Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he means Obama would have handled this better.What is Obamagate?
How could your president handle it?
No shit. I'd bet that is NOT Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory. I don't care what it says.You will find out! Not everything is as it seems.
I don't think that's true. I'm pretty sure Fox News would have something on it if it were.JFC
And I understand the 60,000 sealed indictments have been unsealed and mass arrests are taking place as we speak.
The Clintons, Obama, Holder, Pelosi, and Schiff are all being arrested by a secret cabal of U.S. Marshals, and backed by The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds, *and* Colonel Sanders before he went tits up.
Obama pushed to have Flynn and Trump framed, that is not going away.
What lie would that beYep poor old Flynn, framed into lying and then publicly admitting those lies.
What lie would that be
No you are dodging the questionAsk your overlord Drumpf, he said it.
Dude I didn’t even vote for Obama and I can pretty confidently say history will view him pretty favorably.Obama pushed to have Flynn and Trump framed, that is not going away.
Obama pushed to have Flynn and Trump framed, that is not going away.
What lie would that be
So what does it say ? He was not charged with perjury.The one identified in his signed plea agreement and his admission on the record in open Court.
Lay off the drugs. "Your" not making sense.If your nervous the docks are still open. Myself I'm changing clinics. I want a real Dr.
This comes from the source/party who used the fake dossierYeah, Bernard Kerik, moral authority (per his Wiki):
After the 2003 invasion of Iraq, President George W. Bush appointed Kerik as the interior minister of the Iraqi Coalition Provisional Authority. In 2004, Bush nominated Kerik to lead the Department of Homeland Security. However, Kerik soon withdrew his candidacy, explaining that he had employed an illegal immigrant as a nanny. His admission touched off state and federal investigations as a result of which in 2006 Kerik pleaded guilty in Bronx Supreme Court to two unrelated ethics violations (unclassified misdemeanors) and was ordered to pay $221,000 in fines. Kerik then pleaded guilty in 2009 in the Southern District of New York to eight federal charges, including tax fraud and false statements, and on February 18, 2010, was sentenced to four years in federal prison.[1] On February 18, 2020, President Donald Trump granted Kerik a full pardon.[2]
So helped create a debacle in Iraq, became a convicted tax fraud, a perjurer, a convicted felon and federal inmate, and now owes Trump a favor. Great source!
Yeah, Bernard Kerik, moral authority (per his Wiki):
After the 2003 invasion of Iraq, President George W. Bush appointed Kerik as the interior minister of the Iraqi Coalition Provisional Authority. In 2004, Bush nominated Kerik to lead the Department of Homeland Security. However, Kerik soon withdrew his candidacy, explaining that he had employed an illegal immigrant as a nanny. His admission touched off state and federal investigations as a result of which in 2006 Kerik pleaded guilty in Bronx Supreme Court to two unrelated ethics violations (unclassified misdemeanors) and was ordered to pay $221,000 in fines. Kerik then pleaded guilty in 2009 in the Southern District of New York to eight federal charges, including tax fraud and false statements, and on February 18, 2010, was sentenced to four years in federal prison.[1] On February 18, 2020, President Donald Trump granted Kerik a full pardon.[2]
So helped create a debacle in Iraq, became a convicted tax fraud, a perjurer, a convicted felon and federal inmate, and now owes Trump a favor. Great source!
I'd suggest all of them. Particularly the hallucinogens.Witch one can I lay off of?
That and utter stupidity.There's always another conspiracy. It's probably the single biggest commonality between MAGAs and Never Trump Republicans.
It's at the core of the party.
Dude I didn’t even vote for Obama and I can pretty confidently say history will view him pretty favorably.
The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds, *and* Colonel Sanders before he went tits up.
All presidents will have their missteps. Brought us out of the Great Recession, got people health insurance, big bull run in the stock market, eliminated Bin Laden. Overall, 2009-2016 were pretty good times for America.History will have a few issues to evaluate him for:
-The withdrawal from Iraq, leaving them defenseless against ISIS
-Allowing ISIS to become their own nation, ravaging the Middle East in the process
-The Iran deal
-Obamacare
-Paris Accords
-Screwing up Libya from one end to the other and six ways to Sunday.
-Ukraine/Crimea
-General Motors
-Chrysler
-Keystone Pipeline
-A non-performing economy
I do not see how one can evaluate him favorably with all of this stuff working against him.
Of course people have a way of forgetting these things.
Along with Lisa Paige commenting that the fbi had failed to inform him lying to the fbi was a crime-which is required
Just like you have a way of changing results.History will have a few issues to evaluate him for:
-The withdrawal from Iraq, leaving them defenseless against ISIS
-Allowing ISIS to become their own nation, ravaging the Middle East in the process
-The Iran deal
-Obamacare
-Paris Accords
-Screwing up Libya from one end to the other and six ways to Sunday.
-Ukraine/Crimea
-General Motors
-Chrysler
-Keystone Pipeline
-A non-performing economy
I do not see how one can evaluate him favorably with all of this stuff working against him.
Of course people have a way of forgetting these things.
No it’s not required. Stop lying or making shit up.
And it’s absolutely laughable that you believe the National Security Advisor of the United States doesn’t know that lying to the FBI is a crime. You know, the one he pleaded to and where admitted that he knew lying to the FBI was a crime.
In addition to Priestap’s handwritten notes, the initial batch of released documents included emails from the disgraced former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his lover, former FBI counsel Lisa Page. In one of the e-mails, Page discussed “just casually” slipping in towards the beginning of the interview that it is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 to make false statements to a federal agent, rather than mentioning it immediately following a statement which the agents believe to be false. That's called trying to pull a fast one when the interviewee would likely be paying less attention.
Take it up with Sidney Powell
No you are dodging the question
the FBI notes were released that prove he did nothing wrong. Sidney Powell requested further documents that would completely humiliate the FBI and the DOJ said uncle
Why do you keep lying? You said that warnings are required. They’re not. There is simply NO requirement that before you can be prosecuted for lying to the FBI, the FBI has to first give you a warning about lying to the FBI. None.
Just stop digging.
What is Obamagate?