Looks like he will be looking for a job after this season. Who would sign the petition to bring him back and replace GD?
Bingo - if Davis retires.Umm.... How about GD retires and Philbin steps in as OC?
Bingo - if Davis retires.
You are right. Why would you want an a guy who won a super bowl as OC? My bad.Nope, BF as OC and Philbin can come back as Oline coach, KOK QB coach.
Is this a serious thread? I swear 5 years after GD leaves some fans will want him back. KOK was routinely roasted on this board! The only think that has changed is that we may have found someone worse.
Of course, I know ... KOK was an offensive genius and KF kept him under wraps. Bull.
Remember this when you mock that 'KF kept him under wraps,' KOK wanted to start Stanzi but KF kept forcing him to play Christensen. We all know how that panned out...
Anyone bitching about our offense this year is a freaking retard and should never, ever, EVER be allowed to watch Iowa play football, ever again.
You can blather on about not being able to block one guy and all that, but if you bring protection over to help on Schobert, someone else get's exposed. So, it's a walk-on terrorizing you, or it's a guy with better physical attributes doing it.
Since I'm apparently just "blathering" anyway, I'll just go ahead and ask you what your rambling, nonsense sentence means. Seriously, if we leave a running back in to block, to just slow Schobert down on his way to crushing Beathard, how does this "expose" anyone, exactly? But I guess I'm just blathering again.
Well, what exactly was Iowa supposed to do to cover Schobert then? They're running some defenses Iowa hasn't seen prior, they don't have a solution within the gameplan, they'd then be running stuff they hadn't practiced all week.
Also, I listened to the game on radio, Wisconsin's broadcast. Throughout the entire game, their color guy was raving about Canzeri's pass blocking. Which to me means that Iowa indeed was keeping their RB's in on pass protection (removing a potential target in the process - a target already missing their best WR all game).
Why can't it be that Wisconsin's just simply pretty good on defense? That it HAS to be bad play-calling, bad in-game adjustments - and it cannot possibly be that Schobert is pretty good? Do you honestly expect me to believe that Iowa at no point during the game though to themselves...gee, maybe we need to block that guy...and then decided NOT TO TRY?
Schobert leas the NATION in TFL's and sacks, and is tied in forced fumbles. The Nation.
Read the attached article..."As seen in the Hawaii game, a running back cannot contain No. 58."
http://www.buckys5thquarter.com/2015/10/5/9449985/wisconsin-football-iowa-joe-schobert-film-study
The DE on the other side was all conference player last year so sliding protection that way allows the other DE to make plays too. Iowa was playing without starting RB, by far best WR, best TE, and starting left. Tackle so there is that. QB starting only his 6th game so there is that. And our wrs tes not getting separation doesn't help (smith and Duzey would have helped) and oh yeah Wisconsin is pretty damn good tooSince I'm apparently just "blathering" anyway, I'll just go ahead and ask you what your rambling, nonsense sentence means. Seriously, if we leave a running back in to block, to just slow Schobert down on his way to crushing Beathard, how does this "expose" anyone, exactly? But I guess I'm just blathering again.
why not just enjoy the here and now? philbin was always one of my favorites thoughLots of bunched up panties in this thread. Iowa's old OC is going to be looking for a job at the end of the season. It was pretty common knowledge that when GD was hired he wouldn't be here too long. Why not have a little fun with a hypothetical situation? Good grief.
Looks like he will be looking for a job after this season. Who would sign the petition to bring him back and replace GD?