ADVERTISEMENT

Little Debbie has now lost 4 or more games in a season 21 Years in a Row (2004-2024)

Frank Solich (Pelini coached the bowl game?) went 10-3 in 2003. That team was ranked as high as #10 in the country.


Here is a look at the 18 years since that 10-3 season in 2003:
..........................................
2004: 5-6 Bill Callahan (4 years)
2005: 8-4
2006: 9-5
2007: 5-7
..........................................
2008: 9-4 Bo Pelini (7 years)
2009: 10-4
2010: 10-4
2011: 9-4
2012: 10-4
2013: 9-4
2014: 9-4
..........................................
2015: 6-7 Mike Riley (3 years)
2016: 9-4
2017: 4-8
..........................................
2018: 4-8 Scott Frost (4 years)
2019: 5-7
2020: 3-5
2021: 3-4


little_debbie.jpg
In this column, Chatelain asks if Frost knows what he is doing.

Chatelain: Scott Frost can't seem to find medicine for Husker headaches

Happy Hanukkah. Merry Christmas. Hallelujah. Where’s the Tylenol?

Favored by 10 points on Senior Day, in a game necessary to avoid a fourth consecutive losing season, facing a team without 30-plus players, a 2-3 opponent that hadn’t played in three weeks, Nebraska lost inexplicably.

Again.

You can sift through the wreckage as much as your stomach will tolerate: the swing pass for minus-9 yards on the first snap, the minus-2 turnover margin, the missed 32-yard field goal, the 8-yard punt, the zero sacks, the 10-minute difference in time of possession, the 8-yard difference in average field position, the 3.8 yards per pass attempt, the holding penalty that wiped out a fourth-quarter touchdown.

But all of that boils down to this: Does Scott Frost know what he’s doing?

Not one of us has learned more football — certainly not from more impressive minds — than Nebraska’s coach. To suggest that Frost didn’t have the preparation to succeed in Lincoln is laughable.

But what good is knowledge if you can’t pass it on to your players? For three years, Frost’s pedigree hasn’t done him a bit of good. Your local high school coach wouldn’t do much worse than 11 wins and 20 losses at Nebraska.

Four decades of watching successful Husker football didn’t teach Nebraskans how to coach. But all those 10-win seasons did teach us to recognize good football.

Block and tackle. Take care of the ball. Limit penalties and blown plays. Take advantage of opportunities when your opponent gives you one. It’s not complicated.

Look at Iowa State this year, or Indiana, or Northwestern, or Coastal Carolina.

Nebraska doesn’t show much interest in the formula. Its quarterbacks miss critical throws to open receivers downfield. Its offensive linemen commit backbreaking penalties. Its defenders don’t create havoc. Its coach calls plays that, within a second after the snap, resemble training drills for a CPR class.

As you watched Saturday, did you notice how frequently Minnesota, which hadn’t played in 22 days, lined up and executed a basic play? Meanwhile, Nebraska, which gained 308 yards in 65 snaps, rarely found a rhythm.

Frost’s offense has two persistent, glaring flaws:

1. The inability to bust big plays. Nebraska’s vertical passing game is so atrocious at this point, Frost might as well run the wishbone.

2. The inability to string five, six, seven solid plays together. With the exception of about one drive per game, defenses merely have to wait for a Big Red breakdown.

Those two characteristics go together like gravy and Jell-o. Yet despite all its issues, Nebraska was still hanging in there Saturday, until the final drive of the third quarter.

Then disaster arrived.

First down from the NU 36: Play-action fake, Adrian Martinez missed a semi-open Austin Allen.

Second down: Martinez missed a semi-open Wan’Dale Robinson.

Third down: Sack and Martinez fumble.

Minnesota took the ball 39 yards and scored, essentially ending Husker hopes and kickstarting another postgame autopsy.

Multiple times during Frost’s press conference, he referenced how well Nebraska prepared this week. All the plays they executed in practice.

“I hate to even say this,” Frost said, “but we had our best week of practice offensively maybe since I’ve been in Nebraska.”

Multiple times, he referenced youth as a reason for game-day mistakes.

“It’s not meant to be an excuse,
but we’re still playing a lot of young guys and as they grow, they’re going to win more often than they lose,” Frost said. “You can’t call however many pass plays we called and miss five and get sacked and get beaten in protection two or three times. Those mistakes get you beat in this league.”

But relying on young guys usually means that older guys haven’t developed. That’s on the coaching staff, right?

More to the point, Frost’s offensive starters Saturday consisted of three seniors (including a left tackle making his 40th career start), four juniors (including a third-year starting quarterback), two sophomores (including Robinson, who’s certainly not part of the problem) and two freshmen. The lineup didn’t include senior Dedrick Mills, his top tailback.

In this era of college football, that’s more experience than any coach could ask for.

If, at this point in Frost’s tenure, you’re ranting and raving like Clark Griswold after opening his Christmas bonus, you have good reason. You might even have the urge to put a big ribbon on Frost’s head and call him every name in the book.

But it doesn’t solve the problem.

Frost must fix this offense before August 2021. Whether it’s recruiting a mercenary quarterback or developing his young receivers or modifying his scheme to better fit the Big Ten West or overhauling practices to ensure that Monday reps feel more like Saturday, he has to find a way. He can’t put his fans through another fall like this.

In 20 previous seasons, the Huskers lost nine times as a double-digit favorite. Nebraska did it in back-to-back home games.


Three years into the Frost era, he still can’t find the medicine for this headache.

Nice distraction. Iowa lost. Don’t use replacement insult to make us feel better.
 
The ghost of Tom Osborne still haunts the
Nebraska locker room. This legendary coach
has never been and never will be replaced.
In the meantime Nebraska wishes they never
would have joined the Big Ten Conference.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ridethed5


Little Debbie has lost 4 or more games in a season 18 years in a row.

Frank Solich (Pelini coached the bowl game?) went 10-3 in 2003. That team was ranked as high as #10 in the country.


Here is a look at the 18 years since that 10-3 season in 2003:
..........................................
2004: 5-6 Bill Callahan (4 years)
2005: 8-4
2006: 9-5
2007: 5-7
..........................................
2008: 9-4 Bo Pelini (7 years)
2009: 10-4
2010: 10-4
2011: 9-4
2012: 10-4
2013: 9-4
2014: 9-4
..........................................
2015: 6-7 Mike Riley (3 years)
2016: 9-4
2017: 4-8
..........................................
2018: 4-8 Scott Frost (4 years)
2019: 5-7
2020: 3-5
2021: 3-9
 



2008: 9-4 Bo Pelini (7 years; 66-28)
2009: 10-4
2010: 10-4
2011: 9-4
2012: 10-4
2013: 9-4
2014: 9-4
..........................................
2015: 6-7 Mike Riley (3 years; 19-19)
2016: 9-4
2017: 4-8
..........................................
2018: 4-8 Scott Frost (5 years; 15-30)
2019: 5-7
2020: 3-5
2021: 3-9
2022: 0-1
 
Nebraska pretty much has no identity and lacks mental toughness. They continually flail seeking answers (wins) and will continue to do so until they do an honest assessment and look at trying to be what they can reasonably be instead of what they were. Nebraska today can reasonably aim to be on the level of Iowa and Wisconsin, a tough, solid team that wins mainly by identifying players who fit their program and getting a few standouts here and there. The problem is the fan base thinks they are Alabama level once they get the right coach. A lot of the factors that made Nebraska what it was (option football, steroid-fueled linemen, few threats in their conference, 200 walk-ons, etc) don’t exist today. They at least had an identity.
 
Nebraska certainly sucks, yet Iowa fans seem to be just a bit obsessed with the team. 15 total threads that are directly about Nebraska, with another handful indirectly about them. For a second I thought I was on a Cornhusker board.

It's a bit surreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pawkhawk1
Nebraska certainly sucks, yet Iowa fans seem to be just a bit obsessed with the team. 15 total threads that are directly about Nebraska, with another handful indirectly about them. For a second I thought I was on a Cornhusker board.

It's a bit surreal.
1) There weren't any other Big Ten conference games this week.
2) Nebraska, with little evidence other than their close losses last year, was a trendy pick to win the West and win 10 games this year.
3) When Nebraska fired its most successful coach since Solich their AD called out Iowa as being far from the type of championship team Nebraska is expected to be competing with.
4) Iowa and Nebraska share a border.
5) Scott Frost was supposed to return Nebraska to elite status. This game was being billed as a referendum on him as coach.

I could go on, but I have no problem with lots of Nebraska threads this week. If it happens after every Iowa game then you have a point,
 
Nebby has two winnable games against indiana and rutgers but nothing certain. North Dakota could get them and the Bison certainly will be drooling over the chance to win in Lincoln. OU on paper should beat Nebby. I know squat about G Southern.

But nebby could be 1-3 in the first 4 games. On paper they lose to Iowa, Wisky, Mich, Minny. We will know if Purdue's defense is any good in a few weeks.
 
Nebby has two winnable games against indiana and rutgers but nothing certain. North Dakota could get them and the Bison certainly will be drooling over the chance to win in Lincoln. OU on paper should beat Nebby. I know squat about G Southern.

But nebby could be 1-3 in the first 4 games. On paper they lose to Iowa, Wisky, Mich, Minny. We will know if Purdue's defense is any good in a few weeks.
If they were playing North Dakota State they might be in trouble. Fortunately for them, they are playing UND, which hasn't been quite the powerhouse NDSU has been. They were 5-6 last year, but like Nebraska had a lot of close losses including a 16-10 loss to NDSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: not_mantiteo
Nebby has two winnable games against indiana and rutgers but nothing certain. North Dakota could get them and the Bison certainly will be drooling over the chance to win in Lincoln. OU on paper should beat Nebby. I know squat about G Southern.

But nebby could be 1-3 in the first 4 games. On paper they lose to Iowa, Wisky, Mich, Minny. We will know if Purdue's defense is any good in a few weeks.
Bison? Who are you talking about?

North Dakota's mascot are the "Fighting Hawks."

You thinking of North Dakota State? They are the Bison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBHawk
If they were playing North Dakota State they might be in trouble. Fortunately for them, they are playing UND, which hasn't been quite the powerhouse NDSU has been. They were 5-6 last year, but like Nebraska had a lot of close losses including a 16-10 loss to NDSU.
Oh yes, I was thinking it will be NDState.
 
Bison? Who are you talking about?

North Dakota's mascot are the "Fighting Hawks."

You thinking of North Dakota State? They are the Bison.
Oh yes, I was thinking it will be NDState when I looked at the espn schedule. Good catch, so to speak
 
Whoever is setting those percentages is obviously not very knowledgeable about football.

it's all computer program driven. If you go to a game on ESPN.com, I believe the win percentages are updated after each play. not sure how they account for (and program for) stupid coaches
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BBHawk
They don't as Nebraska games start at 50/50 so coaching is obviously not in the metric.
good (and interesting) point.

I should look at it more closely. So, Iowa and South Dakota State will start out at 50/50, where being a 15.5 point favorite and at home is not factored in, correct?
 
good (and interesting) point.

I should look at it more closely. So, Iowa and South Dakota State will start out at 50/50, where being a 15.5 point favorite and at home is not factored in, correct?

Honestly I have never looked before a football game. When I see them for baseball and I am not analyzing the metrics they always 50/50 or close to my old eyes.

Ok so I had to go look, and nope you are correct. They were still favored 78.6% at the start of the game.

Neb-NU Game Summary

That is extremely odd to me that it is that high. I mean you start with 100% chance, subtract the 20% that Frost is going to screw it up and that leaves 1.4% chance of NU of winning. So I see the breakdown as really:

Nebraska 78.6% chance of winning
Frost screwing it up 20%
NU 1.4% of winning
 
Go over to the Nebraska Rivals board and all they do is complain about the B1G and how Nebraska would be better off in another conference. This is from a fan base whose team basically has the smallest market (1.9 million state population) and hasn't won anything this century. Plus, they're the only non-AAU member in the conference. They love living in the past.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
Go over to the Nebraska Rivals board and all they do is complain about the B1G and how Nebraska would be better off in another conference. This is from a fan base whose team basically has the smallest market (1.9 million state population) and hasn't won anything this century. Plus, they're the only non-AAU member in the conference. They love living in the past.

s2yrw.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT