ADVERTISEMENT

Obamacare Shorts Insurers $2.5 Billion promised to them for sickest customers

YellowSnow51

HB King
Aug 14, 2002
62,402
4,328
113
Awesome. I'm sure this won't affect rates at all.

Insurers will get far less money than promised from the federal government this year — and a few billion dollars less than they requested — to help pay for their sickest customers.

Insurers learned late Thursday that they'll receive just $362 million out of the $2.9 billion in requested for 2014 for the program, according to an announcement by the Department of Health and Human Services.

That's because a program created under the 2010 Affordable Care Act hasn't brought in nearly as much money as it needs to pay out. As insurers enrolled more older, sicker Americans under the new healthcare law, they were promised some federal money to help cover their new costs, through a program known as risk corridors.

For example, if a health plan found itself with at least 3 percent more medical claims than it had anticipated, the government would reimburse it for half of those losses. If claims surpassed expectations by more than 8 percent, the government would pay 80 percent of the losses.

But the law requires the program to be budget-neutral, meaning that if there aren't adequate funds, insurers have to go without. The HHS announcement, insurers will get about $2.5 billion less than they asked for, and they weren't pleased.

"Stable, affordable coverage for consumers depends on adequate funding of the risk corridor program," said Marilyn Tavenner, CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans. "It's essential that Congress and CMS act to ensure the program works as designed and consumers are protected."

The administration insisted the insurers will still eventually get their entire payouts, sometime within the next two years of the temporary program. The program expires after 2016. HHS officials said that if there's still a shortfall after that point, the agency will "explore other sources of funding" and potentially work with Congress on the issue.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
 
Does this affect any of your neighbors or closest family members?
 
Remember the government doesn't have any money of it's own; it gets it from us.

So whether the government reimburses insurers, or insurers just raise our rates because the government stiffs them, the funds still come out of our wallets.

That's trickle down government at it's finest.
 
Remember the government doesn't have any money of it's own; it gets it from us.

So whether the government reimburses insurers, or insurers just raise our rates because the government stiffs them, the funds still come out of our wallets.

Wow. I have been wondering if there was anyone left that even knew this. See also, "minimum wage paid by employers...".
 
Several of the largest insurance companies saw Obamacare as an "Opportunity" and rushed to support it. They thought that they could game the new system to their advantage. The managements of these companies seemed to feel that in their particular cases, the government would turn out to be a friend.

In any case, this is how it is supposed to work in the free enterprise system. I am referring to the consequences part in that when you make a mistake in projecting your revenues, your shareholders take a huge hit. In this case, it should not have been too difficult to identify the impending risk in the setup. The managements of any company that actually went along with this system/scheme of profit determination via a form of central planning should be summarily fired. They had an obligation to their shareholders to protect their assets and they have failed miserably. They gave their business plan over to a bunch of stupid-arse liberals.

What in God's name did they expect? So be it.

This government from one end to the other is no friend of business. Maybe we could just go ahead and spend the all of the equity of all the healthcare insurance companies on subsidies to consumers. (You know ... negative profits for a few years!) Then maybe some of these companies will wake up to disadvantages of fettered capitalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22*43*51
Awesome. I'm sure this won't affect rates at all.

Insurers will get far less money than promised from the federal government this year — and a few billion dollars less than they requested — to help pay for their sickest customers.

Insurers learned late Thursday that they'll receive just $362 million out of the $2.9 billion in requested for 2014 for the program, according to an announcement by the Department of Health and Human Services.

That's because a program created under the 2010 Affordable Care Act hasn't brought in nearly as much money as it needs to pay out. As insurers enrolled more older, sicker Americans under the new healthcare law, they were promised some federal money to help cover their new costs, through a program known as risk corridors.

For example, if a health plan found itself with at least 3 percent more medical claims than it had anticipated, the government would reimburse it for half of those losses. If claims surpassed expectations by more than 8 percent, the government would pay 80 percent of the losses.

But the law requires the program to be budget-neutral, meaning that if there aren't adequate funds, insurers have to go without. The HHS announcement, insurers will get about $2.5 billion less than they asked for, and they weren't pleased.

"Stable, affordable coverage for consumers depends on adequate funding of the risk corridor program," said Marilyn Tavenner, CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans. "It's essential that Congress and CMS act to ensure the program works as designed and consumers are protected."

The administration insisted the insurers will still eventually get their entire payouts, sometime within the next two years of the temporary program. The program expires after 2016. HHS officials said that if there's still a shortfall after that point, the agency will "explore other sources of funding" and potentially work with Congress on the issue.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Interesting how liberals hate corporate welfare, and yet they are perfectly fine with bribing companies to get them to participate in Obamacare. What we also see is that Obamacare has never been viable, and they are going to come back to us for even more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Titus Andronicus
Interesting how liberals hate corporate welfare, and yet they are perfectly fine with bribing companies to get them to participate in Obamacare. What we also see is that Obamacare has never been viable, and they are going to come back to us for even more money.
Damn - you are on point with this. I hate it, but you are on point. :eek:
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT