Link To letter sent to Congress by the Thief Justice of the Supreme Court

[THE_DEVIL]

The today reaffirm and restate foundational ethics principles and practices to which they subscribe in carrying out their responsibilities as Members of the Supreme Court of the United States. This statement aims to provide new the bar and to the public on how the Justices address certain recurring issues, and also seeks to dispel some common misconceptions.

The Justices, like other federal judges , consult a wide variety of authorities to address specific ethical issues . They may turn to judicial opinions , treatises , scholarly articles , disciplinary decisions , and the historical practice of the Court and the federal judiciary . They may also seek advice from the Court's Legal Office and from their colleagues .

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-ethics-durbin/cf67ef8450ea024d/full.pdf

 

[Chishawk1425]

Expand the court to 13 as it should be. Period..And term limits on Justices.

 

[IowaPackFan]

Expand the court to 13 as it should be. Period..

Expand on this.

 

[Chishawk1425]

Expand on this.

No

 

[The Tradition]

Why not 50 justices, Chis?

 

[THE_DEVIL]

Expand on this.

expound

 

[THE_DEVIL]

Why not 50 justices, Chis?

sounds good. LFG!!!!

 

[Chishawk1425]

Why not 50 justices, Chis?

13

 

[Tom Paris]

Why not 50 justices, Chis?

I’d love it. Go to 100.

 

[tumorboy]

Why not 50 justices, Chis?

69

 

[THE_DEVIL]

Why not 50 justices, Chis?

I’d love it. Go to 100.

Probably want to have an odd number on the court😈

 

[mnole03]

They may also seek advice from…their colleagues.

I can imagine how that consultation would go,

 

[Formerly Rockymtnole]

Expand the court to 13 as it should be. Period..And term limits on Justices.

No, just be more of the same.

 

[Chishawk1425]

No, just be more of the same.

Term limits and actual ethics policies, no it would not. The current joke needs to be gutted.

 

[Formerly Rockymtnole]

Term limits and actual ethics policies, no it would not. The current joke needs to be gutted.

You want more nomination fights?

And you didn’t mention ethical standards (which I agree with), you mentioned expanding the court (which I don’t).

 

[luvmyhawks]

13

Fine. Expand to 13 and give each party 2 nominations. Seems dumb, but if it makes you feel better.

 

[Chishawk1425]

Fine. Expand to 13 and give each party 2 nominations. Seems dumb, but if it makes you feel better.

Lol, there are 13 Judicial circuits. The court expanded numerous times in the 1800s and at one time there were 9 Juducial circuits hence 9 Supreme Court Justices. This current corrupt, bought and paid for illegitimate joke isn't it.

 

[luvmyhawks]

Lol, there are 13 Judicial circuits. The court expanded numerous times in the 1800s and at one time there were 9 Juducial circuits hence 9 Supreme Court Justices. This current corrupt, bought and paid for illegitimate joke isn't it.

Great. Like I said, expand to 13 and each party gets 2 nominations. I am good with it.

 

[Chishawk1425]

Great. Like I said, expand to 13 and each party gets 2 nominations. I am good with it.

Yep. Step 1. Impeach Clarence Thomas.

 

[GOHOX69]

Chat gpt would be kazillion times better than the assclowns on the court now. All of them are biased and compromised.

 

[bhawk24bob]

We should consider establishing a higher court and calling it the More Supreme Court, leaving room for the eventual establishment of the Most Supreme Court

 

[Finance85]

Seems like the fact that all 9 justices are in agreement is being ignored. How convenient.

 

[CarolinaHawkeye]

69

That's the answer for everything.

 

[THE_DEVIL]

Seems like the fact that all 9 justices are in agreement is being ignored. How convenient.

Exactly why things need to change

 

[IowaPackFan]

expound

It’s either or in this situation.