ADVERTISEMENT

Paige vs Caitlin

the mens side is not the same as women. The are more great players and the talent level is high overall.
The womens game: There is nowhere near the talent pool and they tend to congregate at a few school, which is why predicting the final four and champion is/has been pretty easy.

So you say that all the top womens talent ends up a handful of schools, yet refuse to consider a player from those schools to be in the conversation for the greatest ever?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZachJump
400,000 high school girls playing basketball versus 524,000 boys is not some overly significant difference in the talent pool.

Easy to agree that there is more parity in the men’s game, just looking at the Naismith it is more likely someone not ranked in the top 50 wins than a Cooper Flagg.
Total numbers don't tell the story. There is a much, much larger disparity in the women's game vs the men's. Many more of the 524k male players have similar/higher talent in comparison to the 400k females.

This is exhibited in the scores of the NCAA tournament games where women's teams are losing by 50+ points on the regular.
 
So you say that all the top womens talent ends up a handful of schools, yet refuse to consider a player from those schools to be in the conversation for the greatest ever?
I don't think there's any question that if Caitlin were at UConn, they would have won four titles going away.

Yet, there was little old Iowa beating the great program with Paige last year on the biggest stage.
 
400,000 high school girls playing basketball versus 524,000 boys is not some overly significant difference in the talent pool.

Easy to agree that there is more parity in the men’s game, just looking at the Naismith it is more likely someone not ranked in the top 50 wins than a Cooper Flagg.
I don't have a dog in the "fight" here, but that's 31%! That's significant in my world.
 
I don't think there's any question that if Caitlin were at UConn, they would have won four titles going away.

Yet, there was little old Iowa beating the great program with Paige last year on the biggest stage.

Didn't they do that with Brenna Stewart? Had Clark gone to UCONN her individual stats wouldn't be near what they were at Iowa though, just my opinion.
 
This. Ole Jim wins my “Write an Article Saying You Don’t Know a Thing About Caitlin Clark Without Saying You Don’t Know a Thing About Caitlin Clark” award, hands down.

If he had really been serious, he could have saved a ton of effort and just followed up his headline “Why Was Caitlin Clark a Bigger Deal in College than Paige Bueckers?” quite simply with:

1. Clark was more spectacular.

End of story.

Any further explanation necessary would really just be elaboration on point number one above.

Ten year old girls (as well as grown freaking men) would line up virtually anywhere/anytime with programs, t-shirts, shoes in hand for her autograph because CC would scream on the court?

Rural Midwesterners waited for hours outside arenas in Evanston, Madison, and Lincoln because all of a sudden they realized how great women’s college basketball was?

You are going to seriously contrast Paige’s 0.8 blocks per game with CC’s 0.5 as part of your analysis into this “conundrum” and you’re going to keep a straight face in doing it?

Boy, do I feel like a fool now after spending all that time watching Caitlin and her career 46% FG percentage when I could have been watching Paige and her 52%.

GMAFB
This!

But even the one Souhan got right, Caitlin being more spectacular, he got wrong! While earlier he noted Caitlin had more assists, he didn't so much as mention Caitlin's passing as to why she was so spectacular. Effortlessly flicking three quarter court passes is not normal!

Quite spectacular too is the pace of play by Caitlin. There's a reason why in the WNBA rookie CC was guarded full-court on day one. Coming out of college everyone knew Caitlin was gonna flat out bust it.

His other reasons, as you and others have mentioned, are quite ridiculous too. No one was surprised by the quality of the women's game. We were in fact quite frustrated with it when Caitlin's teammates fumbled her deft passes or missed layup. Nevertheless, Caitlin ofc was able to elevate her entire team and carried them to two Championship games. THAT was the pleasant and exhilarating surprise.

With the controversial thing you could easily say that hurt her as much as it helped her. Come tournament time in '24 I think a lot of folks, and even Caitlin's dad, were expressing she needed to cool it a little.

The white rural fan thing is so incomplete as to be totally inaccurate. Caitlin had international fans in college! Plus all the unprecedented NIL stuff, totally unique.

Well, at least he got the stats right. Presumably.
 
Didn't they do that with Brenna Stewart? Had Clark gone to UCONN her individual stats wouldn't be near what they were at Iowa though, just my opinion.
Agree to a point. Caitlin's scoring numbers would probably be considerably lower, but I wouldn't be surprised if her assist numbers were much higher with the talent she had to pass to.

I also consider Breanna to be a lot better player than Paige.
 
Total numbers don't tell the story. There is a much, much larger disparity in the women's game vs the men's. Many more of the 524k male players have similar/higher talent in comparison to the 400k females.

This is exhibited in the scores of the NCAA tournament games where women's teams are losing by 50+ points on the regular.

Thank you for rewording the second part of my post you responded to.


Easy to agree that there is more parity in the men’s game, just looking at the Naismith it is more likely someone not ranked in the top 50 wins than a Cooper Flagg.
 
I don't have a dog in the "fight" here, but that's 31%! That's significant in my world.


That to some extent I can agree with.

I think for many they are used to men playing and since most D1 starters of women are not going to beat a high school boy starter…they just go to where the women are not as good.

Outside of the top 20 coming out of high school, they are comparatively good as the men.

But so many will still keep posting things like why does women basketball players always miss layups and such…and ignore there is a bit of a difference making a layup in traffic when you are 5’10 guard who’s release on the layup is a foot below the rim compared to 6’4 guard that’s release on the layup is above the rim.
 
Outside of the top 20 coming out of high school, they are comparatively good as the men.
This couldn't be more incorrect.

The men's talent pool is so much deeper than the women's.

Another case in point. How many male D2 players are transferring up to D1 and will have success for their new programs?

Now, how many D2 women's players are transferring up to D1? Not very many.
 
This couldn't be more incorrect.

The men's talent pool is so much deeper than the women's.

Another case in point. How many male D2 players are transferring up to D1 and will have success for their new programs?

Now, how many D2 women's players are transferring up to D1? Not very many.

There will be some D2 transfers up in both, not many of which for either are going to be stars. It happens…ie our new men’s point guard….but I have not seen any D2 players being ranked in anyone’s top transfer lists, men or women.
 
Wait.... is she shooting in that photo on the right?

She needs more than just a LAB to fix that shot. Might be the worst shooting form you'll see.

Side note... The "back in the lab" saying is so dumb.

Bill Cartwright, Jamaal Wilkes and Bill Walton would argue their shooting form is worse.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
The flashiness of Caitlin's passes and logo bombs were part of it, combined with her getting IOWA to the finals 2 years in a row. Iowa was/is good, but nowhere near a final 4 team without her. But at the end of the day, you don't need to look further than this chart:
GKuguOMWkAEd5Ih
Pretty simple answer.

Caitlin’s bomb half court 3’s, CC’s insane passes, her unreal scoring, rebounding, blocked shots, steals, & lightning quick speed & ballhandling!

Other than Clark being better than her in everything possible in the game of basketball, it’s a very fair question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiderland
Or Joakim Noah , Shawn Marion or a dozen or so other NBA players with worse form than Angel.
Are we talking about them compared to their competition or them actually being worse than a player who literally misses layups so frequently it looks like she's padding her stats, moses malone style?
 
Are we talking about them compared to their competition or them actually being worse than a player who literally misses layups so frequently it looks like she's padding her stats, moses malone style?

I was referring to their shooting form outside of 5 feet.

That being said, if you make it consistently it really doesn’t matter what your form looks like
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT