Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So my ideal temp of 70 F isn't too far from 62 C. What's the problem?
What is land temperature?
ThanksLand Surface Temperature
Land surface temperature (LST) is defined by the International LST and Emissivity Working Group as a measure of how hot or cold the surface of the Earth would feel to the touch.
From: Comprehensive Remote Sensing, 2018
Land Surface Temperature - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
www.sciencedirect.com
What is land temperature?
Thanks
i googles a bit after I posted. Sounds like this is a relatively new measurement?
No dot on forehead. We probably should look everywhere for it.
You are mistaking me for somebody else. You’ve never posted anything for me. I avoid 99% of global warming/climate threads because they devolve into deniers vs alarmists and it’s boring as hell, to be honest.Something that rises 2x faster than overall global warming temperatures.
Posted this for you many many times.
A +2°C increase in "global" temperatures is +3.6°F global temperatures.
But land temps go up 2x more, so +2°C global means +4°C land temperature increases.
Which means +7.2°F. And this is simply the "average". The greenhouse gas emissions we are creating will result in higher increases in some places than others. Which can easily mean +10°F increases where someone lives for "just" a +2°C rise overall.
And now, we're looking at temperature increases that could end up higher than +2°C globally, which is why climatologists have been telling you for years now that this can end up becoming a global catastrophe in the long run.
"alarmist"? With data like this, I would say they weren't being very "alarmist" at all. But ignoring them certainly works out well for everyone.You are mistaking me for somebody else. You’ve never posted anything for me. I avoid 99% of global warming/climate threads because they devolve into deniers vs alarmists and it’s boring as hell, to be honest.
Was just curious as I’ve never heard land surface temps being cited in this manner.
Oh, and way to help bring someone around to your POV. 🙄
Maybe, maybe not."alarmist"? With data like this, I would say they weren't being very "alarmist" at all. But ignoring them certainly works out well for everyone.
I think it is concerning to start measuring a new value and then say drastic changes need to be made based on the new value without knowing if this is normal.Thanks
i googles a bit after I posted. Sounds like this is a relatively new measurement? A couple articles I read said these figures might not be Completely accurate and need further investigation. Either way, sounds concerning.
What is crazy is it is the middle of spring.
In fairness, I was wrong to characterize it as a new measurement.I think it is concerning to start measuring a new value and then say drastic changes need to be made based on the new value without knowing if this is normal.
Ultimately, the change needed is to dramatically decrease pollution and stop destruction of nature. Of course this will never happen because our entire economic system is based on growth. And the easiest way to grow is by increasing the population.
Our earth is living and has the ability to heal itself if we stop destroying it. Nature is a delicate balance. Too much of one thing will and not enough of others will lead to destruction.
True or not, when I think of India I think of a hot smelly over populated mess.
they seem to be an intelligent society likely held back/retarded by their caste system.
nuclear energy seems to be needed world wide but nobody seems to have the willingness. Cars will take care of themselves as EV become better than ICE variety
India not too long ago had a higher % of the worlds economy than the US currently has. It was the largest economy in the world and was thriving.
What happened, you say? British colonialism raped the country and left it a poor second world country.
Sure, blame the white people. That's fashionable now days.
Of course data should be verified, but the satellite data is considered to be accurate based off past readings. Keep in mind, the satellite was measuring the temperature of the ground, not the air temperature. On the other hand, it's the end of April/early May. We haven't even reached the hot part of the summer for India yet (which from my understanding, is late May and early June).Maybe, maybe not.
From the article:
M Mohapatra, director general of IMD, said this data shouldn’t be trusted before conducting ground verification. “Satellite observations are taken from 36,000km away from the surface. They can be misleading if not verified. The record highest land temperature was taken in Rajasthan which was 52.6 degree C. This data can create fear and panic so we should act responsibly.”
“Do you know what 60 degrees C means? The roads and other infrastructure will melt. I have seen roads melting in Rajasthan at 50 degree C. We should be very careful and run ground assessments first,” added another scientist, who declined to be named.
No idea, I’m not a scientist. Just posted what the Indian scientist said.Of course data should be verified, but the satellite data is considered to be accurate based off past readings. Keep in mind, the satellite was measuring the temperature of the ground, not the air temperature. On the other hand, it's the end of April/early May. We haven't even reached the hot part of the summer for India yet (which from my understanding, is late May and early June).
Apparently so is crying like a little baby whenever somebody points out that some white people have done some pretty shitty things in history.
Apparently so is crying like a little baby whenever somebody points out that some white people have done some pretty shitty things in history.
India became independent in 1947. When does it stop being England's fault?
Atrocities are not limited to white people. All races have been horrible people at various points in time.
You are mistaking me for somebody else. You’ve never posted anything for me.
I misunderstood, then.Whether you read it or not, it was posted.
Whether you care about it should have nothing to do with me.
I misunderstood, then.
I thought you were saying you posted this specifically for me
Good ol’ Joe. I see you still have not read this book:Posted it for anyone who wanted to read it.
If you want to ignore it, then that's a "you" decision.
I posted facts for you.Good ol’ Joe. I see you still have not read this book:
I posted facts for you.
You can either accept them, or ignore them.
Good ol’ Joe. I see you still have not read this book: