ADVERTISEMENT

NOT GUILTY!!!!! TIME TO STRING SOME marxists UP!!! MAGA!

Put your paperback down, kid, you’re going to hurt yourself…
Hey man, you do you. But the reason you don’t get much attention is most posters on here have already ignored you because you come across as a raging lunatic with increasingly violent rhetoric.

You just seem so wound up - can’t afford to pay your bills or something? Maybe relax a bit is all I’m saying. After all, I highly doubt the debt collector will repossess your shitty double wide.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
Hey man, you do you. But the reason you don’t get much attention is most posters on here have already ignored you because you come across as a raging lunatic with increasingly violent rhetoric.

You just seem so wound up - can’t afford to pay your bills or something? Maybe relax a bit is all I’m saying. After all, I highly doubt the debt collector will repossess your shitty double wide.
You’re a scream and I hope you get lots and lots of attention here!! You can even have mine! 😂🎂
 
i know this isn't the place for nuanced discussion of anything

but i think reasonable people can disagree or at least be concerned about where we draw the line on appropriate defense of self/others and vigilantism
This needed to go to trial. He killed a person.

I agree with the jury’s verdict. I expected a hung jury and dismissal, but it’s the same end. There was no conspiracy. The jury saw what many of us did. Justice was served.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
Hey man, you do you. But the reason you don’t get much attention is most posters on here have already ignored you because you come across as a raging lunatic with increasingly violent rhetoric.

You just seem so wound up - can’t afford to pay your bills or something? Maybe relax a bit is all I’m saying. After all, I highly doubt the debt collector will repossess your shitty double wide.
73a7e5ba284dbc52f0605380adc4730e61d3b92751cbf0735dbd49b4c064916d_1.jpg
 
OMG….does your know you have three pussys? 😂🤡🏆❄️
Dude, all you do all day is go on the internet all day and say that people deserve to be hurt because of their political beliefs. You're the definition of an internet tough guy. Literally everyone that isn't a troll or a bot is laughing at you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
Who's your favorite iowa football player of all time?
Eddie, Keith Chappelle....maybe Phil Blatcher because I served with him, but mostly the game he had vs. MSU to clinch Hayden's first Rose Bowl. Want my favorite color too?
 
Eddie, Keith Chappelle....maybe Phil Blatcher because I served with him, but mostly the game he had vs. MSU to clinch Hayden's first Rose Bowl. Want my favorite color too?

Nope, maybe your favorite gas station pizza. I never got to see Eddie play but he was great. Nick bell is my favorite player.
 
Eddie, Keith Chappelle....maybe Phil Blatcher because I served with him, but mostly the game he had vs. MSU to clinch Hayden's first Rose Bowl. Want my favorite color too?
I drank beers with him the night he did that! He lived in Bon Aire mobile home park in IC next to a buddy of mine. He stopped in after returning from the game. I thought maybe he was married already. He ran for over 200 yards that game but couldn't have been more than 5'8".
 
I drank beers with him the night he did that! He lived in Bon Aire mobile home park in IC next to a buddy of mine. He stopped in after returning from the game. I thought maybe he was married already. He ran for over 200 yards that game but couldn't have been more than 5'8".
He was 5’ 8”…..in heels….the stereotypical brick shithouse. The hot girl that owned the bookstore? He may have been married then….though I don’t know why and I know it didn’t last terribly long as he liked his fun, with or without a ring 💍 😂 Not sure what happened to him? Last I heard he was working for a natural gas company back in Nawlins.
 
Nope, maybe your favorite gas station pizza. I never got to see Eddie play but he was great. Nick bell is my favorite player.
I think the first time I masterbated was the day the Chiefs drafted him! Most kids my age just wanted a new Schwinn 5 speed stingray that was so popular at the time. I just wanted my older sister to marry Eddie!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dgordo
Dude, all you do all day is go on the internet all day and say that people deserve to be hurt because of their political beliefs. You're the definition of an internet tough guy. Literally everyone that isn't a troll or a bot is laughing at you.
Why don't you curl up with teddy and blankie under your toddler bed and have a nice long cry!
 
This needed to go to trial. He killed a person.

I agree with the jury’s verdict. I expected a hung jury and dismissal, but it’s the same end. There was no conspiracy. The jury saw what many of us did. Justice was served.
Thats asinine. I’ve been in Law Enforcement for over 25 years. There certainly isn’t a trial every time there is a homicide. Law Enforcement gathers the facts (physical evidence, witness statements, video evidence, toxicology reports etc) and then presents them to a District Attorney. DAs reject cases everyday for all kinds of reasons. 1 very common reason for a DA reject is if the DAs office doesn’t feel confident about their ability to get a conviction. This case seemed to be a clear cut justifiable homicide. Did it any point appear that Penny wanted Neely to die? Did it appear that he was trying to kill him? Obviously not. If Neely has lived, would the DAs office have filed assault charges against Penny? Certainly not. The charges were politically motivated. Thank God the jury got it right.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day

Thats asinine. I’ve been in Law Enforcement for over 25 years. There certainly isn’t a trial every time there is a homicide. Law Enforcement gathers the facts (physical evidence, witness statements, video evidence, toxicology reports etc) and then presents them to a District Attorney. DAs reject cases everyday for all kinds of reasons. 1 very common reason for a DA reject is if the DAs office doesn’t feel confident about their ability to get a conviction. This case seemed to be a clear cut justifiable homicide. Did it any point appear that Penny wanted Neely to die? Did it appear that he was trying to kill him? Obviously not. If Neely has lived, would the DAs office have filed assault charges against Penny? Certainly not. The charges were politically motivated. Thank God the jury got it right.

Thats asinine. I’ve been in Law Enforcement for over 25 years. There certainly isn’t a trial every time there is a homicide. Law Enforcement gathers the facts (physical evidence, witness statements, video evidence, toxicology reports etc) and then presents them to a District Attorney. DAs reject cases everyday for all kinds of reasons. 1 very common reason for a DA reject is if the DAs office doesn’t feel confident about their ability to get a conviction. This case seemed to be a clear cut justifiable homicide. Did it any point appear that Penny wanted Neely to die? Did it appear that he was trying to kill him? Obviously not. If Neely has lived, would the DAs office have filed assault charges against Penny? Certainly not. The charges were politically motivated. Thank God the jury got it right.
@mnole03, hasn't been right in a thread he's delved into since Christ was a Corporal.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: so cal hawkfan
Thats asinine. I’ve been in Law Enforcement for over 25 years. There certainly isn’t a trial every time there is a homicide. Law Enforcement gathers the facts (physical evidence, witness statements, video evidence, toxicology reports etc) and then presents them to a District Attorney. DAs reject cases everyday for all kinds of reasons. 1 very common reason for a DA reject is if the DAs office doesn’t feel confident about their ability to get a conviction. This case seemed to be a clear cut justifiable homicide. Did it any point appear that Penny wanted Neely to die? Did it appear that he was trying to kill him? Obviously not. If Neely has lived, would the DAs office have filed assault charges against Penny? Certainly not. The charges were politically motivated. Thank God the jury got it right.
You’re aware this went before a grand jury, right?

If it was so clear cut, there wouldn’t have been an indictment. What you described would be just as true in a case of negligent homicide.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
You’re aware this went before a grand jury, right?

If it was so clear cut, there wouldn’t have been an indictment. What you described would be just as true in a case of negligent homicide.
Lol. I just peed a little. This was CLEARLY politically motivated. Just like Bragg’s last “prosecution”. The indictment had nothing to do with guilt or innocence. Had this trial happened just a few years ago I’m not confident the same decision would’ve been reached. The outrage from the BLM community decrying that the ONLY crime Jordan committed was the color of his skin (despite perviously being arrested 42 times!), and commenting that the ONLY reason he was acquitted was due to the 9 white jurors is absolutely despicable. Fortunately, America seems to be (finally) waking up and these race baiting grifters time appears to be up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
Lol. I just peed a little. This was CLEARLY politically motivated. Just like Bragg’s last “prosecution”. The indictment had nothing to do with guilt or innocence. Had this trial happened just a few years ago I’m not confident the same decision would’ve been reached. The outrage from the BLM community decrying that the ONLY crime Jordan committed was the color of his skin (despite perviously being arrested 42 times!), and commenting that the ONLY reason he was acquitted was due to the 9 white jurors is absolutely despicable. Fortunately, America seems to be (finally) waking up and these race baiting grifters time appears to be up.
He was indicted by a grand jury. The indictment was absolutely related to probable cause. Whether there was a defense was a question for the finders of fact.

Sorry about your incontinence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: so cal hawkfan
He was indicted by a grand jury. The indictment was absolutely related to probable cause. Whether there was a defense was a question for the finders of fact.

Sorry about your incontinence.
Dude, how naive are you?!
Probable cause isn’t a tangible thing, it’s made up.
Probable cause is a legal standard that means there is a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed or that a particular person is responsible for a crime.
Someone (typically a DA or Grand Jury) looks at a set of circumstances and says, “yup that’s probable cause”. It doesn’t make it so. In this case they were WRONG. There was never ANY evidence that would lead any reasonable person to believe that Penny was malicious or negligent while he was restraining Jordan.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
He was indicted by a grand jury. The indictment was absolutely related to probable cause. Whether there was a defense was a question for the finders of fact.

Sorry about your incontinence.
Years ago I was involved in a case where one parolee stabbed another parolee through the lung during a bar fight. The stabee’s sister got into her car, followed the knife wielding a-hole and then ran him over with her car nearly killing him. The officers on scene arrested the sister and the stabber for attempted murder.

When the detectives brought the case to the LA County DA’s office, the DA said, there’s no way I’m going to convict this lady who was clearly protecting her brother who she believed was just stabbed to death. She decided that no probable cause existed and the suspect was released “in the interest of justice”. No trial, no charges, nothing. That kind of thing happens EVERY DAY in courthouses all across the country and it’s what should’ve happened in the Penny case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
This needed to go to trial. He killed a person.
Wait? What about Alec Baldwin? He killed a person, however I don’t recall there being a trial. What about probable cause? You don’t suppose something other than the facts and circumstances of the case influenced that decision do you?

Take the L already son, you’re out of your league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day
Wait? What about Alec Baldwin? He killed a person, however I don’t recall there being a trial. What about probable cause? You don’t suppose something other than the facts and circumstances of the case influenced that decision do you?

Take the L already son, you’re out of your league.
Most of the miscreants posting here can’t do that. They are like woodticks….you keep stomping, but they just keep crawling.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: so cal hawkfan
Wait? What about Alec Baldwin? He killed a person, however I don’t recall there being a trial. What about probable cause? You don’t suppose something other than the facts and circumstances of the case influenced that decision do you?

Take the L already son, you’re out of your league.
Alec Baldwin’s case went to trial but was tossed because of a Brady violation.

At least know what you’re talking about.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bcherod
Alec Baldwin’s case went to trial but was tossed because of a Brady violation.

At least know what you’re talking about.

Oh, I know what I’m talking about. 1 day before the Penny case Jordan Williams stabbed a white homeless man to death on a train for punching his girlfriend. Charges dropped (as they should have been). Suspiciously under reported wouldn’t you say?

So Grand Juries can decline to file charges? The hell you say.
 

Oh, I know what I’m talking about. 1 day before the Penny case Jordan Williams stabbed a white homeless man to death on a train for punching his girlfriend. Charges dropped (as they should have been). Suspiciously under reported wouldn’t you say?

So Grand Juries can decline to file charges? The hell you say.
So the DAs prosecuted both cases and different grand juries looking at different fact sets reached different conclusions.

What was your point?
 
So the DAs prosecuted both cases and different grand juries looking at different fact sets reached different conclusions.

What was your point?
Dude, you really suck at this. You said “this needed to go to trial, he killed someone.” Which we both can agree now that you were wrong and that you made an asinine comment. The fact that a similar set of circumstances occurred within a day of each other in the same city. Objectively, stabbing someone to death is a bit more gruesome and vicious than inadvertently choking a violent person to death while attempting to restrain them. It’s clear that one prosecution was motivated by skin color and politics and the other was motivated by the common sense application of law. The fact that the stabbing death garnered next to zero news reporting is further evidence of bias in politically motivated prosecutions.
 
Dude, you really suck at this. You said “this needed to go to trial, he killed someone.” Which we both can agree now that you were wrong and that you made an asinine comment. The fact that a similar set of circumstances occurred within a day of each other in the same city. Objectively, stabbing someone to death is a bit more gruesome and vicious than inadvertently choking a violent person to death while attempting to restrain them. It’s clear that one prosecution was motivated by skin color and politics and the other was motivated by the common sense application of law. The fact that the stabbing death garnered next to zero news reporting is further evidence of bias in politically motivated prosecutions.
You seem incapable of understanding the cases have different facts, like the guy in the Williams case was physically attacking passengers including the assailant’s girlfriend.

You also don’t seem to understand your view isn’t controlling. The state prosecuted both cases. The grand jury in the Penny case found probable cause. The case needed to go to trial.
 
You seem incapable of understanding the cases have different facts, like the guy in the Williams case was physically attacking passengers including the assailant’s girlfriend.

You also don’t seem to understand your view isn’t controlling. The state prosecuted both cases. The grand jury in the Penny case found probable cause. The case needed to go to trial.
Like most white liberals (yes I know you’re white, I can smell your white guilt halfway across the country) you fail to see that the key difference is that in one case a white male killed a black male. In the other case a black male killed a white male. In one case a mentally ill subject was threatening to kill multiple passengers and they were in fear for their lives. The other one passenger was punched by a mentally ill passenger. Both instances reasonably would cause anyone who is not a coward, to protect innocent people. Nobody in either of these situations, should have to defend themselves from 12 people that couldn’t get out of jury duty. And again probable cause ISN’T tangible, It’s arbitrary. If Penny was black, and Neely was white, rest assured, no probable cause would’ve been found. I mean ask yourself honestly if someone was assaulting your wife, would it be more reasonable to physically subdue them or stab them to death? Penny should never have had to fight for his freedom. This prosecution wounds our nation, it will make people hesitate to do the right thing for fear of being prosecuted criminally.
 
Sure. Sometimes he talks about how Hitler was a good leader. Guy's solid.
He was asking me about HBotus,

Change your pants, you have pissed yourself.

Then, slap your teachers who lied and told you they taught you critical thinking.

If you can't get past "can bad people do good things" or " can a horrible person have good attributes" you are a mental midget.
 
He was asking me about HBotus,

Change your pants, you have pissed yourself.

Then, slap your teachers who lied and told you they taught you critical thinking.

If you can't get past "can bad people do good things" or " can a horrible person have good attributes" you are a mental midget.
Oh look. A horrible person is triggered.
 
Oh look. A horrible person is triggered.
You felt strongly enough about a day old post to bring up a lie from weeks ago.....


What I was actually here to do was read here-4-ever make a fool of himself.


Now, diapers add up, change them again and let's see if you can hold it for an hour or two this time.
 
You felt strongly enough about a day old post to bring up a lie from weeks ago.....


What I was actually here to do was read here-4-ever make a fool of himself.


Now, diapers add up, change them again and let's see if you can hold it for an hour or two this time.
Too cold for you to be out hunting rabbits--on public because no one would allow your goofy looking ass on their land even if you had the balls to knock on their door--with your trusty slingshot?!

Come on, HROT, can't someone step up and take this kid squirrel hunting before he cries?!?!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT