Good:
A senior aide to Donald Trump will have to go to prison while he appeals his conviction for refusing to testify before Congress about his involvement in efforts to undo the results of the 2020 election.
Sign up for Fact Checker, our weekly review of what's true, false or in-between in politics.
Peter Navarro, a 74-year-old economist, “has not shown that his appeal presents substantial questions of law or fact likely to result” undoing the conviction or his four-month sentence, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Thursday.
Navarro can still ask the Supreme Court to rule in his favor, but such an intervention would be extremely unusual. He is required to report to a prison in Miami, Fla., by March 19, his attorneys said in a recent filing.
Months after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, Navarro published a book in which he described a plot to throw the election to Trump during the vote certification that day. He credited the idea to right-wing podcast host and former Trump strategist Steven K. Bannon. But when the House committee investigating Jan. 6 issued subpoenas for the two men to elaborate on those plans, they ignored them. Now both are fighting four-month prison sentences for contempt of Congress.
Bannon is “the only comparable individual,” Navarro’s attorneys noted, and “was released pending appeal.”
Follow Election 2024
Navarro, like Bannon, argued that he did not have to respond to the House committee because of Trump’s executive privilege to withhold some internal communications. But he had no documentation indicating Trump ever planned to assert that privilege to keep him from testifying, and Trump has never publicly corroborated his account. Judge Amit P. Mehta called his immunity claim “weak sauce” and did not allow him to make it at trial. Navarro argued that Mehta’s ruling can’t stand because, for example, if there’s “a former president unexpectedly suffering from disability or death,” an aide should still be able to guard White House communications.
The ‘Green Bay Sweep’: A Trump adviser’s plot to overturn the 2020 election
3:37
Trump adviser Peter Navarro published a book in which he unveiled the plan to keep Trump in office. (Video: Monica Rodman, Sarah Hashemi/The Washington Post)
But “even if executive privilege were available to” Navarro, the judges said, “it would not excuse his complete noncompliance with the subpoena” because he would still have been obligated to produce documents and testify on anything not covered by the privilege. And his other arguments would only apply if “privilege has actually been invoked in this case in some manner by the President,” they said, which “did not happen here.”
All three judges on the panel are appointees of President Obama.
Navarro spoke at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in February, saying he was “weeks away from a prison cell.” He compared himself to Trump, noting that they were both in unprecedented legal situations. “I am the first senior White House adviser ever convicted of contempt of Congress,” he said. “Trump is the first former president ever, ever to be criminally indicted.”
A divisive figure in Trump’s White House because of his abrasive personality and strident views, Navarro was one of several allies Trump leaned on in late 2020 as the outgoing president searched for ways to stay in power. Trump’s infamous tweet telling followers to come to D.C. on Jan. 6 for a “wild” protest began with a link to a document of unfounded voter fraud claims compiled by Navarro.
The plan, as Navarro described it in his book, involved dragging out the vote count with 24 hours of speeches from Republicans in swing states won by Biden. The hope was that the spectacle would put pressure on Vice President Mike Pence to reject the results from those states, kicking off a process that would end with the House deciding the election for Trump.
A senior aide to Donald Trump will have to go to prison while he appeals his conviction for refusing to testify before Congress about his involvement in efforts to undo the results of the 2020 election.
Sign up for Fact Checker, our weekly review of what's true, false or in-between in politics.
Peter Navarro, a 74-year-old economist, “has not shown that his appeal presents substantial questions of law or fact likely to result” undoing the conviction or his four-month sentence, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Thursday.
Navarro can still ask the Supreme Court to rule in his favor, but such an intervention would be extremely unusual. He is required to report to a prison in Miami, Fla., by March 19, his attorneys said in a recent filing.
Months after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, Navarro published a book in which he described a plot to throw the election to Trump during the vote certification that day. He credited the idea to right-wing podcast host and former Trump strategist Steven K. Bannon. But when the House committee investigating Jan. 6 issued subpoenas for the two men to elaborate on those plans, they ignored them. Now both are fighting four-month prison sentences for contempt of Congress.
Bannon is “the only comparable individual,” Navarro’s attorneys noted, and “was released pending appeal.”
Follow Election 2024
Navarro, like Bannon, argued that he did not have to respond to the House committee because of Trump’s executive privilege to withhold some internal communications. But he had no documentation indicating Trump ever planned to assert that privilege to keep him from testifying, and Trump has never publicly corroborated his account. Judge Amit P. Mehta called his immunity claim “weak sauce” and did not allow him to make it at trial. Navarro argued that Mehta’s ruling can’t stand because, for example, if there’s “a former president unexpectedly suffering from disability or death,” an aide should still be able to guard White House communications.
The ‘Green Bay Sweep’: A Trump adviser’s plot to overturn the 2020 election
3:37
Trump adviser Peter Navarro published a book in which he unveiled the plan to keep Trump in office. (Video: Monica Rodman, Sarah Hashemi/The Washington Post)
But “even if executive privilege were available to” Navarro, the judges said, “it would not excuse his complete noncompliance with the subpoena” because he would still have been obligated to produce documents and testify on anything not covered by the privilege. And his other arguments would only apply if “privilege has actually been invoked in this case in some manner by the President,” they said, which “did not happen here.”
All three judges on the panel are appointees of President Obama.
Navarro spoke at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in February, saying he was “weeks away from a prison cell.” He compared himself to Trump, noting that they were both in unprecedented legal situations. “I am the first senior White House adviser ever convicted of contempt of Congress,” he said. “Trump is the first former president ever, ever to be criminally indicted.”
A divisive figure in Trump’s White House because of his abrasive personality and strident views, Navarro was one of several allies Trump leaned on in late 2020 as the outgoing president searched for ways to stay in power. Trump’s infamous tweet telling followers to come to D.C. on Jan. 6 for a “wild” protest began with a link to a document of unfounded voter fraud claims compiled by Navarro.
The plan, as Navarro described it in his book, involved dragging out the vote count with 24 hours of speeches from Republicans in swing states won by Biden. The hope was that the spectacle would put pressure on Vice President Mike Pence to reject the results from those states, kicking off a process that would end with the House deciding the election for Trump.
