ADVERTISEMENT

Obama the Nobel Peace Prize winner sends US special forces to Syria.

HawktimusPrime

HB Legend
Mar 23, 2015
16,535
4,652
113
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/politics/syria-troops-special-operations-forces/index.html

The United States is set to deploy U.S. troops on the ground in Syria for the first time to advise and assist rebel forces combating ISIS, multiple officials said.

The White House is expected to announce Friday that the U.S. will deploy a small number of U.S. Special Operations forces to Kurdish-controlled territory in northern Syria. The American troops will help local Kurdish and Arab forces fighting ISIS with logistics and are planning to bolster their efforts.

U.S. Special Ops have previously conducted secretive missions on the ground in Syria, but the deployment marks the first permanent presence of U.S. ground troops in Syria since the U.S. began leading an international effort last year to confront ISIS, the militant Islamist group which now controls broad swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria.



Also, rumors of US forces engaging in combat once again within Iraq.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/23/polit...e-raid-wheeler/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

The first death in four years of an American service member under enemy fire in Iraq is raising questions about the nature of the U.S. commitment there and whether the administration is correct to claim that it's not engaged in a combat role.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter declared Friday, a day after the death of Master Sgt. Joshua Wheeler in a hostage rescue mission, that the incident didn't mean that the United States had returned to combat in Iraq, but rather was part of the training and assistance that a detachment of approximately 3,000 troops are providing Iraqis fighting ISIS.
 
Let's hear the deranged followers and defenders of Obama spin this one. Now I've never hated, nor loved Obama, because I know what he really is. What he is, is your typical puppet stringed President. He answers to the MIC and Business elite. He never had real international ties or connections or even experience in any of these matters, but he was a good speaker and therefore could easily fool the morons into thinking he was going to be a savior. Wrong, he's just one of the boys people.

Obama derangement isn't those who criticize him. It's a term that is used for the ones that will argue for his actions no matter what those actions are. Simply trying to spin your way out the tough questions and completely ignoring how many things he has done to undermine the liberties and safety of this country is truly deranged.
 
He's doing this one on his own.

I am not sure why he wouldn't try to engage Congress.
Whoever is pulling his strings has probably told him not to worry with Congress. Plus I believe the NDAA provisions he added make it easier for him to bypass Congress, because money and resource allocation is now indefinite as long as certain criteria exists.
 
You can't be serious, right?

;)
Bashful.gif~original
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
You can't be serious, right?

;)
NOTE: Obama signing the provisions that he has with NDAA, also gives that power to the Cons should they win the election. A curious move from a Democrat, when you know that it is only a matter of time before a Con gets into office.

Very similar to how Bush signed in TARP just before Obama took over the position of HPIC.

It's almost as if the election process is a simple passing of the baton.
 
Are we looking for a serious debate in here or is this more of a typical post from the OP? Just want to make sure i know the rules before posting

kthxbai
There is no debate, there is simply proof that your President is no different than a Con. Case closed. Discussion may follow though, regardless of the fact that you seem to feel as if you need to come here and defend your boy.
 
So? What's the verdict? He said he wouldn't put boots on the ground, but that's exactly what he's doing. Stop diverting by bashing the OP and address the question.

Do you defend Obama for doing this or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pepperman
regardless of the fact that you seem to feel as if you need to come here and defend your boy.

I don't need to defend Obama. I nor any Democrat gave his the Nobel Peace Prize. The committee that decides who gets it decided he made enough change to deserve the award. It sure does look funny 6 years later when he's declaring war in Syria, but in 2009 they felt he was the one who deserved the prize. So by all means boycott the Nobel Peace Prize if it makes you feel better, but don't act like those who support or have supported Obama in the past were the people who awarded him the prize.
 
So? What's the verdict? He said he wouldn't put boots on the ground, but that's exactly what he's doing. Stop diverting by bashing the OP and address the question.

Do you defend Obama for doing this or not?
The 'why do liberals ignore racism against whites' thread proved that they won't answer questions that will show the truth in who they really are.
 
Partisans don't really care about this. Being a "Proud American" is a tough job. Bite your tongue when D-Guy does it, then rail at the fences when R-Guy does it... and somehow bullshit yourself that you're not a hypocrite. The leaders are just like the followers, and vice versa. Well, except the leaders at least have much bigger bank accounts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coloradonoles
I don't need to defend Obama. I nor any Democrat gave his the Nobel Peace Prize. The committee that decides who gets it decided he made enough change to deserve the award. It sure does look funny 6 years later when he's declaring war in Syria, but in 2009 they felt he was the one who deserved the prize. So by all means boycott the Nobel Peace Prize if it makes you feel better, but don't act like those who support or have supported Obama in the past were the people who awarded him the prize.
Yes, but you certainly didn't detest him getting it. There are others who have defended him receiving it by the way. I'm glad you admit that he doesn't deserve it. He didn't deserve it then by the way, it was insulting. No one in the US government deserves that prize.
 
Micro-aggressions.

Why do you hate the LGTB community?

I don't have any hate for the ladyboys of Thailand. I'm sure they fill some type of void for people like the OP. Different strokes for different folks.
 
That's an ugly realization. It's easier to ridicule the thread, or the question, or the poster, or anyone you can rather than face the music.
Exactly my friend, and that is also exactly my point. Make no mistake I could easily turn that method towards the Cons when asking how they support freedom, yet they support also taking the freedom from others in their own countries.
 
How come lady boy? I'm curious. You do realize I'm not the one with b!tch t!ts correct?

Bitch tits doesn't make the lady boy. Feminine features are what they're really looking for. Your scrawny frame, lack of an Adam's apple, etc, etc, etc. They can always bolt some tits on you after you complete your transformation.
 
Bitch tits doesn't make the lady boy. Feminine features are what they're really looking for. Your scrawny frame, lack of an Adam's apple, etc, etc, etc. They can always bolt some tits on you after you complete your transformation.
Did you say I have a scrawny frame? That's cute. Not true at all, but cute.
 
Yes, but you certainly didn't detest him getting it. There are others who have defended him receiving it by the way. I'm glad you admit that he doesn't deserve it.

Not sure why you have such a hard time understanding that the Democrats didn't issue the prize. I've never seen it as a counter-argument to anything regarding Obama. You act like the only talking point they have is "Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize". I don't think anyone is keeping that in their back pocket for argument's sake.

He didn't deserve it then by the way, it was insulting. No one in the US government deserves that prize.

I think if you actually did some research on why it was awarded to Theodore Roosevelt you'd change your mind about nobody deserving it in the US government. It's not your style though to actually educate yourself
 
Not sure why you have such a hard time understanding that the Democrats didn't issue the prize. I've never seen it as a counter-argument to anything regarding Obama. You act like the only talking point they have is "Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize". I don't think anyone is keeping that in their back pocket for argument's sake.



I think if you actually did some research on why it was awarded to Theodore Roosevelt you'd change your mind about it nobody deserving it in the US government. It's not your style though to prove yourself wrong.
This must really burn you deep. I never said what I would teach you would make you feel better Frederick the Bless-ed.
 
Not sure why you have such a hard time understanding that the Democrats didn't issue the prize. I've never seen it as a counter-argument to anything regarding Obama. You act like the only talking point they have is "Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize". I don't think anyone is keeping that in their back pocket for argument's sake.



I think if you actually did some research on why it was awarded to Theodore Roosevelt you'd change your mind about nobody deserving it in the US government. It's not your style though to actually educate yourself
Forget about the damned Nobel Prize. We have yet another neo-con in the White House.
 
Forget about the damned Nobel Prize

Thanks for coming to Prime's rescue again, dad. He really appreciates you having his back.

I know it's your Modus operandi to hijack every thread you're apart of once your bullshit starts to fall apart but the OP brought up the Nobel prize and I like staying on subject.

Now run back your racist family and you can all have a good laugh when they call your girlfriend a derogatory name because of her skin color.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT