ADVERTISEMENT

Most racist presidents of all time?

Blah, blah, blah. You made a comment, I asked you a question about your comment, and you refused to answer it, once again, because you don't know anything and you know that the hammer is coming. Do you know why I don't ignore "yes or no" questions? It's because I keep the same beliefs, no matter what side it comes from. You're a party line hypocrite, and therefore you can't answer simple "yes or no" questions, because you first have to figure out what you've said in the past, and then you have to figure out how your party would want you to answer.

You are a joke. Someone who would rather obfuscate than argue what they believe in. You are essentially a troll, whether or not you believe it yourself. You're basically Fred. I love it, because it's so easy to just pound your ignorant ass into the ground. It's really the only reason I took you off ignore...I missed destroying your ridiculous posts. ;)
Your grip on reality is tenuous. You didn't ask a question. You made up a position and assigned it to me. I corrected you now 4 times.
 
BTW, I always love an argument about how slavery and racism are two different arguments because slavery existed elsewhere way before this American experiment. Especially when someone wants to pretend that we're past all that effects of that shit.
 
BTW, I always love an argument about how slavery and racism are two different arguments because slavery existed elsewhere way before this American experiment. Especially when one party wants to pretend that we're past all that effects of that shit.

Maybe you want to try to refute my reasoning? Or did you just want to drive-by insult like your buddy?
 
presidents%20(1).png
Those were also some of the worst drivers, too. They were also terrible about wasting electricity.
 
That was just for you, so that you wouldn't feel so bad about getting s***-hammered and allowed to exit gracefully, but you're kind of ruining it.
I see someone trying to save face. You may leave at any time, I've had my fun with you boy.
 
Insults it is I guess...and I was so hoping that someone had the intellect to try to challenge my argument.

What's your argument? That slavery is nothing new? That the market decided who the slaves were and that that's just how it went? And that race should have nothing to do with our political discourse even when it's integral to how our nation has developed? You've one fascinating mind.

Edit: Just to clarify, my use of "fascinating" is meant to be very insulting.
 
What's your argument? That slavery is nothing new? That the market decided who the slaves were and that that's just how it went? And that race should have nothing to do with our political discourse even when it's integral to how our nation has developed? You've one fascinating mind.

Well then, it should be pretty easy to refute. I await your reasoning as to why my hypothesis is so wrong.
 
Well then, it should be pretty easy to refute. I await your reasoning as to why my hypothesis is so wrong.
Why would you feel entitled to more than a post that just asserts you are wrong by common knowledge? That is the level of discourse you send up on a good day. You're going to need to prove you are worthy of more.
 
You're in a forgiving mood. I bet you were for the defense at Nuremberg too.
The point is; it's useless to try and hold people who lived centuries ago to social standards of the present-day. Jefferson was opposed to funding NASA, by the way.

In 200 years, you'll be considered prejudiced by the standards of future generations. Don't you feel guilty?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoleSoup4U
The point is; it's useless to try and hold people who lived centuries ago to social standards of the present-day. Jefferson was opposed to funding NASA, by the way.

In 200 years, you'll be considered prejudiced by the standards of future generations. Don't you feel guilty?

You should read Nole's posts in this thread before you start talking about white guilt. He's contributed nothing to this thread apart from "there have always been slaves."
 
The point is; it's useless to try and hold people who lived centuries ago to social standards of the present-day. Jefferson was opposed to funding NASA, by the way.

In 200 years, you'll be considered prejudiced by the standards of future generations. Don't you feel guilty?
I think they knew owning people was wrong. I think they just did it anyway because it was to their benefit. I also think they justified owning people based on race, hence they were racists.
 
I think they knew owning people was wrong. I think they just did it anyway because it was to their benefit. I also think they justified owning people based on race, hence they were racists.
I think you need to share your time machine.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT