Well, if you cared you could search "germ" and "belemnole" in the search function and see that I've discussed my crazy ass SIL before in threads that weren't about your obsession.
Just so we're clear, the question was:
And my answer was:
What's your problem again?
It's amazing how bad Trump fu**ed over people like Pfizer; they gave him a million bucks to feed his ego for his inauguration and he was in their back pocket.
Sorry, I'm not God and don't know what's in threads I don't click on.
If your Nephews came out anti-vaccine, you'd probably ridicule them like you do me, right? Incentive for them not to tell you what they really think, right? Reputation is a strong incentive. Losing family and having family talk shit about you behind your back is a strong, strong incentive.
There's actually been some interesting studies that have left scientists confused as to what causes illness and disease. Although posting this for Big Pharma disciples is more than likely a waste of time. Enjoy!
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This is fun. You ask me a question. I answer. Then you tell me what my answer really is.
There's actually been some interesting studies that have left scientists confused as to what causes illness and disease. Although posting this for Big Pharma disciples is more than likely a waste of time. Enjoy!
Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco. The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer's bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgement: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
The State of Science, Microbiology, and Vaccines Circa 1918 - PMC
The influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 dramatically altered biomedical knowledge of the disease. At its onset, the foundation of scientific knowledge was information collected during the previous major pandemic of 1889–1890. The work of Otto ...
Right, that's why we still have so many measles cases.There's actually been some interesting studies that have left scientists confused as to what causes illness and disease. Although posting this for Big Pharma disciples is more than likely a waste of time. Enjoy!
Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco. The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer's bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgement: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
The State of Science, Microbiology, and Vaccines Circa 1918 - PMC
The influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 dramatically altered biomedical knowledge of the disease. At its onset, the foundation of scientific knowledge was information collected during the previous major pandemic of 1889–1890. The work of Otto ...
Would your nephews coming out as anti-vax change your tune to the anti-vax crowd?
Lol…doctors were still bleeding people in 1918.There's actually been some interesting studies that have left scientists confused as to what causes illness and disease. Although posting this for Big Pharma disciples is more than likely a waste of time. Enjoy!
Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco. The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer's bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results. He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgement: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
The State of Science, Microbiology, and Vaccines Circa 1918 - PMC
The influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 dramatically altered biomedical knowledge of the disease. At its onset, the foundation of scientific knowledge was information collected during the previous major pandemic of 1889–1890. The work of Otto ...
Hey, maybe that was the real cure for Covid. We don’t know until we try it. Maybe naturalbornhawk can try it out next time he gets Covid.
I have no doubt that this percentage is actually on the low side. Think of all the people scared to speak out in fear of being fired from their jobs, cancelled on social media, or have their lives threatened by big pharma. I mean, just look at Vaers, X, and Facebook for all these confirmed/verified cases being shared."Nearly a quarter of respondents — 24 percent — said they knew someone personally who died from side effects of a Covid-19 shot."
A QUARTER of Americans now say COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe: poll
'Growing numbers now distrust health-protecting, life-saving vaccines,' said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, which surveyed more than 1,500 adults last month.www.dailymail.co.uk
Precisely...very dark.
www.cureus.com
People tried to talk about this at the time. But, they got shouted down pretty quickly.
Censorship, straight out of the Nazi playbook. You must be so thankful!
Lol…who the fvck is being censored? They’re openly bleating on X, dumbass. Their blatant lying traces a straight path back to Wakefield - your patron saint.
When the 'experts' are saying stuff like this (cell.com rethinking next-gen vaccines) 3 years into the covid pandemic it's no wonder people are growing skeptical: 🤡's
You say that as if you think Youtube isn't censoring. That's pretty dumb.
Are you referring to the Wakefield study that made the following conclusions?
There is not a lower human lifeform than the antivaxxer...so you've got that going for you. If there is a Nazi allegory here, it would be the people who purposefully lie knowing they are killing people including children by fooling them into forgoing a simple life-saving medical procedure. Go light your candle for "Saint" Wakefield. Then drop dead.
Sorry, but it's pretty incredible there are still idiots out there dumb enough to believe this. The cat's been out of the bag for quite awhile now that it's probably not a good idea to keep getting vaccinated, especially children.
Vaccine profiteers who value profits above all else - safety and efficacy come to mind - are the real Nazis. All these benign childhood illnesses were never in need of "simple life-saving medical procedures" and I already quoted from Wakefield's retracted study: he never said what you say he said, tool.
Tarheel hates Wakefield about as much as a triple mask + face sheilder on their 9th booster hates Trump.
The guy who's backed hardcore censorship and mandatory vaccination for the last 3-4 years is telling us we're the Nazis.
