ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa releases report card for public schools

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,435
62,542
113
The grades are – mostly – in for area schools.

Officials from the Iowa Department of Education released its new school accountability website, the Iowa School Report Card, on Wednesday morning. The public can view the report card, which includes rankings of individual school buildings, at educateiowa.gov/schoolreportcard

The report card evaluates and rates public schools based on performance on a set of measures, which include reading and math test scores, growth and performance on college and career readiness, how many students are improving academically on time, efforts to close achievement gaps for subgroups, graduation rates, average daily attendance and staff retention.

“The Iowa School Report Card is about helping Iowans find and understand important information about their public schools,” said Ryan Wise, the director of the Iowa Department of Education. “Our objective is to develop a system that is useful and fair.”

Over the past two-and-a-half years, the state has worked on the new website to comply with part of the 2013 educational reform package from the Iowa Legislature. The report card had previously been called the attendance center rankings, but it was renamed to make its function clearer.

The state invested $750,000 over two years to develop the system. Lawmakers charged the state agency with creating an “overall school performance grade and report card” for the state’s public schools.

Across southwest Iowa, ratings in the new system were a little lower than results statewide, although that picture was complicated by how many schools were left unrated in the report card. Across Iowa, there were 212 schools out of 1,343 that received no rating – or about 15.8 percent.

An analysis of The Daily Nonpareil’s coverage area found 19 buildings weren’t rated out of 90 schools in the area, representing 21 percent of the schools served by the newspaper. Those omissions included all the schools in Essex, Riverside and South Page, as well as Crescent Elementary School in the Council Bluffs school district and Kreft Primary School in the Lewis Central school district.

“There are a number of cases of where schools are unable to rate,” said Jay Pennington, chief of the state department's Bureau of Information and Analysis Services.

Pennington said ratings couldn’t be calculated for new schools, which couldn’t be compared to results from the previous year, as well as schools with a small number of students, less than 20 for any given year, which requires the data to be withheld for privacy reasons. Schools with certain grade configurations also weren’t included, such as at least five primary schools in southwest Iowa.

Ratings were assigned using a weighted ranking. Buildings with less than 70 percent of the weighting were not assigned a label, Pennington said. The website lists the areas where school information was not found. So, for example, Treynor Middle School was excluded from the ratings because it lacked data on closing achievement gaps and staff retention, according to the report card.

“We wanted to provide apples-to-apples comparisons so there is enough similar measures across a particular school level for the ratings to be comparable,” Pennington said.

Among those that were grouped into categories, school districts in The Nonpareil coverage area had 31 buildings called “acceptable” and 23 that were “commendable” in the ratings. Those classifications are the most prevalent in the state, too.

Pennington said a bell curve was used to group school buildings, with 70 percent of elementary schools, 73 percent of middle schools and 76 percent of high schools falling into those two groups. In the area, 76.1 percent of all ranked schools fell under one of the two categories.

“We want to lock the distribution in so that schools can begin to improve based on a set of anchor points and not a moving target,” he said.

The area had nine high-performing schools, including all of the Griswold Community School District, which serves Griswold and Lewis in Cass County, Elliott in Montgomery County and portions of extreme eastern Pottawattamie County. Glenwood’s West Elementary and Atlantic Middle School were also high-performing, along with the high schools in Sidney, Treynor, Tri-Center (serving the Neola area) and Underwood.

No area school was deemed “exceptional,” although two Sioux City elementary schools were among those receiving the designation. Statewide, only eight high schools, nine middle schools and 18 elementary schools reached that elite status in the first year of the rankings.

Carter Lake Elementary School, part of the Council Bluffs district, was the only area school deemed a “priority” for improvement by the department. Diane Ostrowski, the chief communications officer for the district, said that label does not carry any sanctions or additional support from the state.

Under previous federal law, districts and schools in Iowa have been identified as in need of assistance based on a different set of benchmarks. Sanctions are attached to those classifications, and it’s unclear how the new Every Student Succeeds Act will change school accountability in Iowa.

Wise said the new Iowa School Report Card fits in with the Every Student Succeeds Act, which shifts the responsibility for accountability toward the states but maintains a federal role. Nebraska recently moved to a similar model to assign ratings to schools, which neither state had previously done.

Data – which for the report card released today come from the 2013-14 and 2014-15 school years – is made available in the spirit of accountability and transparency, Wise said. The ratings were developed with input from teachers, school administrators and others involved in education.

“Each school has an individual story that cannot be told through numbers and ratings,” Wise said. “I’d really encourage all of us to connect with our local public schools to get the full story.”


http://www.nonpareilonline.com/news...cle_93fec1c6-a409-11e5-8ddf-9bf74908b742.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
Well, its nice that the school we open enroll into is higher than the one we open enroll out of. Of course we already knew that when we did it.
 
