Shocking. Trump does love the poorly educated, though.
Project 2025, it’s going to happen
- Thread starter BlIIlken2
- Start date
This is just more of "even though he said it, it won't happen". The senators will fall in line with almost zero fight. They'll claim they fought it so they can sleep at night, but they won't stand up for it. I think it's funny that you think they care about people outside their base. Why should they care.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,853
- 204,052
- 113
What I love is Trump defenders saying "well it didn't get repealed did it!?" as if that bolsters their case. It wasn't for lack of trying!
I honestly kind of feel like the Democrats should just abstain from every vote and let Trump and his administration pass every cockamamie idea they have and sit back and watch all hell break loose. Hell, trying to "constrain" and "guardrail" and "obsruct" him only empowered him more because he could use that as "proof" that he was being persectured and treated "very, very poorly."
Let them burn it all down and not win another election for four decades. You broke it, you buy it.
Trump has already gutted the Department of Education? Do states help with Eduction funding for this person?
I agree, let it play out. It's stupid for dems to try and play the good guy when many of the people they're trying to protect voted for trump. If the dems stop something, it just ends up with your first statement. The dems don't get credit for stopping it, trump gets credit for not being able to implement it. The dems need to follow the normal process when trying to help people, people either never can be helped or the people have to hit rock bottom and then ask for help.
Poor MikeyHawk. We know you only want to read far-right political posts. Sorry you have to read some that aren’t up to speed with The Blaze.
To bad your condemnation now will do less than nothing. The time and place to condemn it was on Tuesday in the voting both. Oopsie daisy!
As you look at Project 2025 what are you most worried about, what do you think might be implemented and how quickly? Interested in hearing your perspective.
Hey pussy @KFsdisciple. Are you too scared to answer his question?
Sorry I was driving home from work, you know that place adults have to go everyday to earn a paycheck because we can’t all be welfare recipients like yourself.
And no, I wasn’t one of the people who said it would never happen, but I’m glad it did, it returned the power back to the people to decide not 9 non elected judges… but your side likes non elected people that’s how you gave us Harris to beat.
Why don’t you sit down before you hurt yourself.
Where's that Stephen Miller Twitter post. I couldn't find it yesterday. May be a fake
Lol at “my side”. Also cool diss on the welfare! Too bad it should be used for someone like @IAFB2021Champs, who is surely on “your side.” Not sure who’s further right between you two, but at least 2021 watches sports unlike your bitch ass.
Yeah I assumed you would not have a clever comeback. Pray to your little god that she’ll give you a brain. Though it’s probably too late. Judging by your posts you’re a 73 year old who wishes it was 1862 again.
I am unfamiliar with this, but saw a local parent say that was covered under the IDEA Act, which was law before the DOE was even formed?
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act - Wikipedia
You’re the guy who gives wrong change at McDonalds obviously… nice math skills buddy
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,853
- 204,052
- 113
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,853
- 204,052
- 113
All last summer, GOP reps who voted against the Biden infrastructure bill gleefully showed up at groundbreakings, ribbon cuttings and other celebrations marking the influx of new projects they did not support.
They are completely shameless.
Rep. Miller-Meeks keeps taking credit for funding she voted against
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks has publicly touted the roughly $470 million in infrastructure funding that’s been promised to her district, even though she voted against the passage of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill, which is providing the funding.
iowastartingline.com
Last edited:
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,853
- 204,052
- 113
Just read about this one that I didn't even know was in the document. I would expect action on it fairly soon:
Project 2025 seeks to redefine abortion so that it is no longer recognized as healthcare, and would ban the CDC from advocating for it. Denying abortion as healthcare is dangerous and naive. In many cases, abortion is necessary, especially when it threatens a woman’s health or life. In states where abortions have been banned or heavily restricted, increasing numbers of women are sharing stories of being denied the care they needed, resulting in serious health risks. Tragically, in some cases, the lack of timely care has even resulted in preventable deaths.
The authors of Project 2025 propose a dangerous overreach by the government through the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) by aiming to collect invasive data on women who have abortions, or have suffered a miscarriage. Their plan will coerce states into reporting detailed information on women seeking abortions – including gestational age, reasons for the procedure, and the patient’s residency – by threatening to cut federal funding.
They aim to rescind the Biden administration’s guidance under EMTALA, a crucial emergency medical law that ensures hospitals provide abortion care in life-threatening situations. Additionally, they propose dismantling the Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force and replacing it with an anti-abortion task force, further restricting access to critical reproductive healthcare. This invasive approach risks criminalizing both patients and providers, threatening the health, privacy, and rights of women nationwide.
Project 2025: Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights - Doctors of the World
Doctors of the World is a human rights organization providing emergency and long-term medical care. Read our Project 2025: Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights page for more info.
doctorsoftheworld.org
So you’re sourcing something other than the actual document? Why is that? If you find that in project 2025, and if it happens to come to fruition, I will admit Ive been wrong about everything.Just read about this one that I didn't even know was in the document. I would expect action on it fairly soon:
Project 2025 seeks to redefine abortion so that it is no longer recognized as healthcare, and would ban the CDC from advocating for it. Denying abortion as healthcare is dangerous and naive. In many cases, abortion is necessary, especially when it threatens a woman’s health or life. In states where abortions have been banned or heavily restricted, increasing numbers of women are sharing stories of being denied the care they needed, resulting in serious health risks. Tragically, in some cases, the lack of timely care has even resulted in preventable deaths.
The authors of Project 2025 propose a dangerous overreach by the government through the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) by aiming to collect invasive data on women who have abortions, or have suffered a miscarriage. Their plan will coerce states into reporting detailed information on women seeking abortions – including gestational age, reasons for the procedure, and the patient’s residency – by threatening to cut federal funding.
They aim to rescind the Biden administration’s guidance under EMTALA, a crucial emergency medical law that ensures hospitals provide abortion care in life-threatening situations. Additionally, they propose dismantling the Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force and replacing it with an anti-abortion task force, further restricting access to critical reproductive healthcare. This invasive approach risks criminalizing both patients and providers, threatening the health, privacy, and rights of women nationwide.
Project 2025: Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights - Doctors of the World
Doctors of the World is a human rights organization providing emergency and long-term medical care. Read our Project 2025: Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights page for more info.
The IDEA Act didn’t predate the DOE. It was built on DOE administration and funding.I am unfamiliar with this, but saw a local parent say that was covered under the IDEA Act, which was law before the DOE was even formed?
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The requirements are only applicable to states that receive DOE funding. You’d have to completely rewrite the law to get it to work in the absence of the DOE. You’d also need to set up an administrative body, funding, and distribution.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,853
- 204,052
- 113
Page 62:
Abolishing the Gender Policy Council would eliminate central promotion of abortion (“health services”); comprehensive sexuality education (“education”); and the new woke gender ideology, which has as a principal tenet “gender affirming care” and “sex-change” surgeries on minors. the Gender Policy Council would eliminate central promotion of abortion (“health services”); comprehensive sexuality education (“education”); and the new woke gender ideology, which has as a principal tenet “gender affirming care” and “sex-change” surgeries on minors. In addition to elim- inating the council, developing new structures and positions will have the dual effect of demonstrating that promoting life and strengthening the family is a pri- ority while also facilitating more seamless coordination and consistency across the U.S. government. Specifically, the President should appoint a position/point of contact with the rank of Special Assistant to the President or higher to coordinate and lead the Pres- ident’s domestic priorities on issues related to life and family in cooperation with the Domestic Policy Council. This position would be responsible for facilitating meetings, discussions, and agreements among personnel; coordinating Adminis- tration policy; and ensuring agency support for implementation of policies related to the promotion of life and familyin the United States.
Feel free to use Control F to find even more - I stopped after about 50 because I was getting sick to my stomach:
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
What’s your problem? Someone else on here owning you as well? Good to see you like me more though because I enjoy sports. Even if you say I don’t know anything about them. Have a great night. Same place tomorrow?
Global warming...next ice age...florida falls off end of the earth....aliens arrive...we run out of oil... it's gonna happen
Just read about this one that I didn't even know was in the document. I would expect action on it fairly soon:
Project 2025 seeks to redefine abortion so that it is no longer recognized as healthcare, and would ban the CDC from advocating for it. Denying abortion as healthcare is dangerous and naive. In many cases, abortion is necessary, especially when it threatens a woman’s health or life. In states where abortions have been banned or heavily restricted, increasing numbers of women are sharing stories of being denied the care they needed, resulting in serious health risks. Tragically, in some cases, the lack of timely care has even resulted in preventable deaths.
The authors of Project 2025 propose a dangerous overreach by the government through the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) by aiming to collect invasive data on women who have abortions, or have suffered a miscarriage. Their plan will coerce states into reporting detailed information on women seeking abortions – including gestational age, reasons for the procedure, and the patient’s residency – by threatening to cut federal funding.
They aim to rescind the Biden administration’s guidance under EMTALA, a crucial emergency medical law that ensures hospitals provide abortion care in life-threatening situations. Additionally, they propose dismantling the Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force and replacing it with an anti-abortion task force, further restricting access to critical reproductive healthcare. This invasive approach risks criminalizing both patients and providers, threatening the health, privacy, and rights of women nationwide.
Project 2025: Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights - Doctors of the World
Doctors of the World is a human rights organization providing emergency and long-term medical care. Read our Project 2025: Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights page for more info.
Thank you for sharing Torbee. Always appreciate your perspective.
I would hope that nothing close to this would ever be implemented, but the world can be a funny place.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 97,853
- 204,052
- 113
It was called something else before, in 1970 or whatever. Semantics I guess, meaning this act is independently protecting these children with disabilities, and would not go away if DOE was dismantled, but would be administered under some other branch? More or less efficiently, who the hell knows. All I was trying to ask was if the IDEA ACT is sort of like a seperat thing from DOE , in that IF DOE is scrapped, its not as though disabled children are suddenly not protected?
*Asking for my educational purposes only, not being argumentative. My own googling is a lot of anti Trump stuff, and I'm too lazy to sift around to find my answers.
Respect for Life and Conscience. The CDC should eliminate programs and
projects that do not respect human life and conscience rights and that undermine family formation. It should ensure that it is not promoting abortion as health care
Bottom of page 454-top of 455.
Because liberal states have now become sanctuaries for abortion tourism, HHS
should use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every
state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what
gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and
by what method.
Page 455
I will admit I never read Project 2025, just heard about how awful it is. Just after reading enough to find these excerpts. It's as bad or worse than I thought.
I believe the IDEA is a federal law administered by the DOE. The DOE basically oversees the implementation of the law.
IDEA replaced the EAHCA. There is no backup.
If the DOE disappeared tomorrow, so would the IDEA Act. Congress would need to pass a new bill with new funding, administration, and enforcement. There’s also a ton of common law in the interpretation of IDEA that would require re-litigation.
Similar threads
