You're wrong yet again. And still avoiding questions. Because you're a coward on top of being a dumb ****.Yep, you're definitely angry.
You're wrong yet again. And still avoiding questions. Because you're a coward on top of being a dumb ****.Yep, you're definitely angry.
People like the Dim One live far too long.Iowa would be a far better place to live if Kim Reynolds would just finish what she started and drink herself to death. I’m not sorry for saying so either.
Yeah. I replied to your reply, dumbf.uck. SMH.You didn't reply to that post. You replied to post #110.
It's easy to see why. You're a dumb **** - just like Northern. Coincidence? Doubt it.
Even your step kids friends?🤣There should be NO DEBATE that kids deserve to eat.
My reply to Northern. But, again, I can see why you're confused. You're stupid.Yeah. I replied to your reply, dumbf.uck. SMH.
Nope. I just showed you where you replied to my comment. You are obviously a:My reply to Northern. But, again, I can see why you're confused. You're stupid.
Sigh. You're woefully incorrect yet again. Post 99 was yours and I responded to it with post 108. Northern then made post 109 to which I responded with 110. You replied to post 110 with your post 115. Let's see if you can figure out where the difference is.Nope. I just showed you where you replied to my comment. You are obviously a:
A. liar
B. dumbass
C. both A and B are correct. ✅
Does Iowa not have child protective services? Foster care? Why do EBT cards need to be given to the shitty parents who are already getting EBT cards? It’s a safety net to save people from the safety net.
Why don't you answer the question?
Hint - we know why.
The only reason you and others find yourselves in this untenable position, is your dislike for a R governor.
Wrong again.
Why won't you answer the question?
Again, we know why.
Duly noted, but 108 and 110 were virtually identical posts, so what’s your point? Plus, you lied that you never responded to me, dumbf.uck. Regardless, I did in fact answer the question that you claimed I never answered. 🖕🏻Sigh. You're woefully incorrect yet again. Post 99 was yours and I responded to it with post 108. Northern then made post 109 to which I responded with 110. You replied to post 110 with your post 115. Let's see if you can figure out where the difference is.
I doubt it due to you being a dumb ****.
That you are a dumb ****.Duly noted, but 108 and 110 were virtually identical posts, so what’s your point? Plus, you lied that you never responded to me, dumbf.uck. Regardless, I did in fact answer the question that you claimed I never answered. 🖕🏻
Post #150, dumbfvck:That you are a dumb ****.
I didn't say that I never responded to you - that's you making shit up again. Because you're a lying dumb ****.
You didn't. You responded with several idiotic questions, but no answers. Because you're a dumb ****.
Sigh. You're woefully incorrect yet again. Post 99 was yours and I responded to it with post 108. Northern then made post 109 to which I responded with 110. You replied to post 110 with your post 115. Let's see if you can figure out where the difference is.
I doubt it due to you being a dumb ****.
Where in there did I say I had never responded to you?Post #150, dumbfvck:
“I didn't. I replied to Northern each time and my comments and question was directed to him. “
Six of one, half a dozen…..
🖕🏻
So did I. Finally something in common.Wait, I thought we were the same poster...
When you said you responded to Northern each time. That means NO responses to soonerinlOUsiana, dipshit. Clearly, analytical and deductive reasoning are not part of your skill set. Or maybe you just don’t understand the meanings of the words you use.Where in there did I say I had never responded to you?
You keep proving your dumb f*ckery.
It doesn't. You come to that conclusion because you're a dumb ****.When you said you responded to Northern each time. That means NO responses to soonerinlOUsiana, dipshit. Clearly, analytical and deductive reasoning are not part of your skill set.
So did I.
You don’t know the meaning of the phrase “each time”. If the Hawkeyes play a football game and score on each possession, that means they never fumbled, never threw an interception, never punted, and never turned the ball over on downs. If you responded to a certain poster “each time,” then logically you could not have responded to any other poster during the interval. But logic is clearly not something with which you are familiar.It doesn't. You come to that conclusion because you're a dumb ****.
Now, we all know you will carry on with this nonsense until the bitter end. That's one reason I'm questioning whether you and Northern are the same person - he would have ghosted long ago. It appears you're too stupid to know when to quit.
Have fun continuing to self own.
Lol at you trying to talk sports.You don’t know the meaning of the phrase “each time”. If the Hawkeyes play a football game and score on each possession, that means they never fumbled, never threw an interception, never punted, and never turned the ball over on downs. If you responded to a certain poster “each time,” then logically you could not have responded to any other poster during the interval. But logic is clearly not something with which you are familiar.
LOL, that coming from the dud who knows nothing about sports. So where did I go wrong? Other than perhaps neglecting “never took a knee”.Lol at you trying to talk sports.