It’s not nice to call people a sunt.a better name for her channel might be raging feminazi "see you next tuesday"
It’s not nice to call people a sunt.a better name for her channel might be raging feminazi "see you next tuesday"
She is what is known as a mental midget, a shrew, a nasty bitch.She’s brilliant. You’re probably fapping to her as I type this.
He's a teacherOne other question. How do you have time during work to find and post this kind of stuff?
I have a pretty good idea which direction you’re headed. But Politics Girl didn’t merely say she doesn’t trust Republicans not to ban contraception and gay sex and any sex outside of marriage. She explicitly claimed that there are mainstream Republican representatives who have stated they want to outlaw all three of those things.
Can you or Tommy or anyone else in this thread provide even one example that supports those claims?
Clearly more intelligent than you. She doesn’t ignore what MAGAS are telling us. You put your head in the sand. How is she wrong. What is she saying that’s false. I mean you’re acting like you don’t listen MTG and Boebert speak. They’re the smart women, right?She is what is known as a mental midget, a shrew, a nasty bitch.
They are idiots too. Can’t believe they hold office.Clearly more intelligent than you. She doesn’t ignore what MAGAS are telling us. You put your head in the sand. How is she wrong. What is she saying that’s false. I mean you’re acting like you don’t listen MTG and Boebert speak. They’re the smart women, right?
So you’re telling me, if it comes up for a vote, Ernst is going to break away from the Cons and vote pro contraception? You think they won’t vote against gay marriage? Your serious?Lol. “Really easy,” and yet you failed to provide even one example that answers any of the three criteria.
Ernst isn’t trying to outlaw contraception. She blocked a specific bill sponsored by Ed Markey because she is instead supporting her own bill that makes it easier for women to get birth control pills without a prescription. So clearly she’s not trying to outlaw it. Name one representative who wants to outlaw condoms or other forms of contraception.
You pointed out that Ted Cruz wants to ban gay marriage, but that wasn’t the question. Name one representative who wants to outlaw gay sex.
And you didn’t even try to come up with an example of someone wanting to outlaw sex outside of marriage.
You’re 0-for-3, Tommy. Get back in the batter’s box and see if you can at least make contact this time.
Aaannnd you still don't get it. The point here isn't whether or not Republicans can be trusted not to do these things. Politics Girl very specifically declared that mainstream Republican representatives have stated their intention to do so.I'm telling you things are outlawed or reversed by people even when they say they won't. These people should not be trusted and eff any evidence or lack thereof. The entire electorate is not that stupid.
Name one mainstream Republican representative who has publicly suggested that contraception should be outlawed, as Politics Girl very specifically insisted.So you’re telling me, if it comes up for a vote, Ernst is going to break away from the Cons and vote pro contraception?
Jesus, Tom, try to focus. Yes, there are Republicans who want to ban gay marriage. But that's not the issue I'm asking about. Politics Girl very specifically stated there are Republicans who want to outlaw gay sex, not merely gay marriage. Can you name any of them?You think they won’t vote against gay marriage? Your serious?
Aaannnd you still don't get it. The point here isn't whether or not Republicans can be trusted not to do these things. Politics Girl very specifically declared that mainstream Republican representatives have stated their intention to do so.
Let's go to the transcript, shall we?
'Sadly, you need to think about these questions because Republicans are coming after sex. This new control they're asserting? The one that says you can't have an abortion? It's coming after contraception next. And gay marriage, and gay sex, and sex outside of marriage and pregnancy. We have representatives out here suggesting birth control should be illegal, that condoms should be banned. That sex is only for a married man and woman, and that sex should come with the accepted outcome of a child. Everything else is outlawed. And these aren't outlier politicians. These are mainstream Republicans coming after the legality of premarital sex, and queer sex, and sex for pleasure."
So once again I ask you, can you name even one mainstream Republican representative who has suggested that condoms or other forms of contraception should be outlawed, or that gay sex should be outlawed, or that sex outside of marriage should be outlawed?
Those are pretty damn close. Way to nitpick.You pointed out that Ted Cruz wants to ban gay marriage, but that wasn’t the question. Name one representative who wants to outlaw gay sex.
She is literally the subject of this thread. Tom Paris said she's spot on, I disputed three of her claims, and then you attacked me for being on topic. Well done, you.I don't give a f!ck about that stupid b!tch. Sorry. Don't care.
Distinguishing between gay marriage and gay sex is nitpicking?Those are pretty damn close. Way to nitpick.
I see your point. I don’t limit my exploits with @TheonGreyJoy wife to the bedroom. She’s often down to get down in many places.Why does she think sex should be limited to the bedroom?
She is literally the subject of this thread. Tom Paris said she's spot on, I disputed three of her claims, and then you attacked me for being on topic. Well done, you.
I guarantee I’m better at my jobs than you have ever been. Our moderator would agree. If I was a Republican you wouldn’t say one damn word to me and you know it. I do an incredible job working with children. Teaching. Coaching. I’m beloved and am told so. If you saw me with kids of all ages you would shut up about it. My students would laugh at you and goldie. It’s really sad that your ilk has been brainwashed to attack teachers. Every single time it comes from a MAGA. Every time. I don’t owe you any other explanation.Tom, as a teacher, we as the public, we as the taxpayer, have entrusted you with our children. We entrust you to educate and engage. Do you feel like you are providing a quality education when your attention is focused on posting videos like this during the school day?
Your head is in the sand. You probably believed they meant abortion should be left to the states. The evangelical far right has control of a party. They will not stop pushing their fake Christian beliefs on the rest of us. It’s not hidden. It’s obvious. You can play your little games. It doesn’t change the fact your party is moving so far right people like Cheney are jumping ship. That means NOTHING to you? The former head of the RNC thinks you’re all nuts. He’s right.She is literally the subject of this thread. Tom Paris said she's spot on, I disputed three of her claims, and then you attacked me for being on topic. Well done, you.
I guarantee I’m better at my jobs than you have ever been. Our moderator would agree. If I was a Republican you wouldn’t say one damn word to me and you know it. I do an incredible job working with children. Teaching. Coaching. I’m beloved and am told so. If you saw me with kids of all ages you would shut up about it. My students would laugh at you and goldie. It’s really sad that your ilk has been brainwashed to attack teachers. Every single time it comes from a MAGA. Every time. I don’t owe you any other explanation.
I will accept this post as tacit admission on your part that three (3) of her claims were total bullshit.Your head is in the sand. You probably believed they meant abortion should be left to the states. The evangelical far right has control of a party. They will not stop pushing their fake Christian beliefs on the rest of us. It’s not hidden. It’s obvious. You can play your little games. It doesn’t change the fact your party is moving so far right people like Cheney are jumping ship. That means NOTHING to you? The former head of the RNC thinks you’re all nuts. He’s right.
I don’t know Ernst’s specific reason(s) for blocking that specific bill. But if I had to guess, it probably has to do with emergency contraception such as Plan B. If SCOTUS were to overturn Griswold v Connecticut and Eisenstadt v Baird, I have no doubt that some red states would ban Plan B.Clarence Thomas basically said that they should look at overturning the right to contraception and gay marriage. The only speech that matters from congress is their vote which was almost unanimously no for protecting contraceptives. And don’t give us some bullshit about Joni Ernst only voting no because she wanted more access. They are 2 different issues and her bill could be passed along with the bill guaranteeing a right to contraception.
From the article I read “ But Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst blocked their efforts by objecting to Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Ed Markey’s request for unanimous consent to pass the bill, saying the measure went too far. “
What do you suppose she meant by saying it went too far? She clearly believes it’s okay for states to ban it.
Yeah Tom, this guy wants at least three more pages out of this one.@Tom Paris do you have any intentions at all of providing any quotes or any links or any evidence at all to back up your three bullshit claims? Or are you just going to keep posting laughing emojis and wasting time? Because so far you’ve done absolutely nothing to back up the claim that Republicans have stated their intentions to 1) outlaw condoms and all forms of contraception, 2) outlaw gay sex, and 3) outlaw all forms of sex outside of heterosexual marriage.
I’d settle for just one example that proves he’s not a blatant liar.Yeah Tom, this guy wants at least three more pages out of this one.
Well. I guess that would solve it, then.I’d settle for just one example that proves he’s not a blatant liar.
This thread could go 20 pages and Tommy still won’t have a single shred of evidence to back up those claims. He knows he got caught in a full-blown lie so now he’s just counting on his buddies to bail him out with ad hominem attacks.Well. I guess that would solve it, then.
Meanwhile, you crawl the pages. Bold strategy.This thread could go 20 pages and Tommy still won’t have a single shred of evidence to back up those claims. He knows he got caught in a full-blown lie so now he’s just counting on his buddies to bail him out with ad hominem attacks.