Legit/real or not, WH tweet leaks are fantastic entertainment...
- Thread starter Joes Place
- Start date
Ruh roh...
http://bipartisanreport.com/2017/04...gainst-trump-republicans-confirm-rumor-tweet/
A GJ can indict a ham sandwich. Can a GJ indict a Cheeto?
http://bipartisanreport.com/2017/04...gainst-trump-republicans-confirm-rumor-tweet/
A GJ can indict a ham sandwich. Can a GJ indict a Cheeto?
Which aspect of that photo was less surprising...the empty seats, or the neo-nazis in the foreground?
What is truly disturbing nowadays is how the alt-right is now becoming a political 'norm'; back in the 80s/90s, that was not the case, and those are the folks that brought us the OK City Federal Building bombing.
I think it's a legitimate concern that when things turn and these people don't get their way, this will repeat - and many people don't realize that OK City was presumed to be Middle Eastern terrorism at the time. It was NOT referred to as domestic terrorism, or "Rightwing Extremist Terrorism" hardly at all. Those people think they are "Freedom Fighters", not "terrorists". And we need to call them what they are.....media is too afraid to lose ratings by doing so and FOX seems to just 'normalize' too much of the rhetoric.
Rhetoric and propaganda have consequences. May not be this month or this year, but it'll happen, and then everyone will be "shocked" at how something so horrible could occur in the US. Our risks aren't "refugee terrorism" or "ISIS terrorism"; they are far far higher for "domestic terrorism".
WTH is the point of this 'call in' center? Aside from propaganda?
Don't people report crimes to local authorities already?
You see the transcripts where they were talking about changing or removing the 1st amendment? Smdh
Looks like our NEXT President is learning from the Russians as well...
http://fox59.com/2015/01/26/gov-mike-pence-to-start-state-run-news-outlet/
http://fox59.com/2015/01/26/gov-mike-pence-to-start-state-run-news-outlet/
White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus admitted during a Sunday morning interview with ABC's Jonathan Karl that the Trump administration has "looked at" a constitutional amendment to free speech protections.
Karl sought to clarify President Trump's tweet that "the failing New York Times has disgraced the media world. Gotten me wrong for two solid years. Change the libel laws?" "That would require, as I understand it, a constitutional amendment," Karl said. "Is he really going to pursue that? Is that something he wants to pursue?"
"I think it's something we've looked at," Priebus replied in the affirmative. "How that gets executed, or whether that goes anywhere, is a different story."
Karl sought to clarify President Trump's tweet that "the failing New York Times has disgraced the media world. Gotten me wrong for two solid years. Change the libel laws?" "That would require, as I understand it, a constitutional amendment," Karl said. "Is he really going to pursue that? Is that something he wants to pursue?"
"I think it's something we've looked at," Priebus replied in the affirmative. "How that gets executed, or whether that goes anywhere, is a different story."
They'd never consider doing it; it would literally GUT rightwing radio shows.
Free Speech restrictions are a double-edged sword.
LOLWUT??!!!
"Why was there the Civil War?"
"Why cants I haves mah Slaves today!!??"
"People don't ask that question"!!!????
Holy shi-i-i-i-t, Batman!!!!
Oh, cool! A way for illegal immigrants re-caught in the US after we tossed them into Mexico without ANY of their belongings to come back and get free room and board for 5 years. Sounds like THAT'll be cheap!!!
Hmmm....th3j35t3r is unusually quiet over the past 24 hrs.
Usually means he is "busy" with something....
Usually means he is "busy" with something....
