You’d be wrong.I think Bo was emotionally fired for losing some big games then they claimed it was for image.
You’d be wrong.I think Bo was emotionally fired for losing some big games then they claimed it was for image.
I really just expanded further on the line play so you caught the gist of my post.
But yeah, from my limited knowledge about NU football history, the wishbone offense and dominating line play was trademark Nebraska football.
And I'm not saying they can't have good lines again, I'm just saying that they need to ditch the "Big 12 run and gun and score 45 points while giving up 44" philosophy and make line play a greater priority again.
Hold up with that. So why, does Harbough not have better QB's? They always rank high on the recruiting sites, and He's supposed to be a QB guru, yet its probably the worst position on their roster. Certainly at this point he's responsible for the poor QB play,NO?Not worried about Michigan, they lost like their entire defense, and Harbaugh still hasn't had much solid QB talent to work with.
Nebraska has no identity. They are a pseudo-pro style team who is recruiting for a spread offense, and the same could really be said about the defense, which is actually the larger of Nebraska's problems. Diaco is weird as hell and likes making excuses, but accurately pointed out that there are probably few P5 teams as consistently bad at tackling as Nebraska
Well Rudock did well in his one year there. Speight did fine (or at least well enough to have Michigan undefeated and in the top 5 until the Iowa game) in the second year until the Iowa game where he got hurt and has been hurt off and on since. Three years total isn't that much time in general anyways.Hold up with that. So why, does Harbough not have better QB's? They always rank high on the recruiting sites, and He's supposed to be a QB guru, yet its probably the worst position on their roster. Certainly at this point he's responsible for the poor QB play,NO?
Cmon, how much better was Jake at Michigan then Iowa? Surrounded by better talent at Michigan and was pretty much the same guy. Speight was not very good, and the guy he beat out is terrible. Honestly Iowa has had a better group of QB's then Michigan the last five or six years, IMHO. I just laugh at how gods gift to coaching gets a pass. You say he's had no solid QB's to work with and then try to say they've been pretty good. Which is it. I don't think their very good, and just wonder why he's not responsible for that. Yes he's only been there three years, but in that time Iowa has brought in Stanley, and Mansel, and I think we can win with either. Surely given his UNEARNED status as one of the top coaches, he can bring in better talent then Iowa, and have them ready to play within a year or two?Well Rudock did well in his one year there. Speight did fine (or at least well enough to have Michigan undefeated and in the top 5 until the Iowa game) in the second year until the Iowa game where he got hurt and has been hurt off and on since. Three years total isn't that much time in general anyways.
I'm open to the possibility of being wrong, but based on his track record, there's no reason to believe that Jim won't right the ship as far as QB play is concerned
Preaching to the choir and I've said the same thing over and over. Be physical on the lines first and foremost. Run the ball and stop the run....it's how you win in this part of the country and in the Big Ten.
Nebraska basically invented this style of football, and it's what Wisconsin and Iowa do today. Yet some way somehow Nebraska has completely forgotten how to do it.
Expectations aren't what many on here believe they are: national championship or bust. Be in contention to win your division every year and just be a competitive team. That's it. Do that and everything else will fall into place (chance at a conference title, and in a magical season........a playoff berth)
Well, and don't challenge your bosses to fire you. I mean, people like to give Nebraska crap for firing Bo Pelini after winning 9 games (including me), but people forget that he spent the previous three weeks challenging the authority of his administration. He basically dared them to fire him, and he did it publicly. I mean, most people need to be fired on that principle alone. Nebraska's mistake was saying this was "based on where Iowa was as a program" and not saying, "You can not publicly challenge the authority of your bosses with no consequences."
Don't you think that coaching in highest stage in football at the super bowl while having Colin freaking Kaepernick put up MVP numbers qualifies you as one of the top coaches? Yeah looks like I contradicted myself analyzing the QB's, but that wasn't even the point. The point I was trying to make is that Michigan will be fine. Harbaugh has been there three years and gone 10-3 in the last two. He really took over a 5-7 team and finished 10-3 the next year in his first year. I don't even like the guy, but it's impossible to deny the success he's had coaching both college and NFL. Give Michigan a couple more years and they will begin a consistent run for top 3 in the EastCmon, how much better was Jake at Michigan then Iowa? Surrounded by better talent at Michigan and was pretty much the same guy. Speight was not very good, and the guy he beat out is terrible. Honestly Iowa has had a better group of QB's then Michigan the last five or six years, IMHO. I just laugh at how gods gift to coaching gets a pass. You say he's had no solid QB's to work with and then try to say they've been pretty good. Which is it. I don't think their very good, and just wonder why he's not responsible for that. Yes he's only been there three years, but in that time Iowa has brought in Stanley, and Mansel, and I think we can win with either. Surely given his UNEARNED status as one of the top coaches, he can bring in better talent then Iowa, and have them ready to play within a year or two?
I agree with you on the line play being important. However, when Nebraska was steamrolling teams in the 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s they had among the best offensive and defensive lines in college football.
That went downhill quick after Osborne and Solich. It’s not a Big Ten vs Big 12 thing as their line play went downhill 10+ years before leaving the Big 12. But the line play of the Huskers was the key to their success over their dominant stretch.
Thats certainly possible. I don't think Michigan will fall into the abyss, and I'm not saying Harbough is a bad coach. Just asking, is THAT what he was brought to Michigan to accomplish? In year 4 through 6 to make a run to be in the top three in the east? Really? Just using your thoughts, but I agree, because thats where they find themselves, and I don't think thats going to keep him the coach at Michigan long term.Don't you think that coaching in highest stage in football at the super bowl while having Colin freaking Kaepernick put up MVP numbers qualifies you as one of the top coaches? Yeah looks like I contradicted myself analyzing the QB's, but that wasn't even the point. The point I was trying to make is that Michigan will be fine. Harbaugh has been there three years and gone 10-3 in the last two. He really took over a 5-7 team and finished 10-3 the next year in his first year. I don't even like the guy, but it's impossible to deny the success he's had coaching both college and NFL. Give Michigan a couple more years and they will begin a consistent run for top 3 in the East
Let me guess because you were good in the 90's you expect to be good now? Minnesota was a power in the 60's.
In the heyday of Nebraska, they ran the Veer Offence. Just about every High School team in the Nebraska, and half of them in Iowa, MN and the Dakotas did too. So did teams in OK, TX, KS and MO. This gave Nebraska a huge recruiting advantage, as they basically had a big feeder program. Additionally, they were not competing with Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame an others for the Pro Set or Power I quarterbacks. All you really needed was QB that could run the pitch option well, and could throw ten to fifteen yards down the field and you were fine.Preaching to the choir and I've said the same thing over and over. Be physical on the lines first and foremost. Run the ball and stop the run....it's how you win in this part of the country and in the Big Ten.
Nebraska basically invented this style of football, and it's what Wisconsin and Iowa do today. Yet some way somehow Nebraska has completely forgotten how to do it.
Expectations aren't what many on here believe they are: national championship or bust. Be in contention to win your division every year and just be a competitive team. That's it. Do that and everything else will fall into place (chance at a conference title, and in a magical season........a playoff berth)
In the heyday of Nebraska, they ran the Veer Offence. Just about every High School team in the Nebraska, and half of them in Iowa, MN and the Dakotas did too. So did teams in OK, TX, KS and MO. This gave Nebraska a huge recruiting advantage, as they basically had a big feeder program. Additionally, they were not competing with Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame an others for the Pro Set or Power I quarterbacks. All you really needed was QB that could run the pitch option well, and could throw ten to fifteen yards down the field and you were fine.
They no longer have that advantage.
Nebraska never ran the Veer offense. It was Power I and they ran the option off it.We didn't get a true option QB until Turner Gill arrived in 1981...
Dave Humm, Steve Runty, Vince Ferragamo, Tom Sorley were all mostly passing QB's.
Why on earth would God forbid that?Your biggest problem right now is that you have created a revolving door with your coaching staff. God forbid this next coach fails.
Husker fans, feel free to chime in:
Nebraska's problem (And one reason I expect Iowa, Wisconsin, etc. to continue to have success over them) is that they evidently don't understand the value of having quality line play in the Big 10. And no, I'm not saying their coaches are idiots and believe that line play isn't important (even though that's basically what I said, I get it).
My point is that this isn't the Big 12 or ACC where you can get a bunch of 4/5* receivers, running backs, QB's, and DB's and expect them to win you games. Beating teams like Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and even Minnesota involves winning the battle at the line of scrimmage. And that's why I worry for them (not actually, I like Nebraska tears) if they bring in a coach like Leach, who has only coached in the Big 12 and ACC. The air raid style offense won't work in the Big Ten, and you need to play defense, while winning the battle at the line of scrimmage.
It was interesting during the broadcast today when the announcer said that Iowa was like 20 something and 1 when they ran for over 100 yards in a game (I probably misheard that stat, so correct me if I'm wrong) as it further supports my belief. Look at Iowa's losses this year. We lost the LOS battle to Michigan State, got manhandled by Wisconsin, I'd argue we lost it to Purdue given we got nothing going on the ground (except for Stanley, who spent far too much of the game on the ground). I didn't get to watch much of the NW game, although I know they held us rushing, and we should arguably have beaten Penn State, so I'm selectively choosing to ignore that game.
So over all, it'll be interesting to see what NU does in their coaching search. If I'm the AD, I'm looking for coaches who either coached or played in the NFL, Big Ten, or SEC, and staying away from coaches like Leach or even (yes, I'm saying it), Scott Frost.
Lmao. Thanks for chiming inYou're an idiot (yes, I'm saying it).
There is some semantics to it, which is why I haven't made much of an argument about it.That's a pretty narrow definition of "mandhandling". Iowa was pushing them around up front for nearly the entire second half. Looked like a "manhandling" to me.
I suppose you can blame the poor line play on missed assignments, poor execution, etc., but handling assignments and executing are integral parts of good line play. Most of Iowa's O-line problems this year had to do with missed assignments and poor execution, but I'm not going to pretend that Wisconsin and even Purdue didn't control the LOS against us.
At the end of the day, it's mostly semantics. Iowa beat the tar out of NE on the LOS for pretty much the whole second half. Call it what you will.
Yep, gotta agree with this as I personally know quite a few Nebraska fans (some are relatives) and they absolutely expect to return to national prominence, i.e, top 10 rankings. LOL...it ain't happening.I worked in neb for over 40 years. The tired 5 natty argument came up every time they got beaten. They absolutely thought they were going to dominate the Big when they joined, EXPECTED conference titles and being in the national title conversation... still do. The internet loudmouths are NOT the minority. That's why every coach since Tom have not been good enough, and why 9 win coaches get fired there.
Steroids
No academics
No roster limits
No rules
That’s how they did it. They are done.
When Nebraska came into the B1G they underestimated the size and toughness of Big 10 defenses. Linebacker play is much more physical in the B1G. They should have given Pelini an ultimatum to improve his behavior to continue as head coach rather than just fire him. Pelini was a very good defensive coach. This year ultimately by the Iowa game it looked like the Huskers had been beaten into submission. I believe The Big 10 schedule takes more of a physical toll on players and teams than the Big 12 and player injuries come into play more as a result. Even when Nubbie was high on the totem poll they were facing less physical and lesser opponents in the Big 12 North which allowed them to have a better record and less physically beat up. Anyway I like nothing better than to see Iowa just pound those Huskers. There were neighbors lighting M80's and firing shotguns in the air here in Omaha when Iowa scored. 1 of the best wins ever! I think a couple must have run out of Ammo.Pelini should have been fired the year before he actually was (one of the many head-scratching moves of Shawn Eichorst). Pelini won a lot of games, but got embarrassed in the games that mattered and didn't bother to recruit worth a crap. Then his attitude was the tipping point. Bo didn't really leave any choice but to fire him.
Yep, gotta agree with this as I personally know quite a few Nebraska fans (some are relatives) and they absolutely expect to return to national prominence, i.e, top 10 rankings. LOL...it ain't happening.
Here's something to ponder. When UCF played Maryland this year, due to hurricane Irma, they hadn't played a game in 3 weeks and didn't practice all of the practices available to them during that time. They had only played one game this season so far. So I could imagine their team being at least a little rusty.
Well, they beat Maryland by a larger margin than Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern did, and had only played 1 game when Maryland had already played 2 games. *Both Ohio State and Penn State beat Maryland by a larger margin than UCF.
Before you start talking about Maryland losing all of their QBs in that game, their 2nd string QB, Kasem Hill started, and was injured sometime in the 1st quarter. Their 3rd string QB, Max Bortenschlager, finished the game and started the rest of the year. Which means UCF actually played a quarter against Maryland's 2nd string QB before their 3rd stringer came in. All of the B1G teams I mentioned went up against Maryland's 3rd stringer from the start of the game.
This tells us that at least by score, that Maryland gave Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern a more difficult game than they gave UCF. Keep in mind this was at the very start of Frost's 2nd year.
So...14 games into Frosts tenure at UCF, Maryland had a more difficult game against UCF than against a 3rd year Jim Harbsugh coached Michigan team...a 3rd year Paul Chryst coached Wisconsin team...an 11th year Mark Dantonio coached Michigan State team...and a 12th year Pat Fitzgerald coached Northwestern team.
I think you guys get the point. It looks like Nebraska will be a substantially better team coached by Frost than certainly Riley and Callahan, and more than likely better than Pelini's teams as well. And what was Pelini's record against Iowa again?
Looking forward to some very competitive games in the future.
Nebby's dominating line play went away about the same time as testing for steroids started.....coincidence?
Time will tell but for another year. 56-14.
If you think steroids aren't rampant at nearly every college right now, you haven't been paying attention. Steroid testing is almost non-existent in college. If they do test they notify the players well in advance. When's the last time you saw someone get suspended for steroids in college?
Enjoy it. Things are going to get fun again.
Enjoy it. Things are going to get fun again.
Okay but the same team just gave up 500 yards passing and won by three to USF. I'm not saying you're wrong, but it was one gameHere's something to ponder. When UCF played Maryland this year, due to hurricane Irma, they hadn't played a game in 3 weeks and didn't practice all of the practices available to them during that time. They had only played one game this season so far. So I could imagine their team being at least a little rusty.
Well, they beat Maryland by a larger margin than Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern did, and had only played 1 game when Maryland had already played 2 games. *Both Ohio State and Penn State beat Maryland by a larger margin than UCF.
Before you start talking about Maryland losing all of their QBs in that game, their 2nd string QB, Kasem Hill started, and was injured sometime in the 1st quarter. Their 3rd string QB, Max Bortenschlager, finished the game and started the rest of the year. Which means UCF actually played a quarter against Maryland's 2nd string QB before their 3rd stringer came in. All of the B1G teams I mentioned went up against Maryland's 3rd stringer from the start of the game.
This tells us that at least by score, that Maryland gave Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern a more difficult game than they gave UCF. Keep in mind this was at the very start of Frost's 2nd year.
So...14 games into Frosts tenure at UCF, Maryland had a more difficult game against UCF than against a 3rd year Jim Harbsugh coached Michigan team...a 3rd year Paul Chryst coached Wisconsin team...an 11th year Mark Dantonio coached Michigan State team...and a 12th year Pat Fitzgerald coached Northwestern team.
I think you guys get the point. It looks like Nebraska will be a substantially better team coached by Frost than certainly Riley and Callahan, and more than likely better than Pelini's teams as well. And what was Pelini's record against Iowa again?
Looking forward to some very competitive games in the future.
You do know there’s a reason why he’s called Scott Flop right? Please hire him! Hawkeye Nation’s begging you.Here's something to ponder. When UCF played Maryland this year, due to hurricane Irma, they hadn't played a game in 3 weeks and didn't practice all of the practices available to them during that time. They had only played one game this season so far. So I could imagine their team being at least a little rusty.
Well, they beat Maryland by a larger margin than Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern did, and had only played 1 game when Maryland had already played 2 games. *Both Ohio State and Penn State beat Maryland by a larger margin than UCF.
Before you start talking about Maryland losing all of their QBs in that game, their 2nd string QB, Kasem Hill started, and was injured sometime in the 1st quarter. Their 3rd string QB, Max Bortenschlager, finished the game and started the rest of the year. Which means UCF actually played a quarter against Maryland's 2nd string QB before their 3rd stringer came in. All of the B1G teams I mentioned went up against Maryland's 3rd stringer from the start of the game.
This tells us that at least by score, that Maryland gave Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern a more difficult game than they gave UCF. Keep in mind this was at the very start of Frost's 2nd year.
So...14 games into Frosts tenure at UCF, Maryland had a more difficult game against UCF than against a 3rd year Jim Harbsugh coached Michigan team...a 3rd year Paul Chryst coached Wisconsin team...an 11th year Mark Dantonio coached Michigan State team...and a 12th year Pat Fitzgerald coached Northwestern team.
I think you guys get the point. It looks like Nebraska will be a substantially better team coached by Frost than certainly Riley and Callahan, and more than likely better than Pelini's teams as well. And what was Pelini's record against Iowa again?
Looking forward to some very competitive games in the future.
Skill player recruiting is the one thing Riley had done well.Nebraska also had better athletes back then. They had a California pipeline and would pluck great skilled players each year from that state. Looks like that pipeline has dried up and they dont get those players anymore.
It's not just Iowa. South Dakota, South Dakota State, and North Dakota State have set up shop in Omaha and have gotten plenty of recruits out of there. Yeah, it's FCS, you can say that, but home grown D1 recruits need to be kept in program and developed into those 5th year seniors that play a big part in the program. The FCS schools encroaching on Nebraska territory is just as harmful as Iowa pulling guys out of there.I think that Nebraska has to reevaluate their recruiting philosophy. Iowa has recently recruited Cole Fisher, Drew Ott, Nathan Bazata, and Noah Fant from within their border. All of those guys were worthy of a Nebraska offer, and some of them got late offers after Iowa was already established as the favorite.
But I hear a lot of husker hand-wringing about the small number of D1 players that their state produces. That may be true, but if you aren't identifying and locking up the local talent that exists within the state, you are compounding the problem.
Nebraska needs the guys that bleed red, not only for play on the field, but also for the off season strength and conditioning work. Nebraska needs to be more aggressive with in state scholarship offers or Iowa will continue to steal those guys. I suspect that Nebraska will figure this out with its next coach, but I hope not.
Well, and don't challenge your bosses to fire you. I mean, people like to give Nebraska crap for firing Bo Pelini after winning 9 games (including me), but people forget that he spent the previous three weeks challenging the authority of his administration. He basically dared them to fire him, and he did it publicly. I mean, most people need to be fired on that principle alone. Nebraska's mistake was saying this was "based on where Iowa was as a program" and not saying, "You can not publicly challenge the authority of your bosses with no consequences."
Iowa fan cannot see past their husker hate and jealousy to understand that most husker fans want a team the contends for B1G West often and get to the B1G every 5 years or so. You cannot have 2 losing seasons out of three simple as that, there were not even glimpses that it was working. A lot of us hoped it would work. Iowa fan that said mediocre mike wouldn’t work were right, but in typical Iowa fan fashion, Iowa fan is now claiming husker fan expectations are unreal. I’m not surprised to hear it from Iowa fan, but wish they could see their idiocy.
Enjoy it. Things are going to get fun again.