ADVERTISEMENT

OK . . . Now I'm Getting Worried About the Market

See, you don't have to be an ass about it. Well, you do, it's in your blood. I was hoping you'd share some of the pieces you were reading to come to your conclusions.
You questioned where I got numbers for the DOW, trying to make it as though I based it on nothing, and I'm the asshole? Right...
 
Your inability to understand that people on high don't care about your measly needs is astounding. It's on you though.
There is nothing in your posts that address my point that our economies have been far steadier and healthier under the Fed. You simply spout off about something else. If you want to call that an intelligent response, knock yourself out. I call it avoiding the point.
 
There is nothing in your posts that address my point that our economies have been far steadier and healthier under the Fed. You simply spout off about something else. If you want to call that an intelligent response, knock yourself out. I call it avoiding the point.
No they haven't actually, and surprisingly it seems as if the Feds actions led to a lot of these issues in the past. The pushing for a central bank is what caused a lot of the problems. Not to mention that a country starting out and growing tends to have issues.

You want to support the institution that has led the continuation of the wealth gap then that is one you. You have no answer for that happening. None. You bitch about it all the time, yet you fail to see the main weapon being used to make sure it continues. It's not my fault you don't know how it works.
 
It's a thing called the internet. It allows you to look up the historic values of the market as well as the losses of each recession. Welcome to 2015.
That right there tells you everything you need to know about yourself. You don't even know what year you're in.
 
You want to support the institution that has led the continuation of the wealth gap then that is one you. You have no answer for that happening. None. You bitch about it all the time, yet you fail to see the main weapon being used to make sure it continues. It's not my fault you don't know how it works.
I find this to be an interesting argument. It is indisputable that the Fed has led to healthier economies. Surely, that health largely benefits the rich. But it also benefits the poor if for no other reason that healthier economies supports more jobs. Please explain how deeper recessions and less jobs benefits the poor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
That right there tells you everything you need to know about yourself. You don't even know what year you're in.
Wow. You got me on that one. Congrats. You've been getting owned on your everything else. I suppose even a dog deserves some scraps every once in a while.
 
Further, it is also indisputable that the inflation rates have been far healthier under the Fed. Please explain how wild inflation and deflation rates benefit the poor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
You questioned where I got numbers for the DOW, trying to make it as though I based it on nothing, and I'm the asshole? Right...

I questioned if you were forming your opinion based on pulling it out of your ass or from reading what experts were saying. I also said my post was no intended to be an insult. I was just trying to get you to give up your source.

So yes, you are an asshole with little knowledge on the market. Especially if you just now coming around to the fact that the market has been overvalued for quite some time. It's been propped up by the Fed's QE and 0% Interest Rates. This was a long time coming. Well, at least most people knew that.
 
The "fundamentals" are not bad. I would say there might be some over reaction but a drop to 14,000 is possible.

In regards to selling stocks now...don't panic. That is stressful and makes you a candidate to second guess.

BTW: Not a lot of $$$ involved, but after 9/11, I did panic and sold/transferred stock funds. Worst thing I ever did as an investor. Just forget about looking at your portfolio, as hard as that might be. And if your wife asks you how things are going, change the subject.;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
No they haven't actually, and surprisingly it seems as if the Feds actions led to a lot of these issues in the past. The pushing for a central bank is what caused a lot of the problems. Not to mention that a country starting out and growing tends to have issues.

You want to support the institution that has led the continuation of the wealth gap then that is one you. You have no answer for that happening. None. You bitch about it all the time, yet you fail to see the main weapon being used to make sure it continues. It's not my fault you don't know how it works.

You're talking to a guy that still believes it really matters who is in the WH.
 
I thought yesterday signaled the bottom. Then I wake up to this.

What do you guys see happening?

Time to panic and stop the blood flow by selling even though it means locking in big losses?

1. If you don't need the cash then don't sell.

2. If you have extra cash, then buy. Don't worry about buying at the absolute bottom.

3. Give it time and enjoy the inevitable ride back up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
Wow. You got me on that one. Congrats. You've been getting owned on your everything else. I suppose even a dog deserves some scraps every once in a while.
"Prime" is a doom and gloom guy/gal. If you preach that approach, eventually when the market does go down, you can say "See, I told you so".

When it goes back positive, he'll be as quiet as a church mouse. That's how he rolls.

AM I concerned? Yeah, a little. But history shows us that it's always been cyclical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
It knew exactly what it was doing. You make the silliest excuses for things. There are far more intelligent men who disagree with you.

I'm just curious. When you say they knew exactly what they were doing, what is "it" and what were they "doing"?
 
Back in 2008, days like today would end up 400 points. The intraday volatility was pretty wild.
 
"Prime" is a doom and gloom guy/gal. If you preach that approach, eventually when the market does go down, you can say "See, I told you so".

When it goes back positive, he'll be as quiet as a church mouse. That's how he rolls.

AM I concerned? Yeah, a little. But history shows us that it's always been cyclical.

No it's not actually, I'll still be here telling you what you don't want to hear.
 
No they haven't actually, and surprisingly it seems as if the Feds actions led to a lot of these issues in the past. The pushing for a central bank is what caused a lot of the problems. Not to mention that a country starting out and growing tends to have issues.

You want to support the institution that has led the continuation of the wealth gap then that is one you. You have no answer for that happening. None. You bitch about it all the time, yet you fail to see the main weapon being used to make sure it continues. It's not my fault you don't know how it works.

You are speaking in vague terms here. Please explain what the main weapon is and how "it" works. Honestly curious what you mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I'm just curious. When you say they knew exactly what they were doing, what is "it" and what were they "doing"?
What they were doing, was simply sitting back and waiting until when they felt the right time to take action would be. It's not necessarily what they were doing, but what they weren't doing. Despite the fact that they had a lot of power to have helped the recovery quicker. They didn't want to though.

That doesn't even cover what they did to help cause it in the first place. That's another conversation to be had. If you want explanation, I'll be glad to help.
 
You are speaking in vague terms here. Please explain what the main weapon is and how "it" works. Honestly curious what you mean.
The power to acquire money at command. The ability to say hey, we need money for this. Fed says, okay, here you go.
 
Get ready for 20%+ GDP losses and huge inflation problems. Because that is exactly what we had before the Fed. We haven't had more than 5% loss in the last 70 years. I'm in no hurry to change that. Thank god we have the Fed.
You mean the Fed that loves to print money? Yes, very responsible people.
 
What they were doing, was simply sitting back and waiting until when they felt the right time to take action would be. It's not necessarily what they were doing, but what they weren't doing. Despite the fact that they had a lot of power to have helped the recovery quicker. They didn't want to though.

That doesn't even cover what they did to help cause it in the first place. That's another conversation to be had. If you want explanation, I'll be glad to help.

Yea, so who is they? This is still extremely vague. Are you talking about the Great Depression or the 2008 recession?
 
If the stock market only made the rich richer the last 6 years, doesn't a pullback only make the rich less rich?
Some truth to that. We saw that in the 2008 crash.

Rich and poor take a hit and the rich may even take a proportionally bigger hit, on average. BUT - and this is a big but - they can afford it.

Moreover, they are positioned to bounce back - which we saw when things started to get better. Plus, if one of the 1% loses his house, he has others. Whereas if you or I lose our house, we're screwed.
 
Yea, so who is they? This is still extremely vague. Are you talking about the Great Depression or the 2008 recession?
The Fed is made of up 12 elite private members. A board if you will. I'm talking about the Depression. Before the depression began the Fed sent LOTS money and lowered interest rates. This helped cause the 1920's boom. Once the inflation started to set in, because they over did it, they raised interest rates. Obviously this slowed down lending and the dependence on money had grown too big. Investors knew this would eventually hit them, so they started to pull out of the market. The market slowed down considerably because of this. This continued and increased and the market crashed. Savings increased because of this and less spending in general occurred. Which helped the market nose dive more.

Less consumption, led to less production, then to less employment, then the cycle kept repeating.

So, because the Fed pumped too much money into the market, and because they had interest rates so low, the inflation and the market it expanded, suddenly popped when they were forced to stop doing those things because of the threat of hyper inflation. Had they kept everything on steadier flows, this would never have happened.

Then of course, as I said before, they sat back and watched for awhile, which is why it took so long to recover.

Notice the similarity to then and now?
 
Just from looking at historical measures the DOW is always up from one ten year period to the next. You could take any ten year period and see that the DOW ends up higher than it was ten years prior (this also works for most five year periods as well). What I take from this is that the DOW has proven historically to be a great long term investment.

That being said, it doesn't guarantee any future performance. All we have to go on is historical trends of course.

Dow 100 years
 
I find this to be an interesting argument. It is indisputable that the Fed has led to healthier economies. Surely, that health largely benefits the rich. But it also benefits the poor if for no other reason that healthier economies supports more jobs. Please explain how deeper recessions and less jobs benefits the poor?
It's only indisputable because THAT'S ALL WE'VE HAD. I don't believe you truly know very much about the Federal Reserve Banking cartel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jan Itor
Just from looking at historical measures the DOW is always up from one ten year period to the next. You could take any ten year period and see that the DOW ends up higher than it was ten years prior (this also works for most five year periods as well). What I take from this is that the DOW has proven historically to be a great long term investment.

That being said, it doesn't guarantee any future performance. All we have to go on is historical trends of course.

Dow 100 years

Yes, and?
 
Yes, and?

And I was giving factual data on the DOW since some had questions. I am not advocating for it or against it. Just wanted to add some data.

Just out of curiosity, what type of investments or financial vehicles are you sinking your money into given your feelings on the Fed?
 
And I was giving factual data on the DOW since some had questions. I am not advocating for it or against it. Just wanted to add some data.

Just out of curiosity, what type of investments or financial vehicles are you sinking your money into given your feelings on the Fed?
I already have property assets as my disposal. No need to invest in more. That combined with my annual savings plan, I have no need to invest at the time.

Actually, I do have a moderate 401k plan. So there's that.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT