Our 2017 class was Luka, Connor, and Nunge.
Our 2018 class was Joe and CJ
Our 2019 class was JT and Pat.
According to Rivals, that's 4 four stars and 3 three stars, and most of what is making up of a top five team? Thinking that is "worse" than middle of the pack is just plain stupid. Take a break peep.
lol
2017
9th in B1G 57th nationally
2018
12th in B1G 67th nationally
2019
11th in B1G 72d nationally
2020
9th in B1G 55th nationally
2021 We're currently a lock for a 3 star 150+ recruit -- that's it.
Math doesn't seem to be your strong suit so let me break it down for you -- that's an average of a little worse than 10th in the B1G and 63d nationally (it will go down when this class is done).
That is the
very definition of worse than middle of the pack. You seem to think that because you believe e.g., JT and Pat are better than middle of the pack recruits, that it makes it so. The only reason you think these players are above average is because you don't who who anyone else is recruiting.
Now.... there's no question that Iowa has a pretty damn good team right now but let's be real -- if Garza doesn't way, way,
WAY outperform his 120 ranking last year, what are you looking at? You're looking at an average team (at best) in the league and likely below average. Hell....we finished 5th with a national player of the year candidate on the roster. Even with Garza taking on the role of super hero, we won one more league game than we did the year before.
Players like Garza -- a guy who by sheer force of will makes himself into a phenom -- happen about once a generation.
That's all I'm saying. The '19, '20, '21 classes don't bode well for the future unless you're depending on extreme outlier development to happen every other class or so.
I don't think that's realistic.
...and that's why I'm planning on enjoying every minute of this season. I think it drops off after this. Hope I'm wrong.