An Arizona judge on Friday ruled from the bench against Abe Hamadeh, the unsuccessful Republican candidate for state attorney general who claimed that improper adjudication of ballots and other errors cost him the election and who had asked to be declared the winner.
Hamadeh lost to Democrat Kris Mayes by 511 votes, a narrow margin that triggered an automatic recount, the results of which are expected later this month. But the ruling against Hamadeh in his lawsuit all but guarantees that Mayes will be inaugurated next year.
Judge Lee F. Jantzen of Mohave County Superior Court told Hamadeh’s lawyer, Timothy La Sota, “You just haven’t proven your case.”
By the end of the single-day trial, La Sota acknowledged that he had no proof of errors or misconduct affecting a sufficient number of votes to swing the results and instead requested that the judge simply adjust the vote count to reflect 14 ballots he claimed were in question because of adjudication errors. The judge refused to do so, saying it was beyond the court’s purview in deciding an election contest.
Charlie Kirk delivers a warning to the RNC, and sparks a backlash
Lawyers for Mayes and for the secretary of state’s office condemned La Sota for bringing a case they said was frivolous. Dan Barr, an attorney for Mayes, said he would ask the court to impose sanctions on Hamadeh’s counsel.
ADVERTISING
In 37 years of practicing law, Barr said, he had “never been involved in such a gigantic waste of time as this case.”
“The judiciary and the bar needs to step up to the plate here and to sanction this conduct,” he added. “It has gone too far for too long.”
Andy Gaona, an attorney for the secretary of state’s office, called the proceedings a “spectacular waste of everyone’s time.”
For Clarence Thomas and architect of Trump’s Jan. 6 legal strategy, an intellectual kinship goes back decades
La Sota, for his part, acknowledged even before the judge’s ruling that he had not proved his case, saying of election contests, “They’re often not successful.” He said he might have done better had he been given more time to gather evidence. He said he showed certain ballot adjudication errors and maintained that there was public value in bringing such a case to instill confidence in the results.
“We pled a complaint in good faith,” La Sota told the court.
Hamadeh lost to Democrat Kris Mayes by 511 votes, a narrow margin that triggered an automatic recount, the results of which are expected later this month. But the ruling against Hamadeh in his lawsuit all but guarantees that Mayes will be inaugurated next year.
Judge Lee F. Jantzen of Mohave County Superior Court told Hamadeh’s lawyer, Timothy La Sota, “You just haven’t proven your case.”
By the end of the single-day trial, La Sota acknowledged that he had no proof of errors or misconduct affecting a sufficient number of votes to swing the results and instead requested that the judge simply adjust the vote count to reflect 14 ballots he claimed were in question because of adjudication errors. The judge refused to do so, saying it was beyond the court’s purview in deciding an election contest.
Charlie Kirk delivers a warning to the RNC, and sparks a backlash
Lawyers for Mayes and for the secretary of state’s office condemned La Sota for bringing a case they said was frivolous. Dan Barr, an attorney for Mayes, said he would ask the court to impose sanctions on Hamadeh’s counsel.
ADVERTISING
In 37 years of practicing law, Barr said, he had “never been involved in such a gigantic waste of time as this case.”
“The judiciary and the bar needs to step up to the plate here and to sanction this conduct,” he added. “It has gone too far for too long.”
Andy Gaona, an attorney for the secretary of state’s office, called the proceedings a “spectacular waste of everyone’s time.”
For Clarence Thomas and architect of Trump’s Jan. 6 legal strategy, an intellectual kinship goes back decades
La Sota, for his part, acknowledged even before the judge’s ruling that he had not proved his case, saying of election contests, “They’re often not successful.” He said he might have done better had he been given more time to gather evidence. He said he showed certain ballot adjudication errors and maintained that there was public value in bringing such a case to instill confidence in the results.
“We pled a complaint in good faith,” La Sota told the court.
