Sounds like he just inked a 5 year deal.
I like the signing for them. Good hire
I like the signing for them. Good hire
Sounds like he just inked a 5 year deal.
I like the signing for them. Good hire
He was!Was he one of the fab five or am I thinking of someone else?
Not good he will GET PLAYERS.......... Just look at Memphis!
Assistants with the Xs and Os experience will be critical.Howard will make it easy to recruit top players. To be successful, he will need to hire some top assistants with coaching experience. both on and off the court. No head coaching experience and only an assistant for Miami Heat in the pros, so his resume as a coach is pretty thin.
Many want him to bring back the 'culture' to UM. Not sure he's that type of guy anymore, but that type of culture wouldn't be good for UM or the B1G. That would be the opposite end of the spectrum compared to Beilein.
Assistants with the Xs and Os experience will be critical.
As recruiting is such a big part of the job, probably the most important thing, I can't really criticize the choice.
If BJ Armstrong had any interest at all in coaching Iowa I would at least want him considered for the same reasons.
Not saying he won't. But one thing Penny Hardaway had going for him was he was coaching HS and AAU ball for a few years and his AAU team was loaded with talent from the local Memphis area including one of if not the top guy in next years class.
No clue if he's a good hire but he has big shoes to fill with Beilen who I thought was the best and maybe most likeable coach in the conference. Lastly seeing a Fab 5 guy get a head coaching job makes me feel old.
Not so sure he is a great hire. I think he will be a very good recruiter and not so good coaching Michigan to wins. I just have never been impressed with Howard. JMO
Not referring to coaching, I do not know anything about his coaching. I did not care for him even when he was player.What about his coaching have you like and disliked?
This is where my thoughts are as well. Getting talent is a significantly more important part of the equation in building a team for a deep tourney run.Probably a good hire, with at least some risk (there is always some risk). Basketball in college is more and more about acquiring talent, and less and less about player development and X's and O's. By the time his recruits get to Michigan, they will be ready to go.
And so why weren’t you impressed with him? All American? Just curiousNot so sure he is a great hire. I think he will be a very good recruiter and not so good coaching Michigan to wins. I just have never been impressed with Howard. JMO
How soon before we get to the point where the kids being recruited have no idea who BJ is (crap I'm old)? I totally get your point, and saying you played with the best ever certainly leaves an impression, but just saying.
He was interviewed for the Timberwolves head coaching position a couple weeks ago, so he has a good reputation in the NBA.Wow. Going from Belein to Howard is shocking. A wealth of experience to almost none, and only as an assistant in the NBA. I am really curious to see how this works for them...
Still, he may have a good reputation but he lacks any D1 coaching experience. Not saying he won't be successful, it just seems like a huge risk on MI's part.He was interviewed for the Timberwolves head coaching position a couple weeks ago, so he has a good reputation in the NBA.
He could be really damn good, and if he gets compared to Beilein, people will probably be disappointed. Are people forgetting what the guy that was there two weeks ago did? Their last coach was incredible.
Bring the culture back? What exactly is wrong with the current culture?
I don't know if he can coach a lick, but I wouldn't bet against his ability to bring in high level recruits.
Still, he may have a good reputation but he lacks any D1 coaching experience. Not saying he won't be successful, it just seems like a huge risk on MI's part.
I wonder what the success rate is for former players who had no D1 coaching experience coming back as head coach of their alma mater. I would think that Hoiberg is more the exception than the rule.Fred Hoiberg had zero experience before the ISU job ... worked out (while he was there). Clyde Drexler had zero experience before Houston job .. was a disaster. This will be interesting.
Fred Hoiberg had zero experience before the ISU job ... worked out (while he was there). Clyde Drexler had zero experience before Houston job .. was a disaster. This will be interesting.
I wonder what the success rate is for former players who had no D1 coaching experience coming back as head coach of their alma mater. I would think that Hoiberg is more the exception than the rule.
Hoiberg really is the exception to the rule for this. I've also found the culture arguments to be odd. The fallout from the Fab 5/Chris Webber stuff put Michigan in basketball purgatory for a decade, and it took Beilein to dig them out. I wasn't aware that Michigan hoops needed a culture overhaul.
He might well turn out to be a good coach, only time will tell. But Michigan is a top 10 program currently, there wasn't a high-profile, proven coach they could have gotten?