Let me give you an example. You responded to the poster who claimed this:
Patrick 14 assists and 7 turnovers
Keegan 8 assists and 14 turnovers
Looking at just those stats it would seem that Patrick is the better player, that's what the poster was trying to imply. Why did the poster do that, well, it was his feeling that other posters were dipshits. The poster was trying to prove something by using stats that fit his feeling.
Now let's look at all the stats for KM and PT. On a per game basis (from ESPN),
GP | MIN | FG% | 3P% | FT% | REB | AST | BLK | STL | PF | TO | PTS |
---|
PM
15 | 14.7 | 38.4 | 32.0 | 68.8 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 5.7 |
KM
15 | 14.8 | 57.8 | 38.1 | 78.3 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 6.7 |
Look at what the poster did, he/she picked the only two categories where PM was better than KM. Everything else has KM better than PM. So the poster actually used stats to push his agenda. In the end, it just makes the poster look like the dipshit. I'm not pushing for KM to get more minutes than PM, but I can certain see why others may "feel" that way based watching and looking at the stats.