No they don't. Lots of private groups exclude and discriminate and are flourishing.
Not if they're "open to the public".... even the HBCs don't require you to be black to go there.
No they don't. Lots of private groups exclude and discriminate and are flourishing.
Private clubs aren't open to the public. If they are open to the public they aren't private clubs. This school isn't open to the public. Look how big government you cons are over little hats.Not if they're "open to the public".... even the HBCs don't require you to be black to go there.
No they don't. Lots of private groups exclude and discriminate and are flourishing.
Yes, BLM is free to be racist. So are you. The public library isn't. That perfectly illustrates the point.Kind of like these racist oppressors?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/22/black-lives-matter-slams-public-librarys-racist-ba/
Private clubs aren't open to the public. If they are open to the public they aren't private clubs. This school isn't open to the public. Look how big government you cons are over little hats.
Says the poster who uses labels like SJW.Liberals should seriously worry about the influence the SJW's have among them. It is only going to continue to grow.
They are also free to be disliked and disregarded. Just like their KKK counterparts.Yes, BLM is free to be racist. So are you. The public library isn't. That perfectly illustrates the point.
Are you sure about that?Wingers like Fran live in a continual state of paranoiac delusion fostered by the brainwashing effects of living in the wingnut echo chamber of hatred and lies to the exclusion of realistic sources of information. They're continually conditioned into a victim mentality. Fortunately, there is a cure. A few weeks or months away from the chamber oftentimes leads to a return to sanity and reality. Of course, the first, and most difficult, step is for them to admit they have a problem and to seek the help they so desperately need.
I'm late to this, um, fiesta. Have now scanned the thread - except for the comments from the worst idiots.My point is that yes, I think that political correctness has gone too far when wearing a sombrero at a tequila party gets someone in trouble, and that kids can't play dodgeball on the playground. But to swing the pendulum so far back the other way that the answer is Donald Trump? Can't we find somewhere in the middle where we agree that not everything is offensive, while also not deliberately trying to offend?
Blathering anything that comes to mind before thinking about it isn't what I think of when I think about free speech. And Trump sues anyone that says anything bad about him. He's on record saying how much he enjoys suing people for libel, even when what they're saying is 100% true.
This post seemed to get ignored and probably because it completely shuts down the notion that Trump is the answer to the "PC problem" this country is facing.
Being a loudmouth biggot is not an appropriate response to "PC".
What happens when we run out of safe spaces?