This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
noThis teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
Sandfort isn’t one dimensional like Oglesby was. He works hard off the ball and is a decent rebounder and passer. He is a good player.This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
I'd rather see Bowen @ PG and Perkins at his natural position. I'd be willing to work through Bowen's growing pains. More upside in the long run. Bring PS off the bench at the 2 and 3.This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
Good defense to bootSandfort isn’t one dimensional like Oglesby was. He works hard off the ball and is a decent rebounder and passer. He is a good player.
nope. with Sandfort the offense is better spaced and more importantly the defense is better. They are switching 1-5 with Sandfort of the court which REALLY helps to cover up some of the defensive limitations of some our players. Also, Sandfort might be our 3rd best rebounder.I'd rather see Bowen @ PG and Perkins at his natural position. I'd be willing to work through Bowen's growing pains. More upside in the long run. Bring PS off the bench at the 2 and 3.
I like Dasonte and Ahron off the bench. Both can score and are a nice change of pace. That said, if Tony is injured or needs more rest during the game because of his leg injury, they I like either of them being the primary ball handlers with Tony at the 2 instead of Sandford. Takes a lot of the pressure off of Tony, less stress handling the ball and chasing other quick guards. But noremally I like Tony at PG because he is strong enough to really bother quick guards.I'd rather see Bowen @ PG and Perkins at his natural position. I'd be willing to work through Bowen's growing pains. More upside in the long run. Bring PS off the bench at the 2 and 3.
Ulis for now.I'd rather see Bowen @ PG and Perkins at his natural position. I'd be willing to work through Bowen's growing pains. More upside in the long run. Bring PS off the bench at the 2 and 3.
I shouldn’t think so based on his performance. Believe he hit some shots last night, including a three. Seems to have a well rounded game and is a good rebounder and occasional shot blocker. Do you not watch very much basketball?This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
Bowen has a ton of upside, but Ulis is the better all around option at the moment given his strength, defense, limited turnovers and rebounding.
I have to think so. He was good for us last year, so I figure it's a matter of time until he finds his stroke again.Sandfort had proven himself last year to be a game day great shooter. His shot will return.
Good defense to boot
Also hits everything in big ten tournament championship game, so there’s that.This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
Yeah, I hear you, and I never said NOT to play Bowen. We are not particularly deep, so he should get 12-15 minutes per game guaranteed, plus more in some games.The good NCAA tourney teams go with Freshmen early, live with the growing pains, and by NCAA tourney time
they are better off. Bowen upside >> Ulis. That said, Fran has to worry about PT for both of them because either can transfer out after this season if they are unhappy with PT. That is today's ncaa reality.
My guess is Sandfort's shot comes around...he is not getting a lot of opportunities and ends up hunting more difficult shots and getting off to bad starts. He does play defense and pass..so still contributing.
This. Fran tried to reward PS by putting him in the starting line up. BUT with Kris and Pmac in the game, that puts him at the 2, and he's NOT a 2, especially defensively. I'd probably start Ulis and give Bowen more minutes at both spots and move Tony back to the 2. PS first guy in at the 3 and a few at 4. Not the 2. Rotate Ulis, Bowen, and TP at the guard spots, with Dix spotting a few minutes where possible.I'd rather see Bowen @ PG and Perkins at his natural position. I'd be willing to work through Bowen's growing pains. More upside in the long run. Bring PS off the bench at the 2 and 3.
They weren't switching last night.nope. with Sandfort the offense is better spaced and more importantly the defense is better. They are switching 1-5 with Sandfort of the court which REALLY helps to cover up some of the defensive limitations of some our players. Also, Sandfort might be our 3rd best rebounder.
I like Bowen a lot and he will play a important role, but our best line-up to start games is the current line-up. imho
Hes not a 2 in any capacity.This. Fran dried to reward PS by putting him in the starting line up. BUT with Kris and Pmac in the game, that puts him at the 2, and he's NOT a 2, especially defensively. I'd probably start Ulis and give Bowen more minutes at both spots and move Tony back to the 2. PS first guy in at the 3 and a few at 4. Not the 2. Rotate Ulis, Bowen, and TP at the guard spots, with Dix spotting a few minutes where possible.
This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
Is Gogetr this boards Oglesby? Hits everything in his mind? (Sarcasm, kinda)This teams Oglesby? Hits everything in practice?
Oglesby was also a good passer and a very good close-out defender, which is why he continued to get minutes, even as he couldn’t hit the broad side of a barnSandfort isn’t one dimensional like Oglesby was. He works hard off the ball and is a decent rebounder and passer. He is a good player.
I think the really good freshmen in the tourney are very highly ranked coming out of high school for the most part, so that they are playing early isn't a shock. And many have highly ranked players around them. Iowa doesn't have those super highly ranked players so they usually need development in one area or another, at least initially in their careers here.The good NCAA tourney teams go with Freshmen early, live with the growing pains, and by NCAA tourney time
they are better off. Bowen upside >> Ulis. That said, Fran has to worry about PT for both of them because either can transfer out after this season if they are unhappy with PT. That is today's ncaa reality.
My guess is Sandfort's shot comes around...he is not getting a lot of opportunities and ends up hunting more difficult shots and getting off to bad starts. He does play defense and pass..so still contributing.
I agree with your overall premise. Its not an either or, both will get good minutes.I think the really good freshmen in the tourney are very highly ranked coming out of high school for the most part, so that they are playing early isn't a shock. And many have highly ranked players around them. Iowa doesn't have those super highly ranked players so they usually need development in one area or another, at least initially in their careers here.
Dasonte was a 3 star, same as Ahron. He'll come along but Ahron is 2 years ahead, MUCH stronger, 2" taller, and knows where he and everyone else should be on both ends of the court.
There are probably 50 people in the crowd that can shoot better than him. That's not an exaggeration.this is now more than a funk, he’s been awful all year long
I’m starting to believe he’s a wasted scholarship
His shot hasn't looked good for quite a while.His shot/shots look good. Jo never looked good
Don’t mistake quick release for bad form.His shot hasn't looked good for quite a while.
He rushes it and you can see it's rushed as soon as it's released.
He did look sharp getting his dunk attempt packed.
Was told release is part of form. Kid has bad form right nowDon’t mistake quick release for bad form.
Quick release that pushes hard right is definitely bad form. At this point I think he has to play the slice and try to fix it in the off season.Don’t mistake quick release for bad form.