Massive Bigot Joe Biden States Kamala Harris was a DEI Hire
- Thread starter Phenomenally Frantastic
- Start date
Another ****ing amazing thread by OP.
Seems he nailed it, Old Joe picked Kamala Chameleon because of her skin tone not her brains as if she had any! LOL
If you could just admit she is a diversity hire, then we could move forward. But no, you continue to deny reality.
Why is there any anguish at all from dems on this topic? if she is dei, it proves that dei actually works and rhat dems stand 100% behind their ideals. if she isn’t dei, it still looks bad to protest the accusation coz it gives the impression that dei is poor policy— and if this is the case harris should revisit/revamp/reject it.
letting this fester is not good election strategy.
letting this fester is not good election strategy.
I have made this exact talking point. Dems say that she is qualified, therefore not a dei hire.
This argument doesn't make sense and only undermines their dei position.
to clarify what i think — i believe that harris is a self made person who has made things happen for herself (ie hasn’t been handed the reigns like some chump execs in the workplace) but she’s on the wrong side of the dei as policy argument which she perhaps milks
Black with a vagina were the only requirements. Yes DEI bullshit and has proved to be a disaster like most DEI initiatives.
This post illustrates the issue perfectly.
It assumes that, if any decision to hire/nominate/retain someone was influenced - in part - by wanting to bring the experiences of a historically disadvantaged group, then the person hired/nominated/retained is unqualified for the position or, as the poster ignorantly suggests "has no brains."
There can be no serious question that Biden's choice of Harris was influenced - in part - by gender and ethnicity. There can also be no serious question that, when Biden picked her to be his VP candidate, Harris' resume includes (a) District Attorney; (b) California Attorney General; and (c) United States Senator.
It's all about connotation. Those demanding "admission" that Harris was a "DEI hire" want that admission so that they can advance an argument that she's just a dumb black woman who couldn't accomplish anything on her own without but for preferential treatment based on gender and skin color. They are the people who decry that diversity, equity, and inclusion bring "nothing" to the table.
When, in reality, it is the close-minded people who are most offended by the concept of DEI who best exemplify why DEI is a valuable part of the decision-making process.
Cracks me up that you racist aholes are doubling down on this.
Thank you for showing us who you are.
Thank you for showing us who you are.
One party supports a felon, a fraud, a fascist, a narcissist, a traitor, and a rapist.
The other party supports a supposed DEI hire who happened to be former Senator, as well as Attorney General of California.
Which would a normal person prefer?
The other party supports a supposed DEI hire who happened to be former Senator, as well as Attorney General of California.
Which would a normal person prefer?
I want dems to admit she was a dei hire because that is a reality.
I don't think she would have been vp on merit alone. Dei has benefitted kamala quite a bit.
Our country is not better because dei was used to pick our vp and pres candidate. I would rather see a person picked because they are the best rather than because they check certain boxes.
So you don't think she is qualified? How is "best" determined in this case?
She was elected.
You are a Trump supporter. Think about that.
Oh, gimme a break. What the hell does “best” mean when selecting a VP?
Is JD Vance the “best” candidate to run with Trump? Please explain why.
I've never seen anyone love on a couch the way he does.
Why do we need 8,000 threads on this? Biden campaigned on the fact he would pick a minority woman to be VP. It wasn't a secret at the time and it certainly isn't now.
Was it stupid at the time? Yes. Is it stupid now? Yes.
Was it stupid at the time? Yes. Is it stupid now? Yes.
Last edited:
No frauds, no rapes, no felonies, no bankruptcies, no treason. Of course she's not qualified. What is the matter with you libtards?
Not sure that helps your claim like you think it is. Have you taken a look at California?
Do you mean the state with the largest gross state product in the USA? Or what do you mean?
So she was attorney general for the largest populated state in the union and world's fifth largest economy.
What state would have provide better experience for her career path?
she hasn't even hosted a reality show or appeared on WWE
Saying it was a DEI hire is only ok if you're a Dem.
Trump is a DEI hire for the GOP. Old white men are the only category that fits their DEI categories.
Last edited:
What democrat have you heard using the term "DEI hire" as a normal course of business?
It sounds like Kamala is very likely going to pick a white guy as her running mate to balance the ticket. Would that be a DEI hire, or does it only go one way?
I mean that Californian is a shit hole.
Do people proudly boast managing a failing corporation?
It is kinda awkward watching libs pitch DEI as a great and necessary thing only to complain when people are called DEI hires. If it's so great shouldn't they be proud to own it?
Quite the conundrum.
It’s fine when they proudly state Harris is DEI pick. It’s racist when anyone else says it. They are ****in’ nuts.
Simple answer cons say DEI are not qualified. They get the job based on their race or gender.
Race and gender were the two biggest considerations for Biden as it pertained to his vp pick. He said as much..
Same with his scotus pick.
They will defelct and ignore. That is the ONLY playbook they have because they don't have anyway to refute this. It is simply true. LOL!
Similar threads
