ADVERTISEMENT

Join the "Good Guys" and defend yourself from the terrorists!

CDBQWI4VAAADN7C.jpg
 
What is the NRA doing to combat terrorism? I didn't see it in the ad, looked like one of those Detroit revival ads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
A rifle behind every blade of grass would significantly deter foreign and domestic terrorists.
 
I understand true freedom fighters can enlist with the Kurds. I'll miss all the brave posters here.

LOL at you.

Why would anyone want to lose a drop of blood in that God forsaken place of the world.

Seal the borders, and stop illegal immigration and LEGAL immigration. That's right, stop legal immigration!

Then actively hunt down the terrorists that are presently living among us.

Until then, individual citizens must watch their own back, because no one else is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HallofFame
How is that combating terrorism? And how is the NRA in a position to "allow" or disallow it?

Y'all are getting ridiculous.

You are naïve. The NRA lobby plays a tremendous role in maintaining the rights of Americans.

As far as allowing carry and combatting terror, flashback to Paris. Terrorist shoots up restaurant and a woman hides by the door. The terrorist sees her hiding and causally walks up to her and tries to kill her but his gun jams. He leaves and she lives. Very lucky.

Now assume the weapon does not malfunction. As the terrorist approaches, good guy who is allowed to carry can put two to the chest and one to the head. Scumbag dies, good guy lives.
 
You are naïve. The NRA lobby plays a tremendous role in maintaining the rights of Americans.

As far as allowing carry and combatting terror, flashback to Paris. Terrorist shoots up restaurant and a woman hides by the door. The terrorist sees her hiding and causally walks up to her and tries to kill her but his gun jams. He leaves and she lives. Very lucky.

Now assume the weapon does not malfunction. As the terrorist approaches, good guy who is allowed to carry can put two to the chest and one to the head. Scumbag dies, good guy lives.


Just think if people in the theater killings had guns. There would be a lot more blood lost and people would be firing their guns hysterically at each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trevor4Iowa
The taking off of the shoes was happening before the shoe bomber, but nice try.

Really?

December 22, 2001
Richard Reid tries to ignite explosives hidden in his shoes on a flight from Paris to Miami. As a result, TSA begins randomly searching people’s shoes. Somewhere, J. Edgar Hoover is sad he missed this.
September 16, 2004
Passengers are required to remove their jackets before going through security. Those without boarding passes are no longer allowed past security checkpoints, and embarrassing “Welcome Home” signs are sadly now relegated to baggage claim.
December 17, 2004
Butane lighters are banned from being carried onto planes.
March 31, 2005
All lighters are banned from commercial airplanes.
August 10, 2006
TSA mandates that all shoes be removed when going through security.

https://www.thrillist.com/travel/na...es-off-at-airport-security-history-of-the-tsa
 
Just think if people in the theater killings had guns. There would be a lot more blood lost and people would be firing their guns hysterically at each other.
Why don't you just make something up and go with that.

Oh wait...
 
What is the NRA doing to combat terrorism? I didn't see it in the ad, looked like one of those Detroit revival ads.
Another thing I didn't see in the ad was the same government that is disarming the world in 2am no knock raids and carpet-bombing whole continents (many times from those heroic video drone operators in the basements of New Mexico), is the same one that "won't let a good crisis go to waste".
 
Stand and fight by flooding the streets with even more guns, making it easier for killers to get guns, and asking ordinary citizens to fight armed terrorists instead of having Congress actually getting off their ass to do something? How co-opted have you become in your life to buy into this shit?
 
You are naïve. The NRA lobby plays a tremendous role in maintaining the rights of Americans.

As far as allowing carry and combatting terror, flashback to Paris. Terrorist shoots up restaurant and a woman hides by the door. The terrorist sees her hiding and causally walks up to her and tries to kill her but his gun jams. He leaves and she lives. Very lucky.

Now assume the weapon does not malfunction. As the terrorist approaches, good guy who is allowed to carry can put two to the chest and one to the head. Scumbag dies, good guy lives.
Bullshit. The NRA doesn't care about gun safety anymore. The majority of their money comes from gun advertising. All they are now is a front to sell guns. They've suckered you. Why can't you see this?
 
The NRA stands for guns for everyone and making money.

Guns for everyone is not working out so well. Good guys and bad guys get guns. BTW, good guys must really suck at playing guns. For all the dudes that have them, they're making no difference.
 
The NRA stands for guns for everyone and making money.

Guns for everyone is not working out so well. Good guys and bad guys get guns. BTW, good guys must really suck at playing guns. For all the dudes that have them, they're making no difference.
Nor the cops for that matter. They have been militarized. Should we disarm them as well? After all, they arrive AFTER the crime has been committed.
 
The NRA stands for guns for everyone and making money.

Guns for everyone is not working out so well. Good guys and bad guys get guns. BTW, good guys must really suck at playing guns. For all the dudes that have them, they're making no difference.
Really? Violent crime including gun crime has been cut in half in the last 20 years. Homicide rates are less than half of what they were in 1993. Something seems to be going right.
 
Why don't you just make something up and go with that.

Oh wait...

What do you think would happen if people in a dark theater were armed? Would they use their gun to save lives? Would they be able to identify the shooter? Im guessing if your fired your gun at the shooter, you would be mistaken for the shooter and would be killed by a NRA member by accident.

Btw, what did I make up? It was a "what if" statement.
 
LOL at you.

Why would anyone want to lose a drop of blood in that God forsaken place of the world.

Seal the borders, and stop illegal immigration and LEGAL immigration. That's right, stop legal immigration!

Then actively hunt down the terrorists that are presently living among us.

Until then, individual citizens must watch their own back, because no one else is.
So, you are volunteering to go the Southern border and shoot illegals for us?
 
Why don't you just make something up and go with that.

Oh wait...

How is that different than the gun owning lunatics that just assume it's all roses when we have 100 million vigilantes around the country, shooting any "bad guys" they see?

Go ahead with your (your = all vigilante nuts) fantasy and keep making up stories about how safe we are when half cocked lunatics get to play army.

Most of the fringe right is basically calling for tribal living and being controlled by warlords. So damn dumb.
 
Allowing people to practice their right to protect themselves.

To what degree? Why do you need an assault rifle that unloads 40 rounds a minute or a grenade launcher? What do you need to kill that much? Isn't a handgun, a shotgun enough?

We already have time place and manner restrictions on the first amendment. We have countless exceptions to the fourth amendment, Why should the second be this sacred cow with no restrictions?
 
How is that different than the gun owning lunatics that just assume it's all roses when we have 100 million vigilantes around the country, shooting any "bad guys" they see?

Go ahead with your (your = all vigilante nuts) fantasy and keep making up stories about how safe we are when half cocked lunatics get to play army.

Most of the fringe right is basically calling for tribal living and being controlled by warlords. So damn dumb.
Liar
 
To what degree? Why do you need an assault rifle that unloads 40 rounds a minute or a grenade launcher? What do you need to kill that much? Isn't a handgun, a shotgun enough?

We already have time place and manner restrictions on the first amendment. We have countless exceptions to the fourth amendment, Why should the second be this sacred cow with no restrictions?
The SCOTUS decided in US vs Miller in 1939 that a weapon could be restricted if and only if it had no connection to military or militia activity. Your problem with trying to ban these rifles for being military type weapons is that they are in fact military type weapons. These bans would never withstand a challenge in the Supreme Court and could take the fully automatic restrictions with them.
 
How is that different than the gun owning lunatics that just assume it's all roses when we have 100 million vigilantes around the country, shooting any "bad guys" they see?

Go ahead with your (your = all vigilante nuts) fantasy and keep making up stories about how safe we are when half cocked lunatics get to play army.

Most of the fringe right is basically calling for tribal living and being controlled by warlords. So damn dumb.
Way to double down on it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT