What was with the lack of review on plays that definitely could have been changed in Iowa's favor?
Lack Of Review?
- Thread starter IowaHawkeyeFBnBB4Life
- Start date
I thought the same thing
The punt mistake. He was blocked into the ball.
The spot on the last drive giving them a first down instead of a fourth and short situation.
The punt mistake. He was blocked into the ball.
The spot on the last drive giving them a first down instead of a fourth and short situation.
This was discussed, due to Beyer initiating the block its on him.
The AJ sack is the big one to me.
not sure initiating the block has any thing to do with it , he was still pushed back a step.
BirdistheWord
HB Legend
I don't know, but they sure were quick on the review when a call went our way!
Just like they were in the 4th!
once upon a time if you were blocked into a punt it was not a fumble .blocked into the ball?
If communication occurred Beyer should have been far far away. The only chance Iowa had on that play was if the ball had stopped moving and was dead. The way he came into contact with the ball was immaterial. He screwed up.
51 did push beyer backwards a little after the initial block . when was AJ s sack and what was wrong ?
Still is a rule. If a receiving team player his blocked into the ball the touching is ignored.
Receiving team can’t block someone and touch the ball and that’s what Beyer did.
just watched the play again and beyer did engage 51 but he was pushed into the ball . i will admit it was not a big push .
Similar threads
