Iowa's starting lineup should hopefully be a really good 3 point shooting group:I think the Hawks have a chance to beat that #9 rating.
In the last few years, they had a star - Garza and the Murray's. I imagine that there was a fair amount of deferring to the star on the floor. Shouldn't be any of that this year.
Also in the last few years, Iowa had some guys on the court that were not "complete" players, namely JBo, CMac and Ulis. I think there is a good chance the Hawks will have 5 guys on the floor most of the time that have more of a complete skill set. Not stars, but maybe fewer big gaps in skill set.
Rebounding should improve. Defense? IDK - fingers crossed.
Shooting? Same as always - sometimes good, sometimes not so good.
Last year the Hawks were 24-5 when shooting +40% from the floor. 19-2 when shooting 44.4% or better.
They were 21-4 when shooting +30% from 3.
I'm ready to see this team in action.
Agree, The thing about Krikke, or whoever if playing the 5, is that they don't have to rotate up to the top of the key. Stay around the paint where someone will have to guard him.Iowa's starting lineup should hopefully be a really good 3 point shooting group:
Perkins 33%
Dix 40%
Patrick 34%
Payton 34%
And Payton's shooting percentage will hopefully be better this season as he had that massive slump at the start of last year. I've been pleasantly surprised in my rewatch of last year just how often TP hit 3s when he had defenders sag on him. If he can maintain that and be someone that defenses have to at least respect, that will help a ton with spacing. And of course the X factor here will be Krikke--he didn't shoot a great percentage last season (27%) but it sounds like this has been a point of emphasis this offseason for him. Would be fun if he and Tony could have a pick n pop game with 3 other lethal shooters to kick to if the defense starts to switch/help.
#7. Should be ahead of Northwestern and Wisconsin.I think the Hawks have a chance to beat that #9 rating.
In the last few years, they had a star - Garza and the Murray's. I imagine that there was a fair amount of deferring to the star on the floor. Shouldn't be any of that this year.
Also in the last few years, Iowa had some guys on the court that were not "complete" players, namely JBo, CMac and Ulis. I think there is a good chance the Hawks will have 5 guys on the floor most of the time that have more of a complete skill set. Not stars, but maybe fewer big gaps in skill set.
Rebounding should improve. Defense? IDK - fingers crossed.
Shooting? Same as always - sometimes good, sometimes not so good.
Last year the Hawks were 24-5 when shooting +40% from the floor. 19-2 when shooting 44.4% or better.
They were 21-4 when shooting +30% from 3.
I'm ready to see this team in action.
Power rankings or the end of the season?#7. Should be ahead of Northwestern and Wisconsin.
#7. Should be ahead of Northwestern and Wisconsin.
jNW lost Audige but added a good transfer in from Princeton. I think they definitely punched above their weight class last season. Tough to tell.Power rankings or the end of the season?
I really don't know anything about the B1G teams for 23/24. They change so fast.
Yeah I think Northwestern is going to take a step back this year--I think losing Audige is going to really hurt them.jNW lost Audige but added a good transfer in from Princeton. I think they definitely punched above their weight class last season. Tough to tell.
Wisconsin added a sophomore guard from St. John's who looks like he can score. And they return a lot of guys from last season.
I'd say Iowa probably ahead of jNW but not Wisconsin.