ADVERTISEMENT

Kade Blume

Kid is in BIG trouble. Class C felony. 1st court appearance is November 28th. The other wrestlers who witnessed this ratted him out so it's hard to fathom he will be on the team. There has to be some code of conduct.
 
I'm from this area originally. The Story County attorney don't play so this isn't going away.
 
Wow . . . all I am going to say is I understand this is a message board, however, I don't think this is a topic to be joking about.

We are talking about a wrestler that raped a teammate with a pencil. Come on guys, grow up.
 
The fallout of this young man’s actions could last for a really long time. If convicted of this or a possible lesser charge that’s sexual in nature he will more than likely have to register as a sex offender as well for a minimum of 10 years. Good luck with a good college, wrestling or quality job for that matter. A stupid prank could be life altering for this young man.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OILCHECKER
This type of stuff is beyond cringeworthy. I am not a big fan of hazing, period. But, I just can't understand even CONSIDERING inserting something into someone else's private areas against their will, let alone actually DOING it.

It's beyond stupid, it absolutely is criminal. By all acounts, Steveson was very fortunate to be able to ever wrestle again for his part in something(that at least was reported as) quite similar...
 
So he has been practicing with his team and just plead guilty to the juvenile charges..
 
Well he wrestled at Saydel on Saturday. What a ****ed up school systems.
Absolutely agree. The superintendent's name is Matt Patton and he's a gutless turd. His claim is that since it didn't happen on school property and he hasn't been "convicted" he can't suspend. Obviously the code of conduct policies at Roland Story are a catch me if you can mentality
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muscles1989
Wow . . . all I am going to say is I understand this is a message board, however, I don't think this is a topic to be joking about.

We are talking about a wrestler that raped a teammate with a pencil. Come on guys, grow up.
Actually I don't see anyone making any jokes or humor about this. Every post before yours was informative in discussing what happened and showed no humor or joking of any manner. Did you see something I didn't?
 
Absolutely agree. The superintendent's name is Matt Patton and he's a gutless turd. His claim is that since it didn't happen on school property and he hasn't been "convicted" he can't suspend. Obviously the code of conduct policies at Roland Story are a catch me if you can mentality
Innocent until proven guilty wow what a thing we use to live by. That's the way it should be. This is America still. F cancel culture
 
Absolutely agree. The superintendent's name is Matt Patton and he's a gutless turd. His claim is that since it didn't happen on school property and he hasn't been "convicted" he can't suspend. Obviously the code of conduct policies at Roland Story are a catch me if you can mentality
How in the hell could I get caught off school property with alcohol and still code of conduct applied to me. That school system it a joke.
 
Absolutely agree. The superintendent's name is Matt Patton and he's a gutless turd. His claim is that since it didn't happen on school property and he hasn't been "convicted" he can't suspend. Obviously the code of conduct policies at Roland Story are a catch me if you can mentality
While he may or may not be what you are calling him, I can pretty much guarantee what he is saying is from the school district's attorney. There are plenty of situations where the case appears to be lock tight but certain factors will affect what the district can or can't do.
 
So code of conduct doesn't apply to this kid?

My buddies and I were driving (two car loads of dudes) in downtown Tucson and entering a parking ramp. We were stopping by the prom to see where the parties were at. Went up the wrong way and lo and behold, Tucson’s finest were waiting. They searched our car and found beer. Marched us down to the prom to our principal and vice principal. They assured the cops we would face punishment Monday morning. Long story short, they couldn’t do anything.
 
My buddies and I were driving (two car loads of dudes) in downtown Tucson and entering a parking ramp. We were stopping by the prom to see where the parties were at. Went up the wrong way and lo and behold, Tucson’s finest were waiting. They searched our car and found beer. Marched us down to the prom to our principal and vice principal. They assured the cops we would face punishment Monday morning. Long story short, they couldn’t do anything.
Not sure how to post a screen shot of roland story's code of conduct but ya you're wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAChief32
As much a Is hate to say it, just being accused of something is not enough to punish a kid. The courts have not thrown him in jail and declared him guilty. That will probably happen after the trial.

The school should not be able to declare him guilty either. I am sure he is being treated like a pariah and he is being avoided by many people, but still the school cannot punish him until something is settled in court.
 
How in the hell could I get caught off school property with alcohol and still code of conduct applied to me. That school system it a joke.
I am guessing because you were caught and convicted. Either by paying a fine or whatever. There is no conviction in this instance, so we have to let the slow wheels of justice turn. Hopefully they will reach the correct decision.
 
I am guessing because you were caught and convicted. Either by paying a fine or whatever. There is no conviction in this instance, so we have to let the slow wheels of justice turn. Hopefully they will reach the correct decision.
No my code of conduct was enforced before I even plead guilty. The school enforced code of conduct with their own judgment.
 
Pretty sure schools can suspend kids or make them ineligible without the kid actually being found guilty, per most of their policies. If you think about it, most arrests for serious crimes don't result in immediate trials/pleas/convictions. Most take several months to actually get resolved and an athlete/parent could drag this out until season is over or the kids eligibility is exhausted if they wanted to. If a crime is serious enough, most schools can and some will use their discretionary to make the kid sit.
 
Actually I don't see anyone making any jokes or humor about this. Every post before yours was informative in discussing what happened and showed no humor or joking of any manner. Did you see something I didn't?
Look in the OP, where it says “Last edited by a moderator”. There were probably subsequent posts that were deleted entirely.
 
My buddies and I were driving (two car loads of dudes) in downtown Tucson and entering a parking ramp. We were stopping by the prom to see where the parties were at. Went up the wrong way and lo and behold, Tucson’s finest were waiting. They searched our car and found beer. Marched us down to the prom to our principal and vice principal. They assured the cops we would face punishment Monday morning. Long story short, they couldn’t do anything.
Uhh - minor in possession of alcohol and rape are not the same. Plus, when a kid gets caught w/ alcohol they automatically lose 20-40% of the next sport they are participating in (at least in most districts).
 
As much a Is hate to say it, just being accused of something is not enough to punish a kid. The courts have not thrown him in jail and declared him guilty. That will probably happen after the trial.

The school should not be able to declare him guilty either. I am sure he is being treated like a pariah and he is being avoided by many people, but still the school cannot punish him until something is settled in court.
This happens to be correct...unless it happened on school property or at a school-sponsored event in which case the school can act to protect other students or school property, usually with a temporary suspension pending an expulsion hearing.
 
Last edited:
since it didn't happen on school property and he hasn't been "convicted" he can't suspend
I fought a kid immediately after school off school property. It was a widely attended event. I met the kid before school the next day. I told him that since we both lived near enough and walked to school, so we both walked home before we met up to fight.
Innocent until proven guilty
So we conspired to lie. We were called into the principal's office that morning. We stuck to our story. We were guilty but evaded punishment.
When was the last time you were in a school?
Public school May 1981. But this happened in 1977. Back then the school considered students their responsibility until students were safely home. The responsibility wasn't limited to the school property. Similar responsibility was extended for official school events regardless of their location. I doubt this has changed and believe it likely the norm of most schools.
 
As much a Is hate to say it, just being accused of something is not enough to punish a kid. The courts have not thrown him in jail and declared him guilty. That will probably happen after the trial.

The school should not be able to declare him guilty either. I am sure he is being treated like a pariah and he is being avoided by many people, but still the school cannot punish him until something is settled in court.
They probably can because it's not a right to participate in extra curricular activities.
 
As much a Is hate to say it, just being accused of something is not enough to punish a kid. The courts have not thrown him in jail and declared him guilty. That will probably happen after the trial.

The school should not be able to declare him guilty either. I am sure he is being treated like a pariah and he is being avoided by many people, but still the school cannot punish him until something is settled in court.
You would be wrong. Schools can and do punish kids quite regularly without an admission of guilt or conviction.
 
I fought a kid immediately after school off school property. It was a widely attended event. I met the kid before school the next day. I told him that since we both lived near enough and walked to school, so we both walked home before we met up to fight.

So we conspired to lie. We were called into the principal's office that morning. We stuck to our story. We were guilty but evaded punishment.

Public school May 1981. But this happened in 1977. Back then the school considered students their responsibility until students were safely home. The responsibility wasn't limited to the school property. Similar responsibility was extended for official school events regardless of their location. I doubt this has changed and believe it likely the norm of most schools.
Probably because you know it will be argued that way by a parent if somehow the school might be at fault in a different circumstance.
 
You would be wrong. Schools can and do punish kids quite regularly without an admission of guilt or conviction.
Absolutely correct. I have family members that are administrators and they can and do suspend especially when the evidence (and common sense) supports it. From what I understand there were multiple witnesses and a video. It's a disturbing situation
 
Probably because you know it will be argued that way by a parent if somehow the school might be at fault in a different circumstance.
Back then I was thinking only about not getting suspended and the likely parental wrath that I thought likely to ensue.

Now I think society is much more litigious and some school administrators simply prefer the path they perceive least litigious (i.e., less work for them or detrimental to their career).

School administrators are paid as management to protect the institution. Suspend the kid and parents may sue. Don't suspend the kid and those upset will have no standing and likely far less will and resources to sue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bourbon n blues
No my code of conduct was enforced before I even plead guilty. The school enforced code of conduct with their own judgment.
Well, then I have no answer to your question. All I can say is times are definitely different now. Things that seems very simple and straightforward sure seem to get all muddied up and complicated these days.
 
I fought a kid immediately after school off school property. It was a widely attended event. I met the kid before school the next day. I told him that since we both lived near enough and walked to school, so we both walked home before we met up to fight.

So we conspired to lie. We were called into the principal's office that morning. We stuck to our story. We were guilty but evaded punishment.

Public school May 1981. But this happened in 1977. Back then the school considered students their responsibility until students were safely home. The responsibility wasn't limited to the school property. Similar responsibility was extended for official school events regardless of their location. I doubt this has changed and believe it likely the norm of most schools.
Good conduct policies are applicable (I haven't heard of a district where this isn't the case) to any student, any location, any time of day.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT