ADVERTISEMENT

Kansas City declares itself a LGBTQ+ sanctuary city

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,506
58,999
113
Officials in Missouri’s largest city approved a resolution Thursday to declare it a sanctuary for people seeking or providing gender-affirming care, defying state lawmakers who voted a day earlier to ban such care for minors and restrict it for some adults.

Democratic Mayor Quinton Lucas praised the 12 to 1 vote, saying the city is committed to being a “welcoming, inclusive, and safe place for everyone, including our transgender and LGBTQ+ community.”




Kansas City’s new, sanctuary status sets it apart as a Democratic-leaning city in a state with a Republican governor and GOP-controlled Legislature. Similar actions have been taken in cities that oppose state actions to restrict rights for transgender people, as in Austin, Texas.

GOP Gov. Mike Parson is expected to sign into law the ban on gender-affirming care, joining at least 16 other states that have enacted similar laws restricting or banning such care for minors.




The resolution also comes as a judge considers a proposed emergency rule from Republican state Attorney General Andrew Bailey that would require adults and children to undergo more than a year of therapy — and fulfill other requirements before they could receive gender-affirming treatment.

A committee signed off Wednesday on the resolution, which says the city will not prosecute or fine any person or organization that seeks, provides, receives or helps someone to receive gender-affirming care such as as puberty blockers, hormones or surgery.



It also says that if the state passes a law or resolution that imposes criminal or civil punishments, fines, or professional sanctions in such cases, personnel in Missouri’s largest city will make enforcing those requirements “their lowest priority.”

Republican state lawmakers across the U.S. who’ve attacked gender-affirming care as part of a larger effort to roll back LGBTQ+ rights have argued that they’re protecting children from decisions they may later regret. But gender-affirming care for minors has been available in the U.S. for more than a decade and is endorsed by major medical associations.

“This is an important first step in Kansas City’s commitment to trans and nonbinary people,” Merrique Jenson, founder of Transformations KC, said in a written statement after the vote. “I look forward to trans leaders and Kansas City working together to address the health disparities in our communities and ways we can have sustainable funding & programming reaching all trans people.”
 
Good luck with that. Some arrogant city council members are about to fund out some hard truths. So will people that think a city can protect them from state level charges.
 
So...nothing to do with LGB or Q. Why not be a "T Sanctuary City"? Why do they always have to be a team?

My gay friends and family don't want the T, Q, etc crowd even associated with them. Makes sense when you consider those groups have nothing to do with sexual attraction and the Trans ideology is diametrically opposed to the classic ideas of the LGB folk. But they lean on these other groups and pretend they're all walking in lockstep to push these nonsense policies.
 
Good luck with that. Some arrogant city council members are about to fund out some hard truths. So will people that think a city can protect them from state level charges.
How do you feel about counties in Iowa declaring themselves second amendment sanctuaries?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
How do you feel about counties in Iowa declaring themselves second amendment sanctuaries?

66dddf75-fa96-41d5-9f78-97af97cf84a8_text.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32
How do you feel about strawman arguments and false equivalence?

People are done with the trans bullshit.
Either communities claiming sanctuary status for any issue is valid or no claim of sanctuary status is valid. Pick a side, there is no strawman involved.

Personally I'm done with the second amendment bullshit. More innocent people have suffered and/or died from the wrong people having weapons than anyone has from transgender issues.
 
Last edited:
Either communities claiming sanctuary status for any issue is valid or no claim of sanctuary status is valid. Pick a side, there is no strawman involved.

Personally I done with the second amendment bullshit. More innocent people have suffered and/or died from the wrong people having weapons than anyone has from transgender issues.
Go get the amendment overturned of stfu. I don't own any guns

Yes the majority of people are done with the trans bullshit.
 
Go get the amendment overturned of stfu. I don't own any guns

Yes the majority of people are done with the trans bullshit.
You still did answer my question about sanctuary status, is it okay for communities to declare or not?
 
Personally I done with the second amendment bullshit. More innocent people have suffered and/or died from the wrong people having weapons than anyone has from transgender issues.

Just because the trannies haven't picked YOU up off the street, to wheel you into an OR and lop off your schwang & throw a dress on you, doesn't mean it still couldn't happen to ANY of us!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gohawks50
don't know, feeding the supporters?
These are small time county politicians passing sanctuary status not people looking to further their political career. IMO they are doing so in fear of some kind of national gun regulation. In other words, they want to protect those rights even if the state or national government takes them away which is the same thing KC is doing for LGBTQ rights.
 
These are small time county politicians passing sanctuary status not people looking to further their political career. IMO they are doing so in fear of some kind of national gun regulation. In other words, they want to protect those rights even if the state or national government takes them away which is the same thing KC is doing for LGBTQ rights.
that's fair, but the 2nd amendment sanctuary has a greater chance of survival than the KC LGBTQ law
 
that's fair, but the 2nd amendment sanctuary has a greater chance of survival than the KC LGBTQ law
The second amendment sanctuary isn't needed so of course it will survive. KC by declaring LGBTQ sanctuary status is saying enforcement of anti LGBTQ laws will be a low priority for the city government.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT