ADVERTISEMENT

No, we're not going to forget

You are all liars about this being "the norm" for most of the US.

Hardly ANY of you were directly impacted by any lockdown. NONE of you were, unless you lived in those states where the outbreaks first hit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pinehawk
Run the Search function on your link.

Not ONE instance of "lockdown" in it, aside from ONE quote claiming they would NOT implement any lockdowns.
 
It never happened for the very large majority of us.

Did some localities call for them?
Yep; looks like a couple, in the first weeks when the virus was running rampant, their hospitals were full, and people were dying by the thousands.

And we had full-on exponential growth of infections and deaths in those first weeks; beginning in March and thru the end of that month. Had those areas NOT acted quickly, those numbers & projections would have continued well into April and May.

Instead, we "bent the curve", which was what those minimal "lockdowns" and shutting down concerts/sports venues, etc were intended to do. The other option was to "let things rip" and have hundreds of thousands of deaths within the first few months. We PREVENTED that.
Liars gonna lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
shelter in place directives had much of the same economic effects as a lockdown.

Shutting down sporting events and concerts had a massive economic effect; no one argues that point. But worldwide supply chains didn't break down because of "lockdowns"; they broke down because people didn't want to go to work and infect themselves and their relatives.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Pinehawk
WTF you babbling about now?
You're posting 2021 information.
And you're posting 2022 misinformation with your '7-fold' propaganda, you babbling🤡.

The CDC/FDA had seen enough red flags by the time EUA's were granted to Pfizer & Friends to justify pulling the plugs on the covid vaccines. They didn't. It's always been about the money. It's criminal profiteering and a lot of people have been injured and killed as a result.

"We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection."

"Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events."
 
And you're posting 2022 misinformation with your '7-fold' propaganda
I posting reviewed meta-analysis

We identified 22 eligible studies consisting of 55.5 million vaccinated cohorts and 2.5 million in the infection cohort.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467278/
 
And you're posting 2022 misinformation with your '7-fold' propaganda, you babbling🤡.


"Here we demonstrated for the first time, that in isolated cardiomyocytes, both mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 induce specific dysfunctions that correlate pathophysiologically to cardiomyopathy. Both RyR2 impairment and sustained PKA activation may significantly increase the risk of acute cardiac events."
You're posting from 2021 data, Cletus

ONE STUDY

My link reviewed 22 studies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
"Compared to those who did not receive COVID-19 vaccine, those who received either the first or second dose had a significantly increased risk of myocarditis or pericarditis. In addition, those who received the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis/pericarditis compared with those who received only the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine."

"In addition, some studies have shown that the incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis resulting from vaccination is much lower than that in people infected with COVID-19."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510095/
 
"Compared to those who did not receive COVID-19 vaccine, those who received either the first or second dose had a significantly increased risk of myocarditis or pericarditis. In addition, those who received the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis/pericarditis compared with those who received only the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine."
Who has stated the vaccines do not cause these side effects? I've posted it for you a dozen times.

The latest meta-analysis shows the VIRUS causes those conditions at a 7x higher rate
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pinehawk
(Via psu.edu, who sponsored Joe's infamous "SEVEN TIMES!!!" talking point):

The Penn State team conducted the largest study to date on the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of having the coronavirus vs. experiencing inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers compared patients with COVID-19 — vaccinated and unvaccinated — to those without the virus. They found the risk of myocarditis was 15 times higher in COVID-19 patients, regardless of vaccination status, compared to individuals who did not contract the virus. (Bad science here: vaxxed and unvaxxed subjects MUST be evaluated separately due to the possibility of ADE, a very real threat that Offit, Fauci, Hotez et al warned about in 2020).


Next, the researchers separately compared the rates of myocarditis in those who received the vaccines to those in unvaccinated individuals. According to the findings, the rates of myocarditis in people who were vaccinated against COVID-19
were twofold higher than in unvaccinated people. (Remember Joe; your study...not mine). 😁🤡
 
(Via psu.edu, who sponsored Joe's infamous "SEVEN TIMES!!!" talking point):

The Penn State team conducted the largest study to date on the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of having the coronavirus vs. experiencing inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers compared patients with COVID-19 — vaccinated and unvaccinated — to those without the virus. They found the risk of myocarditis was 15 times higher in COVID-19 patients

So, it's MORE THAN 7x, then, in that study.

I posted a meta-analysis of 22 studies, Cletus.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine.
 
(Via psu.edu, who sponsored Joe's infamous "SEVEN TIMES!!!" talking point):

The Penn State team conducted the largest study to date on the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of having the coronavirus vs. experiencing inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers compared patients with COVID-19 — vaccinated and unvaccinated — to those without the virus. They found the risk of myocarditis was 15 times higher in COVID-19 patients, regardless of vaccination status, compared to individuals who did not contract the virus. (Bad science here: vaxxed and unvaxxed subjects MUST be evaluated separately due to the possibility of ADE, a very real threat that Offit, Fauci, Hotez et al warned about in 2020).


Next, the researchers separately compared the rates of myocarditis in those who received the vaccines to those in unvaccinated individuals. According to the findings, the rates of myocarditis in people who were vaccinated against COVID-19 were twofold higher than in unvaccinated people. (Remember Joe; your study...not mine). 😁🤡

Independent study: FOUND THE SAME RESULT

7x HIGHER RISK FROM COVID, THAN FROM VACCINES


 
Independent study: FOUND THE SAME RESULT

7x HIGHER RISK FROM COVID, THAN FROM VACCINES


Independent?

Surprised Albert Bourla himself wasn't listed as one of the study's authors with all the conflicts admitted to in that link.

Myocarditis post-infection is seven times higher than post-injection.

Seven times!

SEVEN TIMES!!!!!!!
 
Did yall forget yet?

I forgot what this thread was about and I don’t feel like reading up on it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT