ADVERTISEMENT

Poll: Is this guy a perv, or doing what any red-blooded male would do?

Is the letter writer below a creepy perv or just a regular dude doing dude things?

  • Yes - creepy and pervy and an invader of privacy

    Votes: 12 21.1%
  • No - if they didn't want to be seen, they could shut the shades and this dude is in the clear

    Votes: 45 78.9%

  • Total voters
    57

torbee

HB King
Gold Member
Dear How to Do It,

Six months ago, my wife and I moved into a high-rise in a major metropolitan area that has a balcony with a very good view that happens to include two nearby luxury hotels. As anyone knows, luxury hotels play host to all varieties of amorous activities—but weve been surprised the extent to which participants in these activities proceed without closing the curtains. On almost any given night, our balcony provides us box seats to whatever is going on in these hotels. Initially, my wife and I dismissed this as a humorous side effect of moving into a high rise. But more recently, its become a point of contention. My wife thinks that the only appropriate response to seeing action in these hotels is to laugh it off and ignore it. I have a bit of a voyeuristic streak and will watch if presented with something that turns me on.
Ill even admit to occasionally breaking out the binoculars. My (probably self-serving) justification for feeling okay about doing this is that these people are well-aware of the fact that theyre in a high rise in full view of several buildings where people may see them. My wife, however, thinks that anything beyond incidental sightings is an invasion of privacy.

So, my question for you is whether Im creepy and should turn away? Or is it acceptable for my eyes to linger, since these people must be aware of their exhibitionism??

— Vexed Voyeur

Dear Vexed Voyeur,

I agree with you on one point: Your rationale is probably self-serving. Further, your justification depends on an assumption that is anything but proven. It’s certainly possible that some people are aware of the potential they have to be seen, and perhaps that’s even part of the thrill for the true exhibitionists. But height and distance can go a long way to making people feel cloistered off, even if they aren’t. These people that you are assuming are completely aware of their potential to be observed may, in turn, assume they’re too far away to be made out and/or that only a true creep would bust out the binoculars.

I think applying your fuzzy reasoning to another scenario might be useful: Someone may leave their front door open, fully aware that a person could walk in. This, however, is not an invitation, and if someone did walk in, it would constitute an unlawful entry and extremely questionable behavior on their part. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.

The ethics of voyeurism remain a subject of debate, and simply viewing what makes itself available to you is largely legal. A person could hardly be faulted if arousal follows. I’d draw the creepy line is where effort must be put into seeing more, especially when those who are being watched could very plausibly be unaware. If the person who lives in a building next to you by a few feet is consistently showing their bare ass and has quite obviously looked back at you, you can assume that person is aware of what they’re doing and is, in fact, offering a show. The same can’t be said for people in a hotel with enough distance between you that you require binoculars. I’m with your wife on this one. I don’t think seeking out this kind of entertainment makes you a bad person, but since you asked whether or not it’s creepy, I’m obligated to confirm.
 
I agree with you on one point: Your rationale is probably self-serving.

ComplexGregariousAtlasmoth-max-1mb.gif
 
Dear How to Do It,

Six months ago, my wife and I moved into a high-rise in a major metropolitan area that has a balcony with a very good view that happens to include two nearby luxury hotels. As anyone knows, luxury hotels play host to all varieties of amorous activities—but weve been surprised the extent to which participants in these activities proceed without closing the curtains. On almost any given night, our balcony provides us box seats to whatever is going on in these hotels. Initially, my wife and I dismissed this as a humorous side effect of moving into a high rise. But more recently, its become a point of contention. My wife thinks that the only appropriate response to seeing action in these hotels is to laugh it off and ignore it. I have a bit of a voyeuristic streak and will watch if presented with something that turns me on.
Ill even admit to occasionally breaking out the binoculars. My (probably self-serving) justification for feeling okay about doing this is that these people are well-aware of the fact that theyre in a high rise in full view of several buildings where people may see them. My wife, however, thinks that anything beyond incidental sightings is an invasion of privacy.

So, my question for you is whether Im creepy and should turn away? Or is it acceptable for my eyes to linger, since these people must be aware of their exhibitionism??

— Vexed Voyeur

Dear Vexed Voyeur,

I agree with you on one point: Your rationale is probably self-serving. Further, your justification depends on an assumption that is anything but proven. It’s certainly possible that some people are aware of the potential they have to be seen, and perhaps that’s even part of the thrill for the true exhibitionists. But height and distance can go a long way to making people feel cloistered off, even if they aren’t. These people that you are assuming are completely aware of their potential to be observed may, in turn, assume they’re too far away to be made out and/or that only a true creep would bust out the binoculars.

I think applying your fuzzy reasoning to another scenario might be useful: Someone may leave their front door open, fully aware that a person could walk in. This, however, is not an invitation, and if someone did walk in, it would constitute an unlawful entry and extremely questionable behavior on their part. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.

The ethics of voyeurism remain a subject of debate, and simply viewing what makes itself available to you is largely legal. A person could hardly be faulted if arousal follows. I’d draw the creepy line is where effort must be put into seeing more, especially when those who are being watched could very plausibly be unaware. If the person who lives in a building next to you by a few feet is consistently showing their bare ass and has quite obviously looked back at you, you can assume that person is aware of what they’re doing and is, in fact, offering a show. The same can’t be said for people in a hotel with enough distance between you that you require binoculars. I’m with your wife on this one. I don’t think seeking out this kind of entertainment makes you a bad person, but since you asked whether or not it’s creepy, I’m obligated to confirm.
They should refer him to Prime to watch the recent movie The Voyeurs. That will help on two fronts. First, it's better fapping material, as Sydney Sweeney is smoking hot and rewind/pause is available. Second, its morality tale will make him re-think whether it's a good idea to be a voyeur.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: redbirdhawk
If you’re creeping out someone’s house or going out of your way to view them specifically then that’s weird.

If you are in your own living space and they make no effort to conceal themselves then have at it.
 
Dear How to Do It,

Six months ago, my wife and I moved into a high-rise in a major metropolitan area that has a balcony with a very good view that happens to include two nearby luxury hotels. As anyone knows, luxury hotels play host to all varieties of amorous activities—but weve been surprised the extent to which participants in these activities proceed without closing the curtains. On almost any given night, our balcony provides us box seats to whatever is going on in these hotels. Initially, my wife and I dismissed this as a humorous side effect of moving into a high rise. But more recently, its become a point of contention. My wife thinks that the only appropriate response to seeing action in these hotels is to laugh it off and ignore it. I have a bit of a voyeuristic streak and will watch if presented with something that turns me on.
Ill even admit to occasionally breaking out the binoculars. My (probably self-serving) justification for feeling okay about doing this is that these people are well-aware of the fact that theyre in a high rise in full view of several buildings where people may see them. My wife, however, thinks that anything beyond incidental sightings is an invasion of privacy.

So, my question for you is whether Im creepy and should turn away? Or is it acceptable for my eyes to linger, since these people must be aware of their exhibitionism??

— Vexed Voyeur

Dear Vexed Voyeur,

I agree with you on one point: Your rationale is probably self-serving. Further, your justification depends on an assumption that is anything but proven. It’s certainly possible that some people are aware of the potential they have to be seen, and perhaps that’s even part of the thrill for the true exhibitionists. But height and distance can go a long way to making people feel cloistered off, even if they aren’t. These people that you are assuming are completely aware of their potential to be observed may, in turn, assume they’re too far away to be made out and/or that only a true creep would bust out the binoculars.

I think applying your fuzzy reasoning to another scenario might be useful: Someone may leave their front door open, fully aware that a person could walk in. This, however, is not an invitation, and if someone did walk in, it would constitute an unlawful entry and extremely questionable behavior on their part. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.

The ethics of voyeurism remain a subject of debate, and simply viewing what makes itself available to you is largely legal. A person could hardly be faulted if arousal follows. I’d draw the creepy line is where effort must be put into seeing more, especially when those who are being watched could very plausibly be unaware. If the person who lives in a building next to you by a few feet is consistently showing their bare ass and has quite obviously looked back at you, you can assume that person is aware of what they’re doing and is, in fact, offering a show. The same can’t be said for people in a hotel with enough distance between you that you require binoculars. I’m with your wife on this one. I don’t think seeking out this kind of entertainment makes you a bad person, but since you asked whether or not it’s creepy, I’m obligated to confirm.
Torbee there are many problems with your letter.

1) The Mississippi Lofts is not a “high rise”.
2) Davenport is not a “major metropolitan area”.
3) The Current and The Blackhawk are not “luxury hotels”.

Also if you have to ask if you’re a pervert, you already know the answer, don’t you?
 
Sounds like a trap.

If you've ever been to a european beach where going topless is common, you know that 99%of people who choose to go topless...shouldnt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Haha… I was fine with everything until the perv busted out the binoculars.
 
Haha… I was fine with everything until the perv busted out the binoculars.
My FIL had a giant pair of binocs that he kept near the picture window at the lake house. Our place looks out over "party cove" where everyone anchors and swims.

My son and his friends named the binocs the "Titty-Master 5000" 😂

You'd be amazed what women in bikinis do when they think no one is watching. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MuscoHawk
My FIL had a giant pair of binocs that he kept near the picture window at the lake house. Our place looks out over "party cove" where everyone anchors and swims.

My son and his friends named the binocs the "Titty-Master 5000" 😂

You'd be amazed what women in bikinis do when they think no one is watching. ;)
You'd also be amazed at what women in bikinis do when they know people are watching.
 
The best part is my MIL thought he bought the binoculars because he was really interested in observing all the wildlife at the lake.

Which, in a way, I guess he was. But not the way she thought.
Years ago I was in St Pete beach on a condo rooftop to test a cell site and noticed binoculars leaning against an ac unit. Once I looked over the edge down at the beach I realized why. I did not touch the binoculars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
Binoculars make him a creepy perv. Otherwise no. Our loft in San Francisco looked over a rich guys back yard where he had a hot tub.. He would have naked chicks over all the time in the hot tub with him and his buddies. Was always good to get TBW going.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT