No, we're not going to forget
- Thread starter naturalbornhawk
- Start date
I wonder how that Duke ivermectin study turned out…have an update?
This would go a long way towards fixing the medical tyranny we’re under.
childrenshealthdefense.org
New Law Would Make COVID Vaccine Makers Liable for Injuries, Deaths
Children’s Health Defense is among the organizations that support a bill introduced Tuesday by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) that would remove the liability shield for manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines and open the door for vaccine-injured Americans to sue companies like Pfizer and Moderna.
childrenshealthdefense.org
This would go a long way towards fixing the medical tyranny we’re under.
New Law Would Make COVID Vaccine Makers Liable for Injuries, Deaths
Children’s Health Defense is among the organizations that support a bill introduced Tuesday by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) that would remove the liability shield for manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines and open the door for vaccine-injured Americans to sue companies like Pfizer and Moderna.
Keep preachin' your bullshit to the MAGA masses, yo!!!
Meanwhile, Covid will keep doing God's work here:
Lol @ Eric Topol. The guy so triggered by Fat Donny that he was willing to sacrifice lives in order that vaccines weren’t approved before the November, 2020 election.
On September 25, Topol joined 60 other experts in sending a letter to Pfizer’s CEO, asking that the company not apply for an EUA before late November, when there would be more safety data.
Any push to rush through a vaccine approval, in other words, would be motivated politically more than medically. Even though the pandemic is killing more than 600 people a day in the US, Topol doesn’t believe very much can be gained by declaring success a few weeks early.
A week later, on Friday, October 16, Pfizer—citing the FDA recommendations—finally said it would not seek an EUA until after the election, even if the company thought its vaccine was working.
Playing games with people’s lives over a stupid election. Shameless.
On September 25, Topol joined 60 other experts in sending a letter to Pfizer’s CEO, asking that the company not apply for an EUA before late November, when there would be more safety data.
Any push to rush through a vaccine approval, in other words, would be motivated politically more than medically. Even though the pandemic is killing more than 600 people a day in the US, Topol doesn’t believe very much can be gained by declaring success a few weeks early.
A week later, on Friday, October 16, Pfizer—citing the FDA recommendations—finally said it would not seek an EUA until after the election, even if the company thought its vaccine was working.
Playing games with people’s lives over a stupid election. Shameless.
Then we agree - there's no reason the Covid vaccine makers should continue to have a liability waiver.
Eric Topol did not publish the linked article, Dipshit.
Actually, there is a "reason", and that is the waiver granted for ALL vaccines for decades.
Cletus.
In this paper, we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike glycoprotein mRNA to produce high levels of spike-glycoprotein-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.
would you like to cite the backup for that claim? You emphasized ALL. Lets see if it's true.
Will you acknowledge that mRNA vaccines are different from live or dead virus vaccines? Would you acknowledge that some vaccines have been required over time, and others are voluntary?
Yes; vaccines are indemnified from lawsuits. You can look up the statutes on that if you want.
Not a SINGLE immunologist, virologist or biologist on that "paper" from any reputable university, Cletus.
aComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02139
bImmersion Health, Portland, OR, 97214, USA
cResearch and Development, Nasco AD Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Research and Development, Sachtouri 11, 18536, Piraeus, Greece
dTruth for Health Foundation, Tucson, AZ, USA
Makes no difference. We have vaccines of many different "types" that are all under the same statute.
Yeah the manufacturer's were getting their asses handed to them in court due to injuries....manufacturers threatened to stop making them....manufacturers were granted waiver in 1986. Did I get the high points?
Also, ambulance-chasing court claims for faux "injuries".
Which is why they were indemnified and the federal system was set up to deal with injuries.
Because the alternative was "no vaccines", taking us back to the 1880s and early 1900s with childhood mortality rates of 20%-30% before 5 years of age...
Per the HEW/CDC mortality statistics I’ve posted multiple times, the mortality rate for measles in 1962 prior to the vaccine was ≤ the mortality rate for measles today (if CDC is to be believed).
That's because most people do not die directly from measles.
Measles erases your immune system memory, and you die from exposure to something you were previously immune to.
Link?
Right. The danger was significant enough to wipe them out. Then they set up a kangaroo court and HHS never fulfilled its safety monitoring obligations. An awfully crappy resume for a product people here feel can do no wrong.
Just remember; ‘safe and effective’ was no lie.
It was two damned lies.🤨
No; the risk was going to prevent them from manufacturing vaccines.
Which have saved hundreds of millions of lives since they've been in existence.
No, I'd like you to cite them. You made an emphatic claim. Back it up. ALL.
“Same old tired memes” that just so happen to cite the various pharmaceutical company’s trial data to support their claims. 😁
No surprise here.“Long Covid may be no different from other post-viral syndromes such as those experienced after flu, according to new research from Queensland Health.
The lead author of the study, the state’s chief health officer Dr John Gerrard, said it was “time to stop using terms like ‘long Covid’” because they imply there is something unique about the longer-term symptoms associated with the virus, and in some cases create hypervigilance.
The results of the study, which Gerrard will present next month at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases in Barcelona, found no evidence that those who had Covid-19 were more likely to have functional limitations a year on compared with those who did not have Covid-19 (3.0% v 4.1%).
The 3% of the study participants who had ongoing impairments after Covid-19 infection was similar to the 3.4% with ongoing impairments after influenza.”
Time to stop using term ‘long Covid’ as symptoms no worse than those after flu, Queensland’s chief health officer says
Researchers compared the symptoms and impairment of Covid and influenza patients a year after they tested positive
“The study is observational, based on reported symptoms with no physiological or detailed functional follow-up data. Without laboratory pathophysiological assessment of individual patients, it is impossible to say that this is indistinguishable from flu-related or any other post-viral syndrome,” Nicholson said.
“Long Covid may be no different from other post-viral syndromes such as those experienced after flu, according to new research from Queensland Health.
The lead author of the study, the state’s chief health officer Dr John Gerrard, said it was “time to stop using terms like ‘long Covid’” because they imply there is something unique about the longer-term symptoms associated with the virus, and in some cases create hypervigilance.
The results of the study, which Gerrard will present next month at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases in Barcelona, found no evidence that those who had Covid-19 were more likely to have functional limitations a year on compared with those who did not have Covid-19 (3.0% v 4.1%).
The 3% of the study participants who had ongoing impairments after Covid-19 infection was similar to the 3.4% with ongoing impairments after influenza.”
Time to stop using term ‘long Covid’ as symptoms no worse than those after flu, Queensland’s chief health officer says
Researchers compared the symptoms and impairment of Covid and influenza patients a year after they tested positivewww.theguardian.com
It is also a VERY small study. Conclusion you are making here would not be justified at this point. Particularly with the wealth of physiological data on Long Covid indicating it IS much worse than other viruses, like flu.
They all look smug & happy about destroying the economy.
You really are asking why normal media outlets aren’t deemed conspiracy theories?
It was quite obvious.
‘Public health’ was the last thing on their little minds, and the pervasive promotion of masks, distancing, vaccines, etc., was pure theater, playing into their experiment on mass psychosis.
It was. Though there were countries, like Burundi, that wisely chose not to participate.
