ADVERTISEMENT

Minnesota National Guard - Walz didn't know about Iraq deployment and was a Command Sgt Major on the day he retired.

Oh man, wait until JD finds out about how Trump's daddy bought his way out of service. I bet he fires off an angry tweet, otherwise people with a brain might think he's being a tad hypocritical...
George Jr.
Clinton.
Biden.
Trump.

Who’s being hypocritical? If you can’t admit they all pulled strings to avoid military service then there’s not much else left to say.
 
George Jr.
Clinton.
Biden.
Trump.

Who’s being hypocritical? If you can’t admit they all pulled strings to avoid military service then there’s not much else left to say.

GWB actually served though. Opting to serve in a guard unit certainly wasn’t uncommon for the time.
 
George Jr.
Clinton.
Biden.
Trump.

Who’s being hypocritical? If you can’t admit they all pulled strings to avoid military service then there’s not much else left to say.
JD is being hypocritical. How tone deaf can someone be attacking a guy who served for 24 years when not one single person w the last name of Trump has ever served. Not one.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
JD is being hypocritical. How tone deaf can someone be attacking a guy who served for 24 years when not one single person w the last name of Trump has ever served. Not one.
More partisan delusion.

Politicians are lying opportunists and scumbags.
 
Yes, Yes it is. If he says he was World Heavy Champion, by your same standard you are holding to Walz, you are saying no you are not. You are not currently holding that title. Something you would never say. But it is something you want to challenge here. Similar to your stupidity of saying Khalif has a baby penis. Saying stupid shit is right up your alley.
Read his prior post…that explains it.
 
This is a classic Republican generated "scandal", they've been doing it for 30 plus years, i can remember in the last weeks of thee 92 campaign the Bush campaign trying to make a big deal out of Bill Clinton visiting the Soviet Union when he was at Oxford.

What they're accusing Walz of is complete bullshit that's been debunked over and over (in this thread as well)). But they'll keep talking about it in the hopes that uninformed people will think smoke = fire. It's just such a completely full of shit despicable party full of full of shit despicable people. Vance is a complete POS to take the point on this nonsense.

They're going after a guy who served his country honorably for 24 years in the National Guard, but he must be destroyed. Just horrible, despicable people. This is who they are.
 
Jesse Ventura made a great point about the national guard. Its mission isn’t to be deployed in the first place. Their mission is to stay here at home. Hence its name, the National GUARD.

It’s a bullshit argument being made to begin with.

That’s completely untrue.

https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Jou... then chief of,the Reserve and National Guard.

Under the doctrine that bears his name, Gen. Creighton Abrams, then chief of staff of the Army, devised one such mechanism to maintain the vital relationship between America and its Army.

At its core, the Abrams Doctrine sought to keep society vested in its Army by filling the void left by the draft with the Reserve and National Guard.15 It placed critical supporting units and enablers—engineers, transportation, maintenance, supply, and others—in the Reserve so that combat units could not deploy en masse without them. This inextricably linked the Reserve and Active Components in a mutually dependent relationship; a relationship then Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird, and later James Schlesinger, would further refine into the Total Force Concept.16 Abrams meant the doctrine to correct President Lyndon Johnson’s contentious decision to fight the Vietnam War without mobilizing the National Guard or Reserve. Johnson refused to call up the Reserve Component in a desperate attempt to keep the affair in Southeast Asia from interfering with his Great Society efforts at home.17 Abrams wanted to correct this by making it increasingly difficult for future presidents to commit forces abroad without tapping into citizen-soldiers at home. “They’re not taking us to war again without calling up the Reserves,” he declared.18
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
It's funny how lying about your military career and embelishing your accomplishment doesn't sit well with people. The left will excuse any character flaw though, regardless of how egregious it is. I'm sure "waltz" didn't know anything about the deployment he reportedly agreed to go on 6 months in advance of him dropping out.
Tehran Terry has spoken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
This is a classic Republican generated "scandal", they've been doing it for 30 plus years, i can remember in the last weeks of thee 92 campaign the Bush campaign trying to make a big deal out of Bill Clinton visiting the Soviet Union when he was at Oxford.

What they're accusing Walz of is complete bullshit that's been debunked over and over (in this thread as well)). But they'll keep talking about it in the hopes that uninformed people will think smoke = fire. It's just such a completely full of shit despicable party full of full of shit despicable people. Vance is a complete POS to take the point on this nonsense.

They're going after a guy who served his country honorably for 24 years in the National Guard, but he must be destroyed. Just horrible, despicable people. This is who they are.
LOL
 
You’ve served in the military?
GUvSVA3XQAARjf7
 
He RETIRED as a Master Sergeant. That's a fact. His commanding officer has verified it. Here's his coin, by the way, with the wrong rank imprinted:

breeadail_coin_timwalz-640x566.jpg


Neither has Trump. Fake news.
The day he retired he was a Command Sergeant Major. Subsequently, WHILE he was retired the military downgraded him to Sergeant Major. You know how I know that? The MILITARY says it.

It has been about 10 days of this from the right and Harris /Walz keep gaining voters in the polls. That’s because most sane people do NOT give a shit about the semantics here. It is a ridiculous line of attack and it has not, and will not move the needle in the election. So I hope the GOP keeps it up. The more you focus on minor semantics from decades ago the more you show you have no vision for America’s future.
 
Master Sergeant (E8)

The guy was his REPLACEMENT on deployment. Any service guy will say the same thing regardless of his/her beliefs.
You’re delusional. Everyone has said that he walked out with CSM on his collar. You can’t find a single source that says that. My understanding is that this guy didn’t even serve with walz.
 
Not that this will make much of a difference. But the TLDR is any warning ahead of his retirement about future deployment essentially amounted to rumors and was not official. Furthermore he earned the rank of Command Sgt. Major, he just didn't finish all the coursework he needed to retain the rank in retirement.

On top of that his CO had to approve his retirement and did.


It’s unlikely that Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic nominee to the vice presidency, knew that his unit would receive mobilization orders not long after he retired in 2005, sources with the Minnesota National Guard told the Boston Herald.

Since the announcement he would join Vice President Kamala Harris atop the party ticket, Walz has come under sustained fire over his decision to retire following 24 years of service in various Guard units while his battalion was allegedly under orders to deploy or set to soon receive orders, and over his use of the Command Sergeant Major rank in campaign messaging.

However, according to information shared by multiple official sources within the MNG, Walz earned that rank and would need either the gift of prophecy or a time machine to use the deployment as an excuse to leave the service, as his May 2005 retirement date came months before the 1-125th Battalion of the 1st Brigade Combat Team learned they would mobilize and most of a year before the unit was actually deployed to Iraq for what would become a historically long, 22-month tour.

According to Lt. Col. Kristen Augé, the MNG’s State Public Affairs Officer, Walz “served from April 8, 1981, to May 16, 2005″ during which time he “held multiple positions within field artillery such as firing battery chief, operations sergeant, first sergeant, and culminated his career serving as the command sergeant major for the battalion.”

“Governor Walz served in the Minnesota National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery after transferring from the Nebraska National Guard in 1996. While serving in Minnesota, his military occupational specialties were 13B – a cannon crewmember who operates and maintains cannons and 13Z – field artillery senior sergeant. In Nebraska, he served as a 11Z – infantry senior sergeant, and a 71L – administrative specialist,” Augé said



Walz’s official May retirement date came almost two full months before the 1-125 Field Artillery found out they would likely mobilize. An official order was not issued until a month after that, about 90 days after Walz left the service, according to information provided by Lt. Col. Ryan Rossman, the MNG’s Director of Operations.

“Minnesota National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery received an alert order for mobilization to Iraq on July 14, 2005. The official Department of the Army mobilization order was received on August 14, 2005,” Rossman said.

The unit mobilized on October 12 — nearly five months after Walz left the service — and deployed in late March of the 2006 after training in Camp Shelby, Mississippi, according to Rossman. That’s a full 10 months after Walz reentered civilian life.

Any assertions that Walz’s unit was warned of a possible deployment ahead of the July 14 mobilization order is questionable, according to DoD officials, as they amount to little more than repeated and misplaced barracks rumors.

First of all, almost every unit and member of the U.S. Military is subject to potential deployment at some point in the future and trains constantly toward that inevitability. Second, the U.S. Army’s current practice of officially notifying a unit ahead of an upcoming deployment via a “Notification of Sourcing” wasn’t implemented until 2009. Back in 2005, any unofficial hint a unit might mobilize that made its way out of the Department of the Army Headquarters would be considered unofficial and subject to change pending actual mobilization orders.

Additionally, according to MNG Joint Chief of Staff Col. Scott Rohweder, in order for Walz to retire, he would have had to clear his plans through his unit commander. There is no indication Walz’s commanding officer acted to prevent or stall his request to retire.

“We value all citizens who serve in our Armed Forces. Each service member’s service journey is unique, and when they decide to leave military service, it is a personal decision. Less than 1 percent of Americans serve in our nation’s military, and an even smaller percent reach retirement eligibility. We are grateful for citizens who commit to serving, whether on their initial contract or for 20 years. When a service member reaches 20 years of service, they can submit a request to retire even if there is time remaining on their enlisted contractual agreement. Their request is reviewed and must be approved by leadership,” Rohweder told the Herald.


On top of this, Walz had apparently returned home from a mobilization and deployment — the full length of which occurred while he was entirely eligible to drop his retirement paperwork — that ended just over a year before he began the process of leaving the military.

“Governor Tim Walz mobilized with the Minnesota National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery on Aug. 3, 2003, to support Operation Enduring Freedom. The battalion supported security missions at various locations in Europe and Turkey. Governor Walz was stationed at Vicenza, Italy, during his deployment. He returned to Minnesota in April, 2004,” Augé said.

His retirement announcement also came after his years working with artillery had led to “bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus,” according to a medical retention board Walz was forced to stand before in 2002 over his injuries. Walz required ear surgery in 2005 for installation of prosthetic bones.


Further allegations Walz is misrepresenting his rank are also unfounded, according to the MNG. Walz was indeed wearing a Command Sgt. Major’s stripes on the day he officially took off his uniform for the last time, but since he was unable to complete the 750 hours of coursework required to meet the conditions of Army Regulation 600-8-19 before he retired, he can’t be paid that rank’s retirement rate.

“He retired as a master sergeant in 2005 for benefit purposes because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy,” Augé said.

All of this is at odds with assertions to the contrary, like those made by Republican Vice Presidential candidate U.S. Sen. J.D. Vance, who served four years in the U.S. Marine Corps and claims that Walz is misrepresenting his military service.

“Do not pretend to be something that you’re not,” Vance said last Wednesday. “I’d be ashamed if I was saying that I lied about my military service like you did.”
Listen up >

 

The paper trail says different.

I believe the paper trail over former co-workers with potential axes to grind or who might have political leanings.

It's hilarious to me that you guys went on and on about how we shouldn't believe woman who said that Kavanaugh raped her who came public just as he was being nominated to the SCOTUS but you will instantly believe some rando who said that Tim Walz retired to avoid deployment just as he's nominated to the Vice Presidency. Even when the Minnesota National Guard officially disputes what he's saying.

WEIRD HOW THAT WORKS
 
The paper trail says different.

I believe the paper trail over former co-workers with potential axes to grind or who might have political leanings.

It's hilarious to me that you guys went on and on about how we shouldn't believe woman who said that Kavanaugh raped her who came public just as he was being nominated to the SCOTUS but you will instantly believe some rando who said that Tim Walz retired to avoid deployment just as he's nominated to the Vice Presidency. Even when the Minnesota National Guard officially disputes what he's saying.

WEIRD HOW THAT WORKS
Yes, all these guys went to all this trouble just because they hate the fat kid!
 
Yes, all these guys went to all this trouble just because they hate the fat kid!
LOL...no they do it because, like you, they have their heads stuffed up Trump's ass. You lie more easily than you breathe...it's your defining character trait. Lying is the easiest thing in the world to you - no trouble at all.

Say hello to your little friends somewhere beyond Trump's rectum.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
LOL...no they do it because, like you, they have their heads stuffed up Trump's ass. You lie more easily than you breathe...it's your defining character trait. Lying is the easiest thing in the world to you - no trouble at all.

Say hello to your little friends somewhere beyond Trump's rectum.
Link to one lie I've told? Take your time.......
 

Explained: The Controversy Over Tim Walz's Military Service​


https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/08/16/walz-national-gaurd/
Why does he keep telling the "retired command sgt major" lie over..and over..and over??

  • Walz served as a command sergeant major, but did not retire at that grade because he did not complete the required training. The Guard has said, on numerous occasions, that it is accurate for Walz to state that he has served at that rank.
 
You’re delusional. Everyone has said that he walked out with CSM on his collar. You can’t find a single source that says that. My understanding is that this guy didn’t even serve with walz.
Well, he can clear this whole thing up by showing the world his DD-214. He should do that immediately to shut down all of us weirdos who don't understand how the military works.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT