I never said that. You said the problem was 400 million guns. I asked what the numbers were from time-periods where gun violence wasn't nearly as high is it is today. You said you're weren't interested. In subsequent posts, I shared links where gun ownership has declined. So, if we have less gun ownership, then that isn't the sole problem.
Now, we've beat the ever loving $hit out of this topic here on HROT and I've stated a million times that I'm all for gun reform (I strongly support it, in fact). I've also stated that my reasons are different than most. I want to limit gun access so that once that [guns] is out of the equation we, as a society, can focus on the real issue. Because I hate to tell you that once little Johnny no longer has access to a gun, little Johnny's desire to do harm will still be present (it it's not addressed).
EDITING FOR AFTERTHOUGHT:
A better way to put it is, I think we don't have a choice but to make drastic changes to gun laws because society has changed, not the guns. The guns were there by the millions in the 80s 90s 00s and we didn't have these type of issues. So, since no one wants to to figure out why people are shooting the hell out of each other, then we need to limit/prevent access.
A high-profile mass shooting at a Chicago suburb’s July 4 parade was the nation’s fourth in recent weeks.
www.themarshallproject.org