My alma mater needs improvement, but my kids' school is high-performing, looking like I'm doing something right.
 
I am glad a couple of you recognize that this methodology is BS. Hint: if I can accurately predict 9/10 of the rankings purely based on the make-up of race and socio-economics in the school, it's a gigantic turd of a report.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SchmittyHawks32
Yeah...these ratings are bunk. There are schools that are top 10 in Iowa according to US News and World report that are only "acceptable" or "commendable".
 
Yeah...these ratings are bunk. There are schools that are top 10 in Iowa according to US News and World report that are only "acceptable" or "commendable".

Hell, there's one US News & World Report Silver Medal winner (90-95th percentile) that is a "Needs Improvement" high school basically because it has many African-Americans and free and reduced lunch students. Ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TailgateTom
Hell, there's one US News & World Report Silver Medal winner (90-95th percentile) that is a "Needs Improvement" high school basically because it has many African-Americans and free and reduced lunch students. Ridiculous.
Yeah, both schools I was talking about were Silver Medal winners too. Odd to say the least.
 
We had good schools before diversity.
Yes, we did. They had to lower academic standards for all so that the "diversers" wouldn't be seen as unable to compete. Seems that the anti-integrationists were right.
 
A report card Iowa officials said would more accurately measure school performance was released Wednesday morning, but within six hours they vowed to revise a section criticized by state and national civil rights leaders.

The Iowa Department of Education released its new school report card and searchable Web tool a week after President Barack Obama signed a federal law giving states more autonomy to govern K-12 school improvement and accountability.

The report card was touted as more accurate than the previous system of measuring school performance. But a section that monitors efforts to improve the achievement of disadvantaged students did not explicitly measure the academic performance of black, Hispanic and other minority students.

“I don’t think that at any time, when we’re talking about the achievement gap, that race should be left out,” said state Rep. Ako Abdul Samad, D-Des Moines, who is black. “We need to focus on where the problem lies, and the achievement gap has always been among minorities.”

The department is still collecting and monitoring minority student performance, officials said, but that data was not part of how the achievement gap was measured in the report. Instead, the section focused on measuring the performance of students with disabilities, living in poverty or learning English.

After fielding inquiries from The Des Moines Register, corresponding with the governor’s office and discussing the issue internally Wednesday afternoon, education department spokeswoman Staci Hupp said officials decided to revisit that section.

“It’s something that deserves a second look,” she said.

The Every Student Succeeds Act vs. No Child Left Behind: What's changed?

State Rep. Ruth Ann Gaines, D-Des Moines, said she was glad the state was looking to revise the section, but was discouraged at the section's original form.

“It does not surprise me that they would not think of race as a primary component of measuring the achievement gap,” said Gaines, who is black and has previously been named Iowa's teacher of the year. "To get a group of Iowa educators together who have not dealt with minority issues, they’re not going to think about it.”

Gaines reiterated her call for more minority representation on education committees and in other state decisions, saying that in her 40 years teaching she’s often been the only African-American present during such discussions.

How the report card came to be
Despite the Every Student Succeeds Act becoming federal law last week, Iowa’s new report card has been more than two years in the making. The state department of education was tasked with creating a new school ranking system as part of comprehensive education reform legislation approved in 2013.

The goal was to develop a more holistic and fair way of measuring school performance, one that gave schools credit for helping struggling students catch up to peers, while also holding students to the standard of being college-ready.

Extensive discussion and review went into developing the ranking system, with a team that included teachers, administrators, and education groups, said Jay Pennington, the education department's chief of information and analysis.

They discussed at length which student groups to include in the new achievement gap measure, and ultimately relied on a 2012 state report for guidance, Pennington said.

The 2012 analysis reviewed the academic performance of minority students who were also low-income, learning English or had a disability, as well as minority students who did not fall into those categories.

The review found that black and Hispanic students in the “non-challenged group,” as the state called it, performed at lower academic rates when compared to their white peers. But the gap in the "non-challenged group" was smaller than the gap minority students in poverty, with a disability, or learning English faced.

“It doesn’t account for all the difference in the achievement, but it goes very, very far in explaining the difference,” Pennington said..

Martin Carnoy, a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, said national analysis also shows minority students perform at lower levels than white peers, even when controlling for poverty, gender and which states student live in.

“If you don’t include race, you’re not going to pick up the gap,” he said.

Federal, state laws being watched
National civil rights groups have closely watched federal legislation to ensure that ethnic and racial minority student achievement continues to be included in state accountability measures.

Some feared such requirements would be watered down or eliminated in the law that replaces No Child Left Behind.

Luis Torres, director of policy at the League of United Latin American Citizens, said the new federal law included such provisions, and groups like his are monitoring how states are implementing new systems.

“This is certainly a good step,” he said of the decision to revise Iowa’s section on the achievement gap. “I hope they do it for every single measure, because the law requires that they do it for every single measure.”

Tracking, reporting and holding schools accountable for minority student achievement has a contentious history, others said.

Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, cities like Chicago refused to report academic performance by race, prompting some advocates to sneak into classrooms to count students, said Gary Orfield, a co-director of The Civil Rights Project at UCLA.

That gave minority and advocacy communities information they needed to challenge education conditions. “It’s really important,” Orfield said. “You can’t really enforce civil rights laws without knowing what’s happening.”

Reached mid-day Wednesday, Orfield urged state leaders to reconsider, saying: “I think it’s a bad mistake for Iowa.”

A few hours later, Gov. Terry Branstad’s office told The Register that the report card will be revisited.

Hupp, the education department’s spokeswoman, said late Wednesday the report was intended to serve as a “foundation” to establish metrics in which to work from.

She also noted that states have 18 months to meet new requirements under the ESSA, the new federal education law.

“We’ll have to adjust the course to ensure that we’re following both the Iowa requirement and the federal one,” she said. “This is our first run at the system.”

How Iowa's schools will be measured
Iowa’s new school report card aims to give parents and community members a detailed explanation of their community’s educational experiences, including an easy-to-understand and search Web tool, officials said.

The Iowa School Report Card was designed after lawmakers adopted comprehensive education reform legislation in 2013, tasking the department with developing an evaluation process for schools with specific metrics.

The report card released Wednesday includes rankings in eight areas:

Proficiency: The percentage of students scoring proficient or better on state reading and mathematics assessments.

College and Career-Ready Growth: The percentage of students who are making the year-to-year growth necessary to be ready for college and career training by the end of high school.

Annual Expected Growth: The percentage of students making a year of academic growth in a year’s time on state reading and mathematics assessments.

Closing Achievement Gap: A measure that reflects a statewide goal of narrowing the gap in achievement for students with disabilities, students who are eligible for free and reduced-price meals, and English Language Learners. (This is the section that state officials said Wednesday would be revisited.)

College and Career Readiness: The percentage of students who score at or above a level of performance on reading and mathematics assessments that predicts a higher probability of postsecondary success. (Middle/high schools only.)

Graduation Rate: The percentage of ninth-grade students who finished high school within five years. (High schools only.)

Attendance: The average daily attendance of students, which is the total number of days students were enrolled and present divided by the total number of possible attendance days.

Staff Retention: The percentage of teachers, school administrators and other licensed staff members who remained employed in a school over consecutive school years.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...owa-releases-new-school-report-card/77414888/
 
My kids' school also apparently got dinged for teacher retention because a new elementary school opened, took our principal, and raided some teachers. All in all a pretty misleading formula they use.
 
Yes, we did. They had to lower academic standards for all so that the "diversers" wouldn't be seen as unable to compete. Seems that the anti-integrationists were right.


So true. You are still protected by your location. You should visit Detroit, Camden, or North pHilly. THey look like post apocalyptic wastelands.

If blacks really want diversity then why don't they clean up their neighborhoods and make them attractive to outsiders?
 
Yes, we did. They had to lower academic standards for all so that the "diversers" wouldn't be seen as unable to compete. Seems that the anti-integrationists were right.

A) Many state school systems are actually in not as dire a situation as many claim, especially when taking into consideration that we are by far the most culturally complex and heterogeneous country in the top 50. For example, our lowest ranking was in math at 35th in the world. Yet that still outranks Sweden, Hungary, Israel, Qatar, UAE, Lithuania, Costa Rica, and Thailand among others. Countries with far more resources they devote to education. Our 23rd world ranking in science is impressive. That is better than Norway, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Sweden, Iceland, Luxembourg, and all the rest already mentioned that we outpace in math. It is only one spot behind Denmark and five behind Belgium. Two countries often looked at as model performers.

B) Yes, the fact that diversity affects our scores internationally should assumes that it has dragged down the achievement of all. But if we look at the achievement gap between whites and blacks, we know that this is not the case. In fact, our international ranking has been RISING in the last three decades. In fact, Americas fastest growing ethnic minority is Asians. They are also are highest achieving students. So the question could be asked: is forcing Asian students to go to school with inferior Caucasian students unfairly effecting them?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT