ADVERTISEMENT

Meme baby lawsuit against former Rep. Steve King set for trial in November

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,486
58,971
113
Former U.S. Rep. Steve King of Iowa will have to defend his campaign's social media memes in court after a judge agreed to let a copyright lawsuit against him proceed to trial.

King represented northwest Iowa from 2003 to 2021. He was sued in December 2020 by Lacey Griner, who holds the copyright to a photo of her son Sam as an infant clenching his fist during a beach vacation. Sam's expression of steely determination gave rise to the popular "success kid" online meme.

At issue in the lawsuit is a meme showing Sam — now superimposed over a background of the U.S. Capitol — urging King supporters to "fund our memes." It linked to a fundraising web page for King.

The image was used on King's campaign social media and through the online fundraising platform WinRed, without licensing from the Griners.

A January 2020 screenshot of former Rep. Steve King's Facebook page shows a post incorporating the Success Kid photo meme. The family of the child depicted, who hold the rights to the photo, sued King for copyright infringement, and submitted the screenshot as part of their complaint.


"Laney and Sam were both horrified to learn that Defendant has used Laney’s photograph of Sam and Sam’s likeness as campaign propaganda for King, someone whose statements and beliefs they find abhorrent," according to the complaint.

From 2020:Steve King votes 'no' on resolution affirming peaceful transfer of power following the election

House members condemned King in 2019 after the New York Times published an article quoting him saying, “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” The Kiron Republican maintains the Times misquoted him or mischaracterized his words.


In the meme case, lawyers for both the plaintiffs and King have asked the court to grant summary judgment in their favor. On Aug. 9, U.S. District Judge C.J. Williams agreed to dismiss a few of the claims against King and his campaign, but ruled the rest of the disputes between the parties should be decided by a jury. A trial date is now set for Nov. 14.


In his order, Williams wrote that copyright infringement claims against King himself should be dismissed, since the Griners did not prove that King was personally involved in creating, approving or posting the meme. But he rejected the King campaign's argument that the copyright on the photo was invalid, and ruled that invasion of privacy claims against both parties can continue.

The Griners also moved for summary judgment, arguing it is undisputed that King's campaign used their protected photo without permission. Williams, however, ruled that a reasonable jury could find that the edited version of the picture used by the campaign is no longer "substantially similar" to the original image.

 
On the surface, it seems fairly clear that King should lose. Not sure how much, as I don’t know that the damages are all that high, but he uses “our memes” in a way that implies that it’s his meme and he also used it as a way to drive funding. If he had just used the pic as part of a Twitter post, as random nothingness, there wouldn’t be much of a case.

It’s just lazy on the part of King and his staffers…..which is half of what I expect from them - dumb and lazy.
 
On the surface, it seems fairly clear that King should lose. Not sure how much, as I don’t know that the damages are all that high, but he uses “our memes” in a way that implies that it’s his meme and he also used it as a way to drive funding. If he had just used the pic as part of a Twitter post, as random nothingness, there wouldn’t be much of a case.

It’s just lazy on the part of King and his staffers…..which is half of what I expect from them - dumb and lazy.
I'd say a percentage of the amount his campaign raised over the time period the meme was used.
 
My guess is you would feel differently if your copyrighted work was being used and you weren't getting a cut. Or, you'd feel differently if Hillary Clinton used someone's meme without properly compensating them. You'd blow a gasket over that.

I think the cut is the key. I’ve used “success kid”, but I’ve used it here or on Twitter or in texts with friends. I made no money and I can’t imagine there would be any real case for use.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT