 
Don't they already have access to that stuff to make furniture? Has there been any issues?

Just speculatin', but Imma guess that tracking screwdrivers and how many screws get used in a furniture operation is loads simpler than on a construction site....
 
Corrections officials estimate Iowa inmates would get paid about $1 an hour to participate in the housing program.
This is awesome.

Not even non-union labor can touch that.

And with unions being nearly extinct, there's nobody to put up a fight.

If we run out of offenders, just pass some more laws and arrest more people.

I only skimmed the article so maybe this was answered but what cut do the private prison companies get from these sales?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlickShagwell
This is awesome.

Not even non-union labor can touch that.

And with unions being nearly extinct, there's nobody to put up a fight.

If we run out of offenders, just pass some more laws and arrest more people.

I only skimmed the article so maybe this was answered but what cut do the private prison companies get from these sales?

I could be wrong, but I don't believe there are currently any privately run prisons in Iowa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClarindaA's
I only skimmed the article so maybe this was answered but what cut do the private prison companies get from these sales?

Prisons routinely use prisoners for inexpensive, internal labor.

However, that should only apply to government operated prisons; private prisons which are for-profit should pay minimum wage for labor. Like any other business (OR, they can pay the $1 an hour, but MUST PAY the government the difference in wages, plus benefits and/or pay a hefty tax on the difference). I'd recommend that tax or difference is based on more than minimum wage, but rather an equivalent hiring wage.
 
They already do on a daily basis. Who do you think does the work inside/outside the prison to keep the place going?

Protip: As already stated, they do this in CONTROLLED environments. An outdoor construction site is hardly such an environment.
 
Protip: As already stated, they do this in CONTROLLED environments. An outdoor construction site is hardly such an environment.
The article read that it would be inside the perimeter. Besides, minimum outs workers have access to tools, mowers, and everything a person at home would have access to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
This is awesome.

Not even non-union labor can touch that.

And with unions being nearly extinct, there's nobody to put up a fight.

If we run out of offenders, just pass some more laws and arrest more people.

I only skimmed the article so maybe this was answered but what cut do the private prison companies get from these sales?

Iowa Prison Industries also wants approval to create a private nonprofit corporation to run the program with a new board of stakeholders — a mix of individuals involved in the homebuilding industry. Some of their paper trail of work on the program would not be subject to Iowa's open records laws, though the corporation would be required to submit an annual report on its operations and activities.

Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds included $1 million for the housing project in budget recommendations she released in January, and an aide said the governor remains supportive of the program.
 
I’m guessing they aren’t going to let those convicted of violent crimes to participate. Probably just those with mild sentences.

We need to do something. I don't know if this is the something, but it could be interesting to try. Right now, we're taking a lot of young people mostly minority men from poor backgrounds and sending them to prison for non-violent crimes like drug possession. Once in, they affiliate with the various gangs and groups as a way to get by. They're impressionable and they're away for a couple years and they come out with crime ties, a criminal record and a society that isn't likely to give them much of a shot.

We're creating our own criminal class due to our faux effort to be tough on crime. We've created a whole crime industry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I believe that this program would be EXTREMELY beneficial to offenders and recidivism rates. These guys are begging for things like this in order to improve their lives after their sentences are terminated. I'd be a big advocate of this if it were to happen. Let's hope so.

I agree with this. Former prisoners face extremely difficult odds in finding employment after they've completed their sentences, leaving them little recourse from returning to a life of crime. It would be extremely helpful for them to learn skills, especially in an area in which there is a labor shortage, in order for them to find gainful employment and become a productive member of society upon their release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClarindaA's
I agree with this. Former prisoners face extremely difficult odds in finding employment after they've completed their sentences, leaving them little recourse from returning to a life of crime. It would be extremely helpful for them to learn skills, especially in an area in which there is a labor shortage, in order for them to find gainful employment and become a productive member of society upon their release.
Excellent summary and 100% correct. They do need all the help and skills they can acquire in order to not create more victims once released. Just remember, one of these individuals could be your neighbor someday.
 
I cant imagine any contractors lining up to have a bunch of unskilled criminals working on their crew.
 
Excellent summary and 100% correct. They do need all the help and skills they can acquire in order to not create more victims once released. Just remember, one of these individuals could be your neighbor someday.

Good to see there's some agreement from people that normally don't agree. I would fully support this. I could see where the inmates build the walls which are shipped to the site. At the site are ex-inmates who put the homes together. This would give the inmates a job while in prison and then a job when they're out. I'd even go so far as to allow the inmates to live in a house if they wanted to (as long as they continue to work).
 
I cant imagine any contractors lining up to have a bunch of unskilled criminals working on their crew.

Well I can tell you that I know contractors who would gladly hire people "with a past" if they could be fairly assured that the past was really in the past. That might be the rub, but many contractors these days struggle mightily to staff their operations with "clean" workers.

The other possible blocker that I can think of would be this...often contractors are obligated to submit their workers identities for background checks, etc, and/or bond their employees and I suspect that a criminal record would lead to snags and rejections in these areas, etc. Which if true, would just about sink such a program, as then contractors in most cases would not be able to employ people with criminal pasts.

But assuming that there can be some sort of resolution to those issues, I think many contractors would be very open to the idea of hiring someone that really needs/wants a job AND has had some form of training and preparation. There really could be some potential here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
If these people had any kind of work ethic they wouldn't be in prison to start with...........

I don't know if you are serious or not, but while some inmates probably would never turn things around even if given the chance...I absolutely know that some would.

While not necessarily my first choice of career path...some people just do stupid things, especially when they are young, and then get caught, and have to pay the price(prison)...BUT...from there they grow up, wise up, mature, etc. and then make better choices. If something viable could be done to provide that group of people with path to follow to being a productive citizen, how could you oppose that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I don't know if you are serious or not, but while some inmates probably would never turn things around even if given the chance...I absolutely know that some would.

While not necessarily my first choice of career path...some people just do stupid things, especially when they are young, and then get caught, and have to pay the price(prison)...BUT...from there they grow up, wise up, mature, etc. and then make better choices. If something viable could be done to provide that group of people with path to follow to being a productive citizen, how could you oppose that?

Too add to this, we've become such a punitive society. We need a justice system and we need incarceration. What we don't need is a justice system that seems to base its success or failure on growing the number of people incarcerated. We should absolutely want to minimize crime and maximize productive citizens. If there's no "redemption path" for people who make mistakes, but have a chance to grow and improve from those mistakes, then all we're doing is developing a crime industry. There will always be some who need long-term incarceration (severe/violent criminals) and some will never straighten out....but it's good for all of us if we can take people who made mistakes and give them tools to eventually come back and be productive citizens.
 
Last edited:
My grandfather owned a mid sized construction company in Ft. Madison in the '50s and '60s and he often hired parolees who had nowhere else to go. Few hung around. Some stole tools and took off but he continued to hire them.

At the time Ft. Madison State Pen had a shop that turned out fine woodworking and leather crafts. I believe the altar and pews for our catholic church built in 1902 came from the Fort.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT