If it wasn't sealed 100% she has some explaining to do and probably charged. There's no reason to open a sealed bottle.Aka she fudged up.
What she should have done was admitted to it. And pointed to blood alcohol content tests and why she pulled him over. Giving multiple explanations for why she opened it. Looks as if you’re trying to find the truth or hiding something. You’re opening the jury up to questioning all of the evidence provided by the police.If it wasn't sealed 100% she has some explaining to do and probably charged. There's no reason to open a sealed bottle.
FactsNope.
Cops have abused power for decades and when things got to court, where it was always their word vs defendants.
Cell phones and camera evidence became law enforcement's worst enemy.