That was a spectacular pick by Micah. The Packer OLine actually looked worse against the Vikings than our's was against Stanford. Hard to believe but true.Was just goin to post about Hyde's interception. Never seen a catch like it.
You seriously couldn't figure that out yourself????How many former Iowa players are starting in this game?
I think ( hope ) the Packers threw the game so they can open in Washington against the Washington Red Inks. ( the PC version of the Redskins )
Nope. Unfortunately the Packers are not a good football team.....for a myriad of reasons. The Redskins are going to scalp them.I think ( hope ) the Packers threw the game so they can open in Washington against the Washington Red Inks. ( the PC version of the Redskins )
I have to admit the Viqueens are a lot tougher when the child beater suits up.The arrogance of GB fans knows no bounds. Skol Vikings North Champs!
I have to admit the Viqueens are a lot tougher when the child beater suits up.
.You seriously couldn't figure that out yourself????
well it wouldn't take a whole lot of brains to figure out ... so save yourself a post the next time.
I just wanted to see if you knew.
I really don't know how you equate this to what he said. No one complained about not getting beat fair and square, he said Minnesota is tougher when AP (a child beater) suits up. Is he wrong on any account?Typical classless GB fan. First they can't they admit they were beaten on the field fair and square next they go for attacks having nothing to do with the game. I know a few good GB fans but most are dirt bags who can't handle losing.
I really don't know how you equate this to what he said. No one complained about not getting beat fair and square, he said Minnesota is tougher when AP (a child beater) suits up. Is he wrong on any account?
First stone appeared to be tossed at 4:45 CDT.
Meh no point in playing the same team 3 times in one season. Not to mention now Green Bay and their fans can't take any kind of solace in their season over Minnesota's. Vikings are division Champs and more than likely Green Bay will not advance any farther than the divisional round anyway. So there's nothing they can hold over the Vikings' heads.If I was Minnesota I think I would have preferred to lose last night. I think is rather go back to GB than play Seattle at home.
You seriously couldn't figure that out yourself????
The Packers lost to all 3 Division Foes at Home. That is why the Minnesota Vikings are the 2015 Division Champs.I think ( hope ) the Packers threw the game so they can open in Washington against the Washington Red Inks. ( the PC version of the Redskins )
one more thing james, if you are deeply offended by nfl athletes behavior off the field and their wrap sheets, then you better find another sport to watch, Maybe lacrosse or tennis?
If you meant " rap sheet ", then no I'm not offended. I expect criminal behavior from pro players. If you meant " wrap sheet " then I'd be offended that these guys think they're too good to wrap their own Christmas presents.
![]()
Championships before Super Bowl I don't mean much when there were like 12 teams in the league.
The Viqueens were one of the 14 since 1961, so the Pack have 7 WC's while going head to head in the same division. I guess the other 6 WC could be considered a bonus. Meanwhile the Dycheings have scored a grand total of 34 points combined in their 4 Super Bowl losses.
Do World Series baseball titles before divisional play still count? Yankees need to know.
Typically when you directly compare two items you use the same denominator. So if you're comparing the Yankees to say the Rockies you don't look at time that fell outside of a direct comparison.
The Fudge Packers were largely the laughing stock of the NFL throughout the seventies and eighties. They were fortunate enough to hit on Favre and Rodgers. Rogers is fading now and Green Bay is worthless without him as we witnessed when they've used their backups. Teams recently have also figured out how to play Rodgers and he has been very mediocre in the 2nd half. The Vikings like other teams that have been successful against him have learned if you press the receivers Rodgers is terrible. That was the stark contrast between the first and second game where the Vikings altered their defense to play a press two deep safety.
Congratulations on you WW2 super bowls although I doubt you were there to witness. Too bad the future doesn't look too bright with a lot of aging players.
" Too bad the future doesn't look too bright with a lot of aging players. "
Facts can be you friends if you happen to know them, which apparently you're not too familiar with. Vikings are older than the Packers. Packers trending younger, Vikings trending older.
![]()
Packers typically stay a very young team. That will continue with our GM. Not worried about Rodgers being 32 and I would guess Peppers plays one, maybe two more years.Nice gross stats but it helps to put those into context:
Look at the Vikings star players. They are predominantly young players.
Anthony Barr: 23 (PFF's #1 4/3 OLB)
Harrison Smith : 26 (PFF's #2 Safety)
Everson Griffen: 28 (team sack leader)
Stefon Diggs: 22 (team leading receiver as rookie)
Eric Kendricks: 23 (leading tackler as a rookie)
Teddy Bridgewater: 23
Linval Joseph: 27 (PFF's #4 DT)
Shariff Floyd: 24
Xavier Rhodes: 24
The only players considered a star over the age of 28 for the Vikings would be Peterson (30) and Berger (33).
GB star players over 30 to start next season:
Peppers: 35
Matthews: 29
Sitton: 29
Rodgers: 32
Nelson (IR): 30
Throwing out gross stats doesn't mean much when it's inflated by part-time players like Greenway and backup QBs like Shaun Hill. Green Bay has more key players over the age of 28.
So Rodgers has a down year, due to receivers who can't get separation, a line that can't block, and a mediocre running game, and all of a sudden he's "fading?"Typically when you directly compare two items you use the same denominator. So if you're comparing the Yankees to say the Rockies you don't look at time that fell outside of a direct comparison.
The Fudge Packers were largely the laughing stock of the NFL throughout the seventies and eighties. They were fortunate enough to hit on Favre and Rodgers. Rogers is fading now and Green Bay is worthless without him as we witnessed when they've used their backups. Teams recently have also figured out how to play Rodgers and he has been very mediocre in the 2nd half. The Vikings like other teams that have been successful against him have learned if you press the receivers Rodgers is terrible. That was the stark contrast between the first and second game where the Vikings altered their defense to play a press two deep safety.
Congratulations on you WW2 super bowls although I doubt you were there to witness. Too bad the future doesn't look too bright with a lot of aging players.
Typically when you directly compare two items you use the same denominator. So if you're comparing the Yankees to say the Rockies you don't look at time that fell outside of a direct comparison.
The Fudge Packers were largely the laughing stock of the NFL throughout the seventies and eighties. They were fortunate enough to hit on Favre and Rodgers. Rogers is fading now and Green Bay is worthless without him as we witnessed when they've used their backups. Teams recently have also figured out how to play Rodgers and he has been very mediocre in the 2nd half. The Vikings like other teams that have been successful against him have learned if you press the receivers Rodgers is terrible. That was the stark contrast between the first and second game where the Vikings altered their defense to play a press two deep safety.
Congratulations on you WW2 super bowls although I doubt you were there to witness. Too bad the future doesn't look too bright with a lot of aging players.
Greenway part time? No.