Not sure what we have learned so far. Our guards are not good yet. PK is a concern. LBs are better than most thought.
Not sure what we have learned so far. Our guards are not good yet. PK is a concern. LBs are better than most thought.
UNI scored on the first teamers last night.Our starting D basically allowed 3 total points in all 3 games. That is crazy. Rest of their points were 2nd string scrub time. D line has looked great. Linebackers have stepped up and Dbacks looked good so far, which is helped by the pressure created by Dline.
Our offense always seems to take a bit to click. Best TE combo in country. RBs looking strong. Two starting tackles out week 1, trying different combos, etc but group looks to be coming into their own, granted it was UNI, but still a top 100 team. How did Nebbie do against Troy, basically same ranking by Sagarin as UNI 94/96. Receiver has been question mark and Easley looks solid, and hopefully ISM comes back healthy and can stretch the field.
UNI scored on the first teamers last night.
Delaney's dream is becoming reality. The best teams in the league have enough fluff teams to play that they do not rack up losses and the new teams (Rutgers, Nebby and Maryland) are nothing but hired fodder to pad wins for the Big Ten's long time powers. If Wisconsin and PSU end up with three or four losses each this year, it is possible Iowa could play an entire season without any of the opponents being ranked in the final AP poll.Only teams who are NOT garbage on schedule - WI, PSU
All others below 50
https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
I get a kick out of this. So ISU is garbage, but they beat Oklahoma last year, and played them a pretty solid game, looking much better against them they did against Iowa? Seriously? Niu is a solid football team. WAY better that the second tier teams most of these teams play. Why is it so important to rundown anything that the Hawks do?.......Only teams who are NOT garbage on schedule - WI, PSU
All others below 50
https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
UNI scored on the first teamers last night.
Went back and watched and you are right, with about 11 minutes left in 4th qtr. thanks to a bogus PI call on Gervase on 3rd and long/goal.
2nd would be on backups.
I think ISU is a very solid team this year, we will see. They gave Oklahoma all they wanted.I get a kick out of this. So ISU is garbage, but they beat Oklahoma last year, and played them a pretty solid game, looking much better against them they did against Iowa? Seriously? Niu is a solid football team. WAY better that the second tier teams most of these teams play. Why is it so important to rundown anything that the Hawks do?.......
Delaney's dream is becoming reality. The best teams in the league have enough fluff teams to play that they do not rack up losses and the new teams (Rutgers, Nebby and Maryland) are nothing but hired fodder to pad wins for the Big Ten's long time powers. If Wisconsin and PSU end up with three or four losses each this year, it is possible Iowa could play an entire season without any of the opponents being ranked in the final AP poll.
as much as you'd like to think Iowa state is not garbage they played Oklahoma top as well but if it makes you feel betterNot sure what we have learned so far. Our guards are not good yet. PK is a concern. LBs are better than most thought.
Delaney's move to add teams was a money grab and was not in any way a move to strengthen the league in regards to on field/court results. Having more teams means less conference losses for the elite teams if they can avoid playing each other much like the SEC has been doing for years. I appreciate the money for the coffers, but the move dilutes the product and sucks to see traditional rivalries like Iowa vs OSU go AWOL for years at a time to where Iowa misses out on many of the best teams in some years like this year might be. Just sucks IMO.Anyone else growing tired of these trolls pretending to be Iowa fans? What a bunch of pathetic losers.
Who give's a rat's as_? We play the people who are on our schedule. We only have control of two games I think!!! You must be related to Colin Cowherd.Delaney's dream is becoming reality. The best teams in the league have enough fluff teams to play that they do not rack up losses and the new teams (Rutgers, Nebby and Maryland) are nothing but hired fodder to pad wins for the Big Ten's long time powers. If Wisconsin and PSU end up with three or four losses each this year, it is possible Iowa could play an entire season without any of the opponents being ranked in the final AP poll.
this is why iowa gets killed in bowls lately. {except NYC]
The ones that we played. DefinedYes, UNI scored on our first team D, but they were not playing the same D they played the prior three qtrs. It looked more like a form of the prevent D. We let them complete everything under 10 yards for what I saw. And for the person that said every team we played is garbage? NIU the following week had a chance to beat Utah until the very end, and Iowa State basically played head to head with Oklahoma, so please, someone define garbage opponent? Not to mention, most football experts picked ISU to beat us. LOL
Ok, so everyone outside the top 25 is garbage.......Got it......The ones that we played. Defined
Ok, so everyone outside the top 25 is garbage.......Got it......![]()
Not sure what we have learned so far. Our guards are not good yet. PK is a concern. LBs are better than most thought.
Yeah, the term "Garbage team" is arbitrary. Most years I would have probably agreed that ISU might be a garbage team, but when they are picked to beat us, then I guess the people calling them garbage also assume we're garbage. LOLAnd you generally schedule teams a few years in advance, so you don’t always know what kind team you are getting other than the name.
Look at Florida State. I’m sure teams thought they were scheduling a solid top 10 team, but they have been garbage this year.
Not sure what we have learned so far. Our guards are not good yet. PK is a concern. LBs are better than most thought.
That's not correct, actually.This is correct. Twice actually.
Yes on Missouri and Pitt. Hell no on ISU. They could donate their cut of the BIG monies to the remaining teams every year, and I still wouldn't want them in. No upside for Iowa there.I wouldn't mind the Big Ten going to 16 teams, then stop. Two schools that make sense geographically. Like Pittsburgh or Missouri, maybe do I dare say Iowa State.
I wouldn't mind the Big Ten going to 16 teams, then stop. Two schools that make sense geographically. Like Pittsburgh or Missouri, maybe do I dare say Iowa State.
Yep, that is pretty much what the clueless on this board thinks.Ok, so everyone outside the top 25 is garbage.......Got it......![]()
I wouldn't mind the Big Ten going to 16 teams, then stop. Two schools that make sense geographically. Like Pittsburgh or Missouri, maybe do I dare say Iowa State.
And I am ashamed that I was sucked into spending even 3 minutes reading through it.More like this is a garbage thread![]()
That's not correct, actually.