ADVERTISEMENT

More than half of Iowa’s tested streams and lakes are ‘impaired’

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
There are at least 721 water body segments in Iowa that do not meet water quality standards for recreation, public water supplies and the protection of aquatic life, according to the state Department of Natural Resources.
The DNR has drafted its latest list of “impaired” waters that it is required to submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency every two years. The list is based on data collected by the department and numerous other entities between 2020 and 2022, and it is used to guide restrictions for stream pollution for sources such as wastewater treatment systems.
The Iowa Department of Natural Resources maintains an interactive map that shows the state’s impaired waters. (Courtesy of Iowa DNR)

The number of impaired water body segments — which can be lakes, wetlands and parts of streams — declined about 4% from the last report in 2022.
But just 24% of stream segments and 30% of lakes that were sampled were deemed healthy. Elevated bacteria concentrations were the most-cited cause of impairment.
“We’re going to see fluctuations based on the climate, how much rainfall we’re getting, what the stream levels are,” said Noah Poppelreiter, water monitoring supervisor for the DNR.


GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX



He declined to speculate about water quality trends in the state but said the department has worked to increase its monitoring in recent years.


It assessed more than 1,400 segments for the latest report, which is a little more than half of the total segments identified by the state.





The 387 segments deemed “healthy” by the DNR are mostly composed of waters that meet some quality standards but lack sufficient data to determine that all the standards are met.


Only 24 water body segments had proof they met all the standards, up from 15 in the last report two years ago.


“That’s an abysmal number,” said David Cwiertny, director of the Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination at the University of Iowa. “It shows we’ve got really severe water quality problems.”


The DNR noted 47 fish kills during the monitoring period. Animal waste, fertilizers and pesticides accounted for more than half of them. The causes of a third of the kills were unknown.


 
Season 4 Comedy GIF by Brockmire
 
Oh, look, another thread that @NorthernHawkeye in his role as Director of the Iowa Tourism Board is ignoring.
"Come to Iowa and swim and fish in water laden with carcinogens and rotting fish killed off by nitrogen dumps"!
 
I'm sure Kim and Republicans cutting funding for water monitors has helped the water quality in some way. Although I'm not sure how.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
I do wonder how much of this is due to the drought. Rivers and streams are much lower. I would guess this would make any pollution worse. And as I continue to be sad about, many of the places we used to frequent have receded far away or dried up totally.
 
Seems like the legislature needs to defund those woke Libs at the DNR. Stop them from testing and reporting and there won't be a problem.
How would we know if we're getting better like we are? Bitch about improving. Bitch about everything. I couldn't imagine being as miserable a person as you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
How would we know if we're getting better like we are? Bitch about improving. Bitch about everything. I couldn't imagine being as miserable a person as you.
Well, we'd know if the numbers improve, correct? It's interesting that when presented with data you resort to personal attacks. Iowa has poor water quality. It's a verifiable fact. It's weird to watch posters like you so wedded to your party that you'll accept elevated cancer rates just to own the Libs. Nothing in the numbers presented suggest Iowa has healthy waterways.
 
Well, we'd know if the numbers improve, correct? It's interesting that when presented with data you resort to personal attacks. Iowa has poor water quality. It's a verifiable fact. It's weird to watch posters like you so wedded to your party that you'll accept elevated cancer rates just to own the Libs. Nothing in the numbers presented suggest Iowa has healthy waterways.
Holy projection batman. You trying to say you're not wedded to your party? Lol

Can you acknowledge that it was an improvement or no?
 
How would we know if we're getting better like we are? Bitch about improving. Bitch about everything. I couldn't imagine being as miserable a person as you.

Lucas is an aggrieved miserable soul. Complains about everything in Iowa.
 
Lucas is an aggrieved miserable soul. Complains about everything in Iowa.
Like elevated cancer rates due to poor water and air quality. Things that you and @DooBi accept because your party is in bed with the polluters.
It’s weird that you complain about complaining, but never appear in a wouldja thread, or a thread about restaurants, or a what did you do this weekend thread. You only appear in the political ones where you go straight to your corner and recite talking points. How about you tell us about all the lovely fish you caught with your friends/child/spouse in an Iowa River. Oh, I’ve seen you piss and moan once or twice in a basketball / football thread, but you never post about attending a game of your beloved Hawkeyes. Weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
Holy projection batman. You trying to say you're not wedded to your party? Lol

Can you acknowledge that it was an improvement or no?
Less sh!!!y is an improvement? And, check out the testing. It’s spotty. It’s spotty because the state wants it that way.
 
There are at least 721 water body segments in Iowa that do not meet water quality standards for recreation, public water supplies and the protection of aquatic life, according to the state Department of Natural Resources.
The DNR has drafted its latest list of “impaired” waters that it is required to submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency every two years. The list is based on data collected by the department and numerous other entities between 2020 and 2022, and it is used to guide restrictions for stream pollution for sources such as wastewater treatment systems.
The Iowa Department of Natural Resources maintains an interactive map that shows the state’s impaired waters. (Courtesy of Iowa DNR)

The number of impaired water body segments — which can be lakes, wetlands and parts of streams — declined about 4% from the last report in 2022.
But just 24% of stream segments and 30% of lakes that were sampled were deemed healthy. Elevated bacteria concentrations were the most-cited cause of impairment.
“We’re going to see fluctuations based on the climate, how much rainfall we’re getting, what the stream levels are,” said Noah Poppelreiter, water monitoring supervisor for the DNR.


GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


He declined to speculate about water quality trends in the state but said the department has worked to increase its monitoring in recent years.


It assessed more than 1,400 segments for the latest report, which is a little more than half of the total segments identified by the state.





The 387 segments deemed “healthy” by the DNR are mostly composed of waters that meet some quality standards but lack sufficient data to determine that all the standards are met.


Only 24 water body segments had proof they met all the standards, up from 15 in the last report two years ago.


“That’s an abysmal number,” said David Cwiertny, director of the Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination at the University of Iowa. “It shows we’ve got really severe water quality problems.”


The DNR noted 47 fish kills during the monitoring period. Animal waste, fertilizers and pesticides accounted for more than half of them. The causes of a third of the kills were unknown.



"Impaired" is too negative a word.

These are "Special Needs" streams and lakes.
 
Like elevated cancer rates due to poor water and air quality. Things that you and @DooBi accept because your party is in bed with the polluters.
It’s weird that you complain about complaining, but never appear in a wouldja thread, or a thread about restaurants, or a what did you do this weekend thread. You only appear in the political ones where you go straight to your corner and recite talking points. How about you tell us about all the lovely fish you caught with your friends/child/spouse in an Iowa River. Oh, I’ve seen you piss and moan once or twice in a basketball / football thread, but you never post about attending a game of your beloved Hawkeyes. Weird.
You only see what you want to see.
 
Here's a link to the DNR report. Towards the bottom is a graph of the historical trends since 1998. The impaired waters has basically held steady since 2014.

I think a more accurate statement is the number of impaired waters isn't getting better, it's just not getting worse. Hurray for the status quo.

 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Op.

Can't read? They probably have classes for that somewhere.
So, no, can't find one?
It's weird that so many people accept bad water quality, bad air quality, miserable public facilities... All because their party tells them they have it good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
So, no, can't find one?
It's weird that so many people accept bad water quality, bad air quality, miserable public facilities... All because their party tells them they have it good.
Let's try it this way. The water is crappy. Do you want it to get better or not? Should we not strive for improvement? Is this your Roe vs Wade? You don't really want it to get better because then you can't bitch.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT