ADVERTISEMENT

Marjorie Taylor Greene calls for bloodshed

And they are being held to the rule of law, admittingly at a snails pace.

However, even our Founding Fathers believed in a right to revolution. How long should America go without one? Every other nation in history has either revolted, dissolved, or was conquered. Why should we be so obtuse to think this will not happen to us as well? It is not a question of if, but when and who is willing to make the first move? The answer to the latter is clear and does not bode well for the other side that wants to fight with keyboards versus rifles.
Oh please. The crowd with rifles and ammo will be summarily dispatched in a violent and swift manner. Outside of the truly crazy, most of these bloviating jackholes understand this to be true. There is no revolution looming.
 
Well Republicans control the court. Will control Congress. Most of the State Legislatures. Perhaps the grievances are aimed at the wrong people.

This is why it’s crazy talk. GOPers are enjoying a very significant advantage but yet a “revolution” is needed? Why on earth would that be the case from their perspective? Revolutions were started over far more serious concerns than cancel culture, political correctness, and boys in girl’s restrooms.

If anything Dems and anyone anti-trumpism should be talking revolution.
 
And do you think the morons lining up at school board meetings to shout at old women see it this way? Or the dumbest, most egregious way possible?
Oh, there are idiots who will misinterpret what she said and take it in the most egregious way possible. That’s why I said it was pointless inflammatory rhetoric.

I’m just pointing out that a proper interpretation of her words does not call for bloodshed. Not at this time, anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
Oh, there are idiots who will misinterpret what she said and take it in the most egregious way possible. That’s why I said it was pointless inflammatory rhetoric.

I’m just pointing out that a proper interpretation of her words does not call for bloodshed. Not at this time, anyway.
Reminds me of the first Pastor at my church as a child. Extreme fire and brimstone. The end is near everything is going Satan's way. Reckoning day is upon us.
Couple hours later he's out working on his flower garden. Guess the End isn't tomorrow :).
 
Is she referencing not being able to f- her yoga instructor while her husband looks on.....because I do believe that is illegal in Georgia.
I believe I’ve seen a movie with a similar plot. Will research.
 
Technically she’s not calling for bloodshed here. She’s calling for us to defend our freedom now because if we don’t defend our freedom and we lose it, bloodshed is the only way to get it back.

It’s still pointless inflammatory rhetoric and she’s still an idiot who has no business serving in Congress. I just wanted to note that subtle but important distinction.
I actually disagree with the first part. She spoke very specifically about needing to “restore“ America to the republic it was originally intended to be and then followed that with only getting rights back with bloodshed. @FAUlty Gator isn’t someone I always agree with, but he’s right - this is the kind of stuff we see when violence is incited and we go back to look at causes.

This shouldn’t just be ok.
 
Sitting member of Congress actively calling for bloodshed. Not just random crazy nut saying crazy things.
While Kevin McCarthy plots to be Speaker. What's he going to do with MTG, Boebert, Cawthorn, Biggs, Brooks and Gosar when he's the Speaker?
 
While Kevin McCarthy plots to be Speaker. What's he going to do with MTG, Boebert, Cawthorn, Biggs, Brooks and Gosar when he's the Speaker?
Continue to use them as the useful idiots they are. That part of the GOP is very active and votes often
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
Continue to use them as the useful idiots they are. That part of the GOP is very active and votes often
It's unclear that they will play along. MTG has her own audience, and her own fundraising machine. What does she need McCarthy for?
 
It's unclear that they will play along. MTG has her own audience, and her own fundraising machine. What does she need McCarthy for?
The Wackos always eat the moderates. When the moderates try to please the Wackos.
 
It's unclear that they will play along. MTG has her own audience, and her own fundraising machine. What does she need McCarthy for?
I meant that he won’t control them but let them continue to run around so the base stays activated.
 
McCarthy figures that step one is to be Speaker, and then the rest will sort itself out.
How long did Boehner last with the Freedom Caucus. He'll do something that ticks Trump off and be moved out.
 
Oh, there are idiots who will misinterpret what she said and take it in the most egregious way possible. That’s why I said it was pointless inflammatory rhetoric.

I’m just pointing out that a proper interpretation of her words does not call for bloodshed. Not at this time, anyway.

Bullshit. This is the 1st flaming rhetoric she's thrown out?

She's a firehose of ugly diatribe and she didn't THIS TIME!

Like the Orange Turd, we're supposed to guess when she's lying?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
Do you suppose she would give her life to restore America's freedoms?

Nope.
I'd like a list of these freedoms that need restored. CrossFit Karen talks a good game about needing a bloody revolution. But let's say we have one. What changes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk_4shur
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT