ADVERTISEMENT

Koehn Missed FG

An electronic sensor that extends upward and can detect the plain being broken is what's needed.
Picture that sensor or laser mounted on the goalpost uprights. One on each side. On a windy day those uprights often become out of plumb. A ball that is obviously good to the inside of an upright could break that beam and register no-good. Would not affect a call like Saturday other than the upright would have been leaning enough to appear good.
 
Remember the ball must pass completely inside the goal post. If the ball passes above the post, it is deemed to be no good. Kind of an all or nothing type thing.

All the angles showed it was close, the person who had the best view was the gentlemen standing under neath the upright and he made the call. Ill trust his judgement because there is seriously no camera angle that can show otherwise.

I agree have lasers pointed toward the sky (airplanes would love that). iF the ball hits the laser then its no good.

Yeah I thought it was good but if it goes over the upright it is no good, I just couldn't believe the guy underneath looked at the other guy like he was asking him if it was good. I guess the only thing he could have seen was if it went between him and the upright but that clearly was the guy underneaths call.
 
I thought from some camera angles it looked good and others it didn't. What i didn't understand was the ref who was under the goalpost that the ball went over looked at the other ref before saying it wasn't good.
 
It seems to me the refs look at each other on every FG attempt....as noted above, probably to ensure they're both signalling the same thing.
 
This explains it really well.

Kicker Marshall Koehn looked like he might’ve made a 47-yard field goal early in the fourth quarter. The ball sailed high over the right upright. It was ruled wide right and no good. There wasn’t much argument from Iowa’s sideline, because those guys know rule NCAA football instant replay casebook.

“Section 3, Article 1-b of the case book states the following: “Field goal attempts (can be reviewed) if and only if the ball is ruled (b) inside or outside the uprights when it is lower than the top of the uprights. If the ball is higher than the top of the uprights as it crosses the end line, the play may not be reviewed.”

So, the Koehn kick wasn’t reviewable. You might remember Arizona State making one of these against Wisconsin in that crazy horrible officiated game from a few years ago at Arizona State.

I don’t get this rule. I vote for a change, but really, how do you know what’s good and what’s not over the upright?

http://www.thegazette.com/subject/sports/stat-pak-taxing-the-defense-20151116
 
Hologram goal posts with sensors.

smiley-cool05.gif
 
How about some taller goalposts?

So what is the story on our short goalposts, anyway? I'm guessing it's because the U of I likes to be able to fold them down onto the field so they never get torn down, and the taller ones can't be collapsed like that.

To my knowledge, Iowa is the only D1 program with those goofy-looking short goalposts. I'm not a fan. For a kick like Koehn's miss Saturday night, the ball might have bounced off the upright and through for a made FG.

Unless there's some other reason why the U of I insists on the stubby goalposts, I say let's get some big-boy goalposts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bladel
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT