Moss said that in his next step, he's going to look for a school that can compete for a conference championship and win "at the highest level."
Does that scream Iowa to anyone here?
NONE of the teams listed are.
Moss said that in his next step, he's going to look for a school that can compete for a conference championship and win "at the highest level."
Does that scream Iowa to anyone here?
Does a guy who got benched at USC scream starting QB for a team "winning at the highest level" to anyone here?Moss said that in his next step, he's going to look for a school that can compete for a conference championship and win "at the highest level."
Does that scream Iowa to anyone here?
No but it’s a step up from USC I supposeMoss said that in his next step, he's going to look for a school that can compete for a conference championship and win "at the highest level."
Does that scream Iowa to anyone here?
Speaking of USC...Riley likely gets one more year or he's toast.No but it’s a step up from USC I suppose
Oregon has one of the highest NIL budgets at $15M to $20M. They brought in two very good QB's last year. Hard to compete with that.It has worked well for Oregon, and I know Iowa is not Oregon, but cam ward is another perfect example.
ExactlyCade part two.
I don't think a UNI level QB is what we need. Not confident someone like that would be an immediate upgrade over who we have. The staff needs to look at G5 transfer QBs before FCS.Cam Coleman from Richmond is another QB to keep an eye on.
DisagreeNONE of the teams listed are.
Sounds similar to Cade at Michigan.He's an instant upgrade over Cade. Sullivan was an upgrade over Cade. The question today is how much of an upgrade he is over Sullivan. His passer rating was pretty modest considering the significant talent advantages they had at wide receiver vs a team like Iowa.
Right. Without the obvious physical limitations.Sounds similar to Cade at Michigan.
Hmmmmm…. he will be a perfect fit for the Hawks….lolNo but not very big and not a great athlete, not a big arm.
Sounds good to me….we definitely also need a proven portal WR or two…😎In 9 games he put up 2555 yards passing on 64.4% passing, with 18tds to 9 ints, and that usc line is not great. Now his wr targets are probably much better. This was his first year as a starter.
Define “mobile”please.Iowa's starting QB next better be mobile.
Yeah. Can you imagine the conversation that would take place between Brohm and Moss should the topic of Iowa come up?That screams Louisville based on the list provided. Plus Brohm knows how to make QBs look good.
Oh so now Cali kids are awesome and needed. According to this board they are soft and awful but now lolThat would be great 🏈
So now a 3 point loss on the road is an ass kicking? Yesterday there was a Clone describing the one point loss to them as an ass kicking.Oh so now Cali kids are awesome and needed. According to this board they are soft and awful but now lol
UCLA ass kicking has already been forgotten.
As a dual threat, if Sullivan could stay healthy, I think he'd be a very good starter next year. Because he is so mobile, the O-line doesn't have to be great. A mobile QB can do wonders for the O-line as opposed to the statues Iowa has played in recent years: Petras, Hill, and McNamara. You saw how the run game opened up for KJ immediately when Sully was inserted at QB. The defense having to account for the QB is a huge advantage for the offense. And with all off-season to work on his passing, Sully could be an outstanding QB.Encouraging that they realize that the current qbs won't be enough for next year but I don't know if this would be my first choice
Apparently you missed the QB performance he put on as USC beat LSU earlier this year.Cade part two.
I was there. Iowa was totally dominated by UCLA. That Iowa only lost by three was the result of UCLA's turnovers and penalties and a gutty performance by Jackson Stratton. Ask KJ and Higgins and Sully about UCLA. It was men against boys that night, and it was embarrassing for Iowa. That's the truth. The scoreboard can lie, and it sure did in this case.So now a 3 point loss on the road is an ass kicking? Yesterday there was a Clone describing the one point loss to them as an ass kicking.
Did I miss where the term ass kicking was changed to describe a contest where the outcome is decided by 3 points or less?
The scoreboard is the only thing that matters in the end. The Iowa lines were dominated in that game, but a 3 point loss is not an ass kicking any more than a 3 point win where you were dominated yardage wise is an ass kicking.I was there. Iowa was totally dominated by UCLA. That Iowa only lost by three was the result of UCLA's turnovers and penalties and a gutty performance by Jackson Stratton. Ask KJ and Higgins and Sully about UCLA. It was men against boys that night, and it was embarrassing for Iowa. That's the truth. The scoreboard can lie, and it sure did in this case.
So remember that Lester recruited Sullivan when Lester was HC at Western Michigan. I would be very happy with a healthy Sullivan as the Iowa QB next year. The kid showed what a difference maker he can be. With off-season coaching from Lester, by next fall Sullivan could be an outstanding dual threat QB for the Hawkeyes. Look what he did to open things up for KJ this year. And his passing was an upgrade and can continue to improve. The grass is seldom greener. The McNamara experience should remind everyone of that.I trust Lester's eyes a lot more than what we've had in the recent past.
He's not going to bring in any dogs.
There is a reason that the Iowa staff is looking to the portal for a QB, and believing they have a solid QB1 in the room is not one of them.I really like what I saw with Sullivan, however, we have seen now that he does struggle with decision making. Possibly not the most accurate passer either. Now, Iowa's WRs need to develop, however, I will continue to say that watching Marco against Tennessee was awesome. The arm strength is concerning, but every day of the week I would take that upside over Stratton, and I'm not sure Sully stays healthy all year. I hope he sticks around.
I would respectfully disagree completely. You believe in mirages. I belive in reality. Again, ask the Iowa players what they think of the UCLA game. They were dominated and embarrassed, scoreboard be damned. IMHO, of course.The scoreboard is the only thing that matters in the end. The Iowa lines were dominated in that game, but a 3 point loss is not an ass kicking any more than a 3 point win where you were dominated yardage wise is an ass kicking.
Agreed, They also know they need depth after this season.There is a reason that the Iowa staff is looking to the portal for a QB, and believing they have a solid QB1 in the room is not one of them.
There are a shit ton available right now, no idea what the cost will be, but wow are there WRs available right now. None of this mentions Juco or FCS guys.If You are going to bring in Moss You will need a WR1 from the portal that can get open quickly and threaten a defense over the top because Moss is not mobile and He will get smoked being imprisoned in the pocket if the ball cannot get out on time and if the defense is not forced to keep the safeties at the 3rd level .
Michigan is going to try to bring in a one year rental. Bryce Underwood is going to play (baring injury) but I think the plan is to create packages for him to get his feet wet and let him take off in 2026. Michigan's returning QB room is horrible.There's ZERO chance he goes to Michigan. They just paid BIG $$$ for the top high school QB in the country that they flipped from LSU.
I suspect he included them to drive up the price for his services.
😆 lol....Yes, such a valid point.Does a guy who got benched at USC scream starting QB for a team "winning at the highest level" to anyone here?