It’s an apt descriptor of you. There’s nothing enlightening or intelligent about your presence here. I feel like I’m interacting with an incel.So enlightening. 🤡
It’s an apt descriptor of you. There’s nothing enlightening or intelligent about your presence here. I feel like I’m interacting with an incel.So enlightening. 🤡
It's funny how you are still passing off a false narrative. He never lied about his military career. Not ONE BIT.It's funny how lying about your military career and embelishing your accomplishment doesn't sit well with people. The left will excuse any character flaw though, regardless of how egregious it is. I'm sure "waltz" didn't know anything about the deployment he reportedly agreed to go on 6 months in advance of him dropping out.
Good for you, son. Once again a resident liberal’s main response to a subject they’re unable to assess is use insults.It’s an apt descriptor of you. There’s nothing enlightening or intelligent about your presence here. I feel like I’m interacting with an incel.
This is pure right wing propaganda garbage and like a good rube, you lap it up.Good for you, son. Once again a resident liberal’s main response to a subject they’re unable to assess is use insults.
The facts remain. Walz was visiting Hong Kong when the Tiananmen protests began, got married on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and chose to honeymoon in China…as a member of the US military. At a time when US/China relations had chilled considerably.*
Anyone as obviously intelligent as you might be able to come up with a reasonable answer as to why that doesn’t quite pass the smell test. 🤷♂️
* (via Wiki) -
Americans who had been optimistic about the emergence of democratic characteristics in response to the rapid economic growth and China were stunned and disappointed by the brutal crackdown of the pro-democratic Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.[90]
The US and other governments enacted a number of measures against China's violation of human rights. The US suspended high-level official exchanges with the PRC and weapons exports from the US to the PRC. The US also imposed a number of economic sanctions. In the summer of 1990, at the G7Houston summit, the West called for renewed political and economic reforms in mainland China, particularly in the field of human rights.[91]
The Tiananmen event disrupted the US-China trade relationship, and US investors' interest in mainland China dropped dramatically. Tourist traffic fell off sharply.[92]
Good for you, son. Once again a resident liberal’s main response to a subject they’re unable to assess is use insults.
The facts remain. Walz was visiting Hong Kong when the Tiananmen protests began, got married on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and chose to honeymoon in China…as a member of the US military. At a time when US/China relations had chilled considerably.*
Anyone as obviously intelligent as you might be able to come up with a reasonable answer as to why that doesn’t quite pass the smell test. 🤷♂️
* (via Wiki) -
Americans who had been optimistic about the emergence of democratic characteristics in response to the rapid economic growth and China were stunned and disappointed by the brutal crackdown of the pro-democratic Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.[90]
The US and other governments enacted a number of measures against China's violation of human rights. The US suspended high-level official exchanges with the PRC and weapons exports from the US to the PRC. The US also imposed a number of economic sanctions. In the summer of 1990, at the G7Houston summit, the West called for renewed political and economic reforms in mainland China, particularly in the field of human rights.[91]
The Tiananmen event disrupted the US-China trade relationship, and US investors' interest in mainland China dropped dramatically. Tourist traffic fell off sharply.[92]
The guy knows a lot about China. Another asset for the Harris administration.Good for you, son. Once again a resident liberal’s main response to a subject they’re unable to assess is use insults.
The facts remain. Walz was visiting Hong Kong when the Tiananmen protests began, got married on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and chose to honeymoon in China…as a member of the US military. At a time when US/China relations had chilled considerably.*
Anyone as obviously intelligent as you might be able to come up with a reasonable answer as to why that doesn’t quite pass the smell test. 🤷♂️
* (via Wiki) -
Americans who had been optimistic about the emergence of democratic characteristics in response to the rapid economic growth and China were stunned and disappointed by the brutal crackdown of the pro-democratic Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.[90]
The US and other governments enacted a number of measures against China's violation of human rights. The US suspended high-level official exchanges with the PRC and weapons exports from the US to the PRC. The US also imposed a number of economic sanctions. In the summer of 1990, at the G7Houston summit, the West called for renewed political and economic reforms in mainland China, particularly in the field of human rights.[91]
The Tiananmen event disrupted the US-China trade relationship, and US investors' interest in mainland China dropped dramatically. Tourist traffic fell off sharply.[92]
this is yet another thing you're supposed to be afraid ofThe guy knows a lot about China. Another asset for the Harris administration.
Not sure why, but I'll try one last time to explain it to your mongoloid ass! Dipshit #1 used "served" in reference to the time period AWOLz was actually a CSM. He did this to make it seem as though he retired at that rank and billet and is being paid as such. I highlighted "served" in the context that his probationary period as CSM ended when he couldn't hack the course--past tense. He then received his "meritorious" demotion to E8......rather than suck it up and complete the course. Tell me, Dipshit #2, when you ring the bell day 1 of SEAL training, do you get to call yourself a SEAL the rest of your life? 🤣You said the key word is SERVED. The fact is that is a non-differential word for everyone who who has retired.
You're a moron saying moronic things. Again.
You are an incredibly stupid animal! Even left tarded Snopes says you're an asshole! 🤣>It was ADMINISTRATIVE, because he did not complete all the E9 coursework before he retired.
He was in an E9 position WHEN he retired.
LOL - that's convoluded even for you. Fact is, he SERVED as a CSM and he retired as a CSM.Not sure why, but I'll try one last time to explain it to your mongoloid ass! Dipshit #1 used "served" in reference to the time period AWOLz was actually a CSM. He did this to make it seem as though he retired at that rank and billet and is being paid as such. I highlighted "served" in the context that his probationary period as CSM ended when he couldn't hack the course--past tense. He then received his "meritorious" demotion to E8......rather than suck it up and complete the course. Tell me, Dipshit #2, when you ring the bell day 1 of SEAL training, do you get to call yourself a SEAL the rest of your life? 🤣
The day he retired he was a CSM.You are an incredibly stupid animal! Even left tarded Snopes says you're an asshole! 🤣>
- Walz served as a command sergeant major, but did {not} retire at that grade because he did not complete the required training. The Guard has said, on numerous occasions, that it is accurate for Walz to state that he has served at that rank.
Unpacking the Controversy Over Tim Walz's Military Service
Walz served in the Minnesota National Guard for 24 years before leaving to run for Congress.www.snopes.com
You do realize what that says, he did not complete the additional coursework to receive retirement benefits of command sergeant major. Wow if this is what has you guys all riled up, there is no way you are going to win the election.
I never said he didn't serve as a CSM during his little probationary period until the going got too tough for his fat ass.The day he retired he was a CSM.
And you just acknowledged that he SERVED as a CSM.
You're a dumb ****.
Because you're a parasitic slob with no honor or standards......but at least you're not shy about wearing panties......I cannot imagine getting my panties in a bunch about this when the alternative is a draft dodger. It literally makes no sense. So some guy didn’t take his additional coursework to maintain a rank in retirement. If if is the worst they have I just don’t get it.
From Snopes you lying piece of shit:I never said he didn't serve as a CSM during his little probationary period until the going got too tough for his fat ass.
Gee......you better contact the NG and Snopes and set them straight, because they sure don't agree with you, Corky!
Where does it say he's a retired CSM, Corky? Do you prefer Corky, or Dipshit #2? Here's another source for you to contact and set straight >From Snopes you lying piece of shit:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/08/16/walz-national-gaurd/#:~:text=Walz served as a command sergeant major, but,because he did not complete the required training.
The Bottom Line
A minority of veterans from the 1-125th, as well as political activists, begrudge Walz for retiring in 2005 before a long deployment in Iraq, and for using the phrase "retired as" a command sergeant major. The National Guard accepted his retirement without issue at the time and has stated that he did "serve as" a command sergeant major. Despite characterizations to the contrary, Walz has never explicitly claimed to have served in combat.
Walz served honorably in the National Guard for 24 years, and served (but did not retire) at the highest rank possible for an enlisted man. As a soldier he participated in disaster-relief deployments domestically and provided security assistance at European U.S. Air Force bases during Operation Enduring Freedom.
Likewise, the Minnesota National Guard has supported Walz on this.
WSJ, NYT and Wikipedia are ‘right wing’ propaganda? 👍This is pure right wing propaganda garbage and like a good rube, you lap it up.
The day he retired he was a CSM. Even you now admit he SERVED as a CSM. He's retired and he was a CSM.Where does it say he's a retired CSM, Corky? Do you prefer Corky, or Dipshit #2? Here's another source for you to contact and set straight >
“After 24 years in the Army National Guard, Command Sergeant Major Walz retired from the 1-125th Field Artillery Battalion in 2005,” the state website says.
Walz did serve as command sergeant major, but Walz did not complete the requirements to retire with the rank of command sergeant, Augé told us in an email.
Don't get all horny when they refer to his bios as accurate because they were just scrubbed! There are dozens of clips out there of him referring to himself as a "retired CSM."
Attacks on Walz's Military Record - FactCheck.org
In introducing her pick for vice presidential running mate, Kamala Harris has prominently touted Tim Walz's 24 years of service in the Army National Guard. Now, however, GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance and the Trump campaign are attacking Walz on his military record, accusing the...www.factcheck.org
Links to their assertions that Walz did not attain the CSM ranking and is not retired.WSJ, NYT and Wikipedia are ‘right wing’ propaganda? 👍
Link to me asserting that?Links to their assertions that Walz did not attain the CSM ranking and is not retired.
Because you're a parasitic slob with no honor or standards......but at least you're not shy about wearing panties......
WSJ, NYT and Wikipedia are ‘right wing’ propaganda? 👍
Ohhhhh.... my mistake. I wasn't thinking about that bullshit, I was thinking about the other bullshit.Link to me asserting that?
I was talking about his unique relationship with the ChiComs.
Especially going on 40 years ago, long before he’d even considered political office. Just going to go on a limb and say it being the anniversary of tianamen square (sp?) is a coincidence. And if I had the opportunity to honeymoon over there I’d be tempted to.Nobody is denying he went to China. What is right wing propaganda is the idea that’s it’s some terrible thing.
On June 4, 1994, Walz married Gwen Whipple on the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Gwen told a local newspaper that Walz “wanted to have a date he’ll always remember,” the Wall Street Journal reported.Especially going on 40 years ago, long before he’d even considered political office. Just going to go on a limb and say it being the anniversary of tianamen square (sp?) is a coincidence. And if I had the opportunity to honeymoon over there I’d be tempted to.
so, what's the allegation?On June 4, 1994, Walz married Gwen Whipple on the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Gwen told a local newspaper that Walz “wanted to have a date he’ll always remember,” the Wall Street Journal reported.
Just a coincidence.
Ya got me. He’s been an Chinese plant all these years…On June 4, 1994, Walz married Gwen Whipple on the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Gwen told a local newspaper that Walz “wanted to have a date he’ll always remember,” the Wall Street Journal reported.
Just a coincidence.
No allegations. Just observations.so, what's the allegation?
that walz is a secret chinese sleeper agent? as evidenced by his anniversary date?
you'd think sleeper agents wouldn't have such an obvious tell
Ah. “Just asking questions”No allegations. Just observations.
Yet, you seem unfazed by Trump and all his Chinese "trademarks", etc.I was talking about his unique relationship with the ChiComs.
He decided to go into politics, plus had served his required 20 years. Timing appears to be all that it is. That he left several months before his unit deployed is just happenstance. But again of this is what you want to get upset about look at Trump and dodging the draft 5 times.I never said he didn't serve as a CSM during his little probationary period until the going got too tough for his fat ass.
Gee......you better contact the NG and Snopes and set them straight, because they sure don't agree with you, Corky!
He has been very clear that he loves Chinese culture, very against Chinese authoritarianism.Yet, you seem unfazed by Trump and all his Chinese "trademarks", etc.
He has been very clear that he loves Chinese culture, very against Chinese authoritarianism.
The nail in his coffin is that Walz got married in JUNE and we both know that’s the least popular month for weddings. And you can bet that every one of the couples who chose that manifestly unpopular month vetted the date to make sure it didn’t conflict with any historical event. C’mon!! Whatever that dumbass is alluding to, it’s as plain as the point on his head.Especially going on 40 years ago, long before he’d even considered political office. Just going to go on a limb and say it being the anniversary of tianamen square (sp?) is a coincidence. And if I had the opportunity to honeymoon over there I’d be tempted to.
Not trying to get anyone. I said what I thought when someone posted a fawning article about Walz’ approach to teaching his kids critical thinking skills in regard to mass government murderers.Ya got me. He’s been an Chinese plant all these years…
I’ve said Trump’s ties to the foreign government of Israel (and her various agents) are disqualifying (that and other reasons).Yet, you seem unfazed by Trump and all his Chinese "trademarks", etc.
Yep. Especially because June 4, 1994 was that super rare day of the week for a wedding…The nail in his coffin is that Walz got married in JUNE and we both know that’s the least popular month for weddings. And you can bet that every one of the couples who chose that manifestly unpopular month vetted the date to make sure it didn’t conflict with any historical event. C’mon!! Whatever that dumbass is alluding to, it’s as plain as the point on his head.
Have you thought about seeking mental assistance?Not trying to get anyone. I said what I thought when someone posted a fawning article about Walz’ approach to teaching his kids critical thinking skills in regard to mass government murderers.
It was very telling that he left out Mao, the biggest murderer of them all. Just a coincidence, right?
Don’t care, none of these clowns are worth voting for.
I’ve said Trump’s ties to the foreign government of Israel (and her various agents) are disqualifying (that and other reasons).
Try again, tool.
No. But if I ever get to the point of lashing out at someone for having a difference of opinion (what was it you called me earlier? Oh yeah. a ‘stupid fvck) then I might just do that.Have you thought about seeking mental assistance?