You are all liars about this being "the norm" for most of the US.we are all wrong and liars
Hardly ANY of you were directly impacted by any lockdown. NONE of you were, unless you lived in those states where the outbreaks first hit.
You are all liars about this being "the norm" for most of the US.we are all wrong and liars
Yup you're a liar...You are all liars about this being "the norm" for most of the US.
Hardly ANY of you were directly impacted by any lockdown. NONE of you were, unless you lived in those states where the outbreaks first hit.
You are all liars about this being "the norm" for most of the US.
Hardly ANY of you were directly impacted by any lockdown. NONE of you were, unless you lived in those states where the outbreaks first hit.
Well yeah they were right, what do you expect? What's truly amazing is that there are still human beings that are still dumb enough to fall for this stuff.Amazing that the antivaxxers are still at it.
Unintentionally funny post. Well done.Well yeah they were right, what do you expect? What's truly amazing is that there are still human beings that are still dumb enough to fall for this stuff.
Not lockdowns.Coronavirus closures: Map of where US states are tightening restrictions
Throughout the pandemic, officials across the United States have rolled out a patchwork of restrictions on social distancing, masking and other aspects of public life. The orders vary by state, county and even city. At the height of restrictions in late March and early April 2020, more than 310...www.usatoday.com
Run the Search function on your link.Coronavirus closures: Map of where US states are tightening restrictions
Throughout the pandemic, officials across the United States have rolled out a patchwork of restrictions on social distancing, masking and other aspects of public life. The orders vary by state, county and even city. At the height of restrictions in late March and early April 2020, more than 310...www.usatoday.com
Liars gonna lie.It never happened for the very large majority of us.
Did some localities call for them?
Yep; looks like a couple, in the first weeks when the virus was running rampant, their hospitals were full, and people were dying by the thousands.
And we had full-on exponential growth of infections and deaths in those first weeks; beginning in March and thru the end of that month. Had those areas NOT acted quickly, those numbers & projections would have continued well into April and May.
Instead, we "bent the curve", which was what those minimal "lockdowns" and shutting down concerts/sports venues, etc were intended to do. The other option was to "let things rip" and have hundreds of thousands of deaths within the first few months. We PREVENTED that.
I'll grant you that, but the shelter in place directives had much of the same economic effects as a lockdown.Run the Search function on your link.
Not ONE instance of "lockdown" in it, aside from ONE quote claiming they would NOT implement any lockdowns.
You did lie though 😁Run the Search function on your link.
Not ONE instance of "lockdown" in it, aside from ONE quote claiming they would NOT implement any lockdowns.
No, it's really very clear that the people who still believe in masks and vaccines and who still defend all the idiot measures that were taken in the name of safety are the dummies.Unintentionally funny post. Well done.
Anyone who doesn’t believe in vaccines is too dumb to insult.No, it's really very clear that the people who still believe in masks and vaccines and who still defend all the idiot measures that were taken in the name of safety are the dummies.
shelter in place directives had much of the same economic effects as a lockdown.
And you continue to do so when it comes to vaccine safety and effectivenessLiars gonna lie.
Why doesn't your dumb ass scroll down and tell that to these people.Anyone who doesn’t believe in vaccines is too dumb to insult.
I’m sure you and Jenny McCarthy are on the cutting edge of this!Why doesn't your dumb ass scroll down and tell that to these people.
Robert Kennedy Jr's buddies are morons on vaccine safety, and have zero credibility.Why doesn't your dumb ass scroll down and tell that to these people.
Vaccine injury denier^.I’m sure you and Jenny McCarthy are on the cutting edge of this!
And anyone who's had just about every vaccine out there BUT the covid experiments is some how antivax now? That's how I know it's ALL bull shit.Anyone who doesn’t believe in vaccines is too dumb to insult.
And you're posting 2022 misinformation with your '7-fold' propaganda, you babbling🤡.WTF you babbling about now?
You're posting 2021 information.
I posting reviewed meta-analysisAnd you're posting 2022 misinformation with your '7-fold' propaganda
You're posting from 2021 data, CletusAnd you're posting 2022 misinformation with your '7-fold' propaganda, you babbling🤡.
"Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events."
Who has stated the vaccines do not cause these side effects? I've posted it for you a dozen times."Compared to those who did not receive COVID-19 vaccine, those who received either the first or second dose had a significantly increased risk of myocarditis or pericarditis. In addition, those who received the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis/pericarditis compared with those who received only the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine."
some studies have shown that the incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis resulting from vaccination is much lower than that in people infected with COVID-19."
(Via psu.edu, who sponsored Joe's infamous "SEVEN TIMES!!!" talking point):
The Penn State team conducted the largest study to date on the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of having the coronavirus vs. experiencing inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers compared patients with COVID-19 — vaccinated and unvaccinated — to those without the virus. They found the risk of myocarditis was 15 times higher in COVID-19 patients
rates of myocarditis in people who were vaccinated against COVID-19 were twofold higher than in unvaccinated people.
(Via psu.edu, who sponsored Joe's infamous "SEVEN TIMES!!!" talking point):
The Penn State team conducted the largest study to date on the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of having the coronavirus vs. experiencing inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers compared patients with COVID-19 — vaccinated and unvaccinated — to those without the virus. They found the risk of myocarditis was 15 times higher in COVID-19 patients, regardless of vaccination status, compared to individuals who did not contract the virus. (Bad science here: vaxxed and unvaxxed subjects MUST be evaluated separately due to the possibility of ADE, a very real threat that Offit, Fauci, Hotez et al warned about in 2020).
Next, the researchers separately compared the rates of myocarditis in those who received the vaccines to those in unvaccinated individuals. According to the findings, the rates of myocarditis in people who were vaccinated against COVID-19 were twofold higher than in unvaccinated people. (Remember Joe; your study...not mine). 😁🤡
Independent?Independent study: FOUND THE SAME RESULT
7x HIGHER RISK FROM COVID, THAN FROM VACCINES
Cardiac Complications After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination - PCORnet, United States, January 2021-January 2022 - PubMed
Cardiac complications, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis, have been associated with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection (1-3) and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (2-5). Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) is a rare but serious complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection with...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Independent?
Study author's financial conflicts of interests would preclude 'independence'. Something a man of science would seemingly grasp and accept.Yep.
And the first link was a summary of 22 INDEPENDENT publications.
I realize those are big words for you to understand here.
Study author's financial conflicts of interests would preclude 'independence'
Oh there are. To come up with the type of "conclusion" you're saying they're coming to, there most certainly are.Weird that there aren't any.
Only in Joe's brain when a study's author reports "...receiving consulting fees from (insert favorite Pharma group here)..." is it not literally huge conflict of interest.Oh there are. To come up with the type of "conclusion" you're saying they're coming to, there most certainly are.
Oh there are.
Only in Joe's brain when a study's author reports "...receiving consulting fees from (insert favorite Pharma group here